Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 50 of about 598 results (0.009 seconds)Pranay Nijhawan vs.ggsipu and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:05. 12.2017 LPA7742017, C.M. APPL.44198/2017 & 44199/2017 PRANAY NIJHAWAN . Appellant Through: Ms. Shakti Vardhan with Ms. Aastha Shah, Advocates. versus GGSIPU AND ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Anita Sahani, Advocate, for Respondent No.1. Mr. T. Singhdev with Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Mr. Tarun Verma, Ms. Michelle Biakthansangi, Ms. Puja Sarkar and Mr. Abhijit, Advocates, for Respondent No.5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The appellants complain that the learned Single Judge, who dismissed their writ petition, fell into error in concluding that pooling of all seats left- over State seats as well as others, without any institutional preference and their filling-up on merit basis, was impermissible. They contend that all such seats can be pooled for the purpose of counselling to fill post- graduate medical seats, in Delhi.2. The appellant filed W....
Tag this Judgment!Maharaja Jagat Singh vs.lt. Col. Sawai Bhawani Singh
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 11.2017 Pronounced on:05. 12.2017 I.A. NO.11365/2010 IN CS (OS) 870/1986 MAHARAJA JAGAT SINGH . Plaintiff Through: Sh. Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Meera Mathur and Ms. Divya Harchandani, Advocates, for LRs of Plaintiff No.1 Sh. D.D. Singh, Advocate, for Plaintiff No.3. Versus LT. COL. SAWAI BHAWANI SINGH .... Respondent Through: Sh. Manish Kumar with Sh. Yudhister Singh, Advocates, for LRs of Defendant No.1. Sh. Shyam Moorjani, Advocate, for Defendant Nos. 2 and 4. Sh. Rahul Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for Administrator- cum-Receiver. Sh. S.S. Sham Singh with Sh. Vikas Malik, Advocates, for State of Rajasthan. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present judgment will dispose of a petition, which seeks review and recall of the order dated 19.10.2010 made by this Court, disposing of applications (I.A. Nos.13190/2009 and 13191/2009) to substitute the legal CS (OS) 870/1986 Page...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India and Ors vs.bhagwat Lal
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11069/2016 & C.M No.43217/2016(for stay) UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Ashok Singh, Advocate for UoI. versus BHAGWAT LAL ..... Respondent Through Mr. T.D. Yadav, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER0512.2017 1. The present petition assails an order dated 04.10.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No.788/2015, allowing the O.A. filed by the respondent and directing the petitioners herein to correct the respondents date of birth in his service book, as being 01.07.1959. The respondent had preferred the aforesaid O.A being aggrieved by the entry of his date of birth by the petitioners/Northern Railways as 01.12.1956 in his service book and by their subsequent refusal to correct his date of birth in the same, despite repeated representations. WP (C) No.11069/2016 Page 1 of 7 2. The brief facts as emerge from the...
Tag this Judgment!Rajesh Kumar & Anr. Vs.state, n.c.t. Of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~R-15 to R-17 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 05, 2017 CRL.A. 519/2011 NEERAJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Appellant in person. versus STATE, N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent AND + Through: Ms.Rajni Gupta, APP for the State with SI H.P.Mudgal PS P.Vihar CRL.A. 520/2011 NEERAJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Appellant in person. versus STATE, N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI H.P.Mudgal PS P.Vihar AND + CRL.A. 1005/2011 RAJESH KUMAR & ANR. Through: None. versus ..... Appellants CRL.A. Nos.519, 520 & 1005 of 2011 Page 1 of 8 STATE, N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI H.P.Mudgal PS P.Vihar PRATIBHA RANI, J.(Oral) Crl.A.519/2011 & Crl.M.A.No.4944/2011 & Crl.M.B.No.685/2011 Crl.A.520/2011 & Crl.M.A.No.4945/2011 & Crl.M.B.No.686/2011 1. The appellant/convict Neeraj Kumar has filed these two appeals assailing his conviction and sentence award...
Tag this Judgment!Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.arun Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-643 & 644 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:05. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11562012 and CM186722012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate Through: versus SHYAM SUNDER KUMAR RAI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R-1 + MAC APPEAL11602012 and CM187112012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate versus ARUN KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first respondents in both these appeals were the claimants before the tribunal in claim cases (MACT1030and 1032/10/09) instituted on 20.04.2009. By similar judgments passed on 28.08.2012 in each case, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) held that they had suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that took place MAC Appeal No.1156/2012 & 1160/2012 Page 1 of 3 on 26.01.2009 at about 02.15 hours d...
