Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 55 of about 598 results (0.020 seconds)Lotus Green Llp vs.renowned Buildtech Private Limited
Court: Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d November, 2017 Pronounced on:04. h December, 2017 CS(COMM) 400/2017 LOTUS GREEN LLP ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.T.K.Ganju, Sr. Adv. with and Mukhi Mr.Ashish Ms.Madhurima Kapoor, Advs. versus RENOWNED BUILDTECH PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Defendant Through : Mr.Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Puja Dewan Seth and Uday Seth, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.IA No.6829/2017 & 8114/2017 1. This application (IA No.8114/2017) under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC is moved by the defendant for vacation of an interim order dated 30.05.2017 passed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC (IA No.6829/2017) wherein the defendant was restrained from advertising, offering of service/sale, adopting, using and/or dealing in any manner with the plaintiffs registered trademarks/name Lotus and logo of the plaintiff or any other trade mark identical or deceptively similar to the CS(COMM) No.400/2017 1 of 21 plaintiffs above mentio...
Tag this Judgment!Ajab Singh vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-78 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:04. h December, 2017 + W.P.(C) 12177/2015 AJAB SINGH Through: Mr. Sunil K. Goel and Mr. Lalit K. ........ Petitioner versus Rawal, Advs. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC Mr. Ashutosh Ghade and Mr. Nikhil Goel, Advs. for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a declaration that land in Khasra No.47(15-5), 48(01-00) and 49(12-19) total area 29 bighas 4 biswa (1/12th share measuring 2 Bigha 9 Biswa) situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Ghonda Gujaran Khadar, Shahdara, Delhi stands lapsed in view of the provisions of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation And Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation And Resettlement Act, 20...
Tag this Judgment!Delhi Development Authority vs.deepak
Court: Delhi
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :4. h DECEMBER, 2017 + RSA2142013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant DEEPAK Through : Mr.Nikhil Goel, Advocate with Mr.Aniruddha Deshmukh, Advocate. Mr.Amit Singh, Advocate for GNCTD. versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Mr.Virender Ganda, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Vipul Ganda, Mr.Tarun Mehta & Ms.Shelly Khanna, Advocates for applicant in CM1425516. S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) CM142552016 [u/O I R102) CPC].1. The application for impleadment in the present appeal has been preferred by Kanwar Singh and Kuldeep Singh. It is contested by the respondent / non-applicant.2. Learned Senior Counsel for the applicants urged that applicants presence is necessary in the present proceedings to assist the Court to arrive at a just and proper conclusion. The proposed respondent No.2 is owner of a portion of land of khasra No.4/29 situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Sahipur; it is adjacent to the RSA2142013 Page...
Tag this Judgment!Sunil Kumar Chhilar vs.navyug School Education Society and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:04. December, 2017 + W.P.(C) 12175/2016 SUNIL KUMAR CHHILAR ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocate Versus NAVYUG SCHOOL EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Taranvir Singh Khechar & Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Advocates with Mr. Vikas Mathur, AO & Mr. K.L. Mighlani, AAO, for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) ORDER1 Vide impugned order of 18th July, 2016 (Annexure P-9), petitioners objection to the seniority list of primary teachers has been cryptically dismissed by merely observing that the objection of not granting marks for experience at the time of interview is time barred.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner was never made aware of the merit list of candidates in respect of interview held on 25th & 26th March, 2009 (Annexure P-11) and for the first time petitioner learnt about it in the year 2016. W.P.(C) 12175/2016 Page 1 of 3 3. This ...
Tag this Judgment!Vinod @ Daddu vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 19, 2017 Judgment Delivered on: December 04, 2017 CRL.A. 1253/2015 ANIL ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr.Ankit Mathur, proxy counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dua, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar PS Vijay Vihar ..... Respondent AND + AND + CRL.A. 1278/2015 ASHISH @ KALI @ AMAR ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr.Upendra Yogesh, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar PS Vijay Vihar ..... Respondent CRL.A. 222/2016 PARVEEN @ MONTY ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate with Mr.Aman Choudhry, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar PS Vijay Vihar ..... Respondent STATE AND CRL.A. Nos.1253 & 1278 of 2015 and 222 & 542 of 2016 Page 1 of 26 + CRL.A. 542/2016 & CRL.M.A.9188/2016 VINOD @ DADDU ..... Appellant Through: Mr.S.K.Gandhi, Advocate with appellant in pers...