Tag this Judgment!United India Insurance Company Limited vs.amit Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-639 & 639A (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Decided on:5. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11442012 and CM No.18466/2012 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya, Advocate versus AMIT KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. O. P. Mannie, Advocate for R-1 + MAC APPEAL5712013 AMIT KUMAR & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O. P. Mannie, Advocate versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) By judgment dated 30.05.2012, the motor accident claim 1. tribunal decided the accident claim case (MACT74410/7) which had been instituted on 31.08.2007 seeking compensation under sections MACA Nos.1144/2012 & 571/2013 Page 1 of 5 166 and 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for injuries statedly suffered by Amit Kumar, the claimant (respondent no.1 in MAC APP.1144/2002 and appellant in MAC APP.571/2013). By the said...
Tag this Judgment!Ashish @ Kali @ Amar vs.state
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 19, 2017 Judgment Delivered on: December 04, 2017 CRL.A. 1253/2015 ANIL ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr.Ankit Mathur, proxy counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dua, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar PS Vijay Vihar ..... Respondent AND + AND + CRL.A. 1278/2015 ASHISH @ KALI @ AMAR ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr.Upendra Yogesh, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar PS Vijay Vihar ..... Respondent CRL.A. 222/2016 PARVEEN @ MONTY ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate with Mr.Aman Choudhry, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar PS Vijay Vihar ..... Respondent STATE AND CRL.A. Nos.1253 & 1278 of 2015 and 222 & 542 of 2016 Page 1 of 26 + CRL.A. 542/2016 & CRL.M.A.9188/2016 VINOD @ DADDU ..... Appellant Through: Mr.S.K.Gandhi, Advocate with appellant in pers...
Tag this Judgment!Kamla Devi Sohan Raj Singhvi Jain College of Education vs.national Cou ...
Court: Delhi
$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + LPA7712017 Judgment delivered on:04. 12.2017 KAMLA DEVI SOHAN RAJ SINGHVI JAIN COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ..... Appellant Through : Mr Mayank Manish and Mr Ravi Kant, Advocates. versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms Arunima Dwivedi, Ms Preeti Kumra and Ms Nirbhay Kumar Pathak, Advocates for R-1 & 2. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) CM No.44048 /2017(exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM No.44049/2017(delay in filing appeal for 34 days) For the reasons stated in the application and in the interest of justice, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is disposed of. LPA7712017 Page 1 of 7 LPA7712017 1. Issue notice. Ms Arunima Dwivedi, Advocate accepts notice for the respondents.2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the Appeal is heard today.3. The Appellant i...
Tag this Judgment!Balraj Parashar vs.union Academy Sr. Sec. School and Ors
Court: Delhi
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 04, 2017 W.P.(C) 2272/2012 BALRAJ PARASHAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja and Mr. Anuj Chauhan, Advocates versus UNION ACADEMY SR. SEC. SCHOOL AND ORS ....Respondents Through: Ms. Urmila Kar Purkayastha, Advocate for Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. Shadan Farasat and Mr. Ahmed Said, Advocates for respondents No.3 & 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) In the first round of litigation, respondent-Directorate of Education was directed to decide petitioners Representation of 10th November, 2008, which has been now decided vide impugned order of 11th February, 2011 (Annexure P-13).2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the Selection Committee of respondent-School had recommended petitioner for appointment on the post of Librarian, subject to grant of age relaxation in terms of D.O. letter of 29th October, 1975. Respondent-Directorate of Educa...
Tag this Judgment!Manjeet Singh & Ors. Vs.narjeet Singh
Court: Delhi
$~4 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 283/2017 & CM Nos.39155-56/2017 % Date of decision :4. h December, 2017 MANJEET SINGH & ORS. ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Medhanshu Tripathi and Mr. A.K. Singh, Advs. versus NARJEET SINGH ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM No.39156/2017 (Condonation of delay of 51 days in filing the appeal) 1. Heard ld. counsels for the parties.2. It is stated in the application that the ld. counsel for the appellant had gone to his native place to see his ailing father for which reason the appeal could not be filed within the statutory period of limitation.3. The explanation tendered appears to be reasonable and is hereby accepted.4. 5. The delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is allowed. FAO(OS)No.283/2017 Page 1 of 7 FAO(OS) 283/2017 6. The appellant assails the order dated 8th Au...
Tag this Judgment!