Tag this Judgment!Seema Tiwari & Ors vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:04. 12.2017 + W.P.(C) 6335/2016 and CM Nos. 25978/2016, 26641/2016 & 40668/2017 SEEMA TIWARI & ORS ........ Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in these cases: For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS AND : Mr Naresh Thanai, Ms Khushboo Singh, Ms Bharti. : Mr Devesh Singh, ASC, GNCTD with Ms Neelam Kholiya R-1 & 2. + W.P.(C) 12247/2016 and CM Nos. 48311/2016 & 41234/2017 SEEMA TIWARI & ORS ........ Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in these cases: For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU : Mr Naresh Thanai, Ms Khushboo Singh, Ms Bharti. : Mr Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr R.A. Iyer, for R-1. Mr Prem Mishra, LA, DTIDC. VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioners have filed the present petitions, inter alia, impugning the communications dated 18.07.2016 and 19.07....
Tag this Judgment!Akhil Gera vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on:17. h November, 2017 Order pronounced on:4. h December, 2017 + BAIL APPLN. 428/2017 ANIL GERA .Petitioner Through: Mr. Prashant Sharma, Mr. Kartik Khanna Versus Advocates. STATE ..Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with W/ASI Parvati, P.S. Subhash Place Mr. B.S. Rana, Mr. Satyam Sisodia and Mr. Manish Awasthi Advocates for Complainant. + BAIL APPLN. 429/2017 AKHIL GERA .Petitioner Through: Mr. Prashant Sharma, Mr. Kartik Khanna Versus Advocates. STATE ..Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with W/ASI Parvati, P.S. Subhash Place Mr. B.S. Rana, Mr. Satyam Sisodia and Mr. Manish Awasthi Advocates for Complainant.1. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL By way of the present petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred 'Cr.P.C.'), the petitioner seeks grant of Anticipatory Bail in FIR No.35/2017 under BAIL APPLN. 428/2017& 429/2017 Pa...
Tag this Judgment!Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.saddam & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-626 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:04. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11142012 and CM179392012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate versus SADDAM & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Kavita Tyagi for Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The counsel for the appellant submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the appeal.2. The appeal and the pending application are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.3. In terms of order dated 16.10.2012, the insurance company had been directed to deposit the entire awarded amount with up-to-date interest and from out of such deposit, eighty percent (80%) was permitted to be released to the claimants. The balance with accrued interest shall also now be released to the claimants in terms of the judgment of the tribunal. MAC Appeal No.1114/2012 Page 1 of 2 4. The statutory amount shall be refunded to the insurance company ...
Tag this Judgment!Abbott Healthcare Pvt Ltd vs.raj Kumar Prasad & Ors
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h December, 2017 CS(OS) 3534/2012 ABBOTT HEALTHCARE PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Ranjan Narula and Ms. Astha Joshi, Advocates versus RAJ KUMAR PRASAD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. Mohan Vidhani and Mr. Ashish Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.14337/2017 (under Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act by the plaintiff) in CS (OS) No.3534/2012.1. The counsel for the defendants appears on advance notice and seeks time to file reply.2. It has been enquired from the counsel for the defendants as to what is there to be pleaded factually for a reply to be required.3. The counsel for the defendants agrees that his opposition to the application is on legal grounds only; however, he still seeks adjournment stating that he is not prepared for the arguments.4. There is no reason for the counsel to appear unprepared before the Court.5. The counsel for the defendants states that even if he had n...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Hanuman Mandir Committee, (Regd.) and Anr. Vs.the Govt. Of Nct of ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:04. December, 2017 + W.P.(C) 10750/2017 & C.Ms. 44018-19/2017 SHRI HANUMAN MANDIR COMMITTEE, (REGD.) AND ANR. Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Garg & Mr. Imran Khan, Advocates ........ Petitioners Versus THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, CGSC & Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocate for respondent- GNCTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) ORDER1 Against order of 29th April, 2017 (Annexure P-4), petitioner claims to have filed a Representation on 19th May, 2017 (Annexure P-5) with second respondent and it is asserted by petitioners counsel that the said Representation has not been responded to.2. Learned counsel appearing for respondent- Directorate of Education submits that if it is so, then Representation of 19th May, 2017 (Annexure P-5) shall be decided within four weeks and its fate would be made known to petitioner within two weeks thereafter. W.P.(C) 10750/2017 Page 1 of 2 3. Let res...
Tag this Judgment!