Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Xs Productions India vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8924/2017 & CM Nos.36531-36532/2017 M/S XS PRODUCTIONS INDIA ........ Petitioner Date of Decision:04. 12.2017 Through: Mr. K.K. Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajiv Bakshi, Mr. Gagandeep Chauhan & Mr. Aviral Agnihotri, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain with Ms. Komal Pandey, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Manoj Singh & Ms. Namrata Chadha, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The writ petitioners grievance is that the eligibility criteria spelt out in the tender issued by the first respondent Ministry of Tourism, for setting up an India Pavilion in two International Trade Fairs, does not permit entertaining bids by consortiums, Joint Ventures or other association of persons and rather clarifies that only a professional agency who has an annual turnover of `8 crores can bid in the process. W.P.(C) No.8924/20...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.savita Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2017
$~R-625 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:04. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11122012 and CM179352012 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus SAVITA DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. At the hearing on this appeal directed against judgment dated 03.08.2012 on accident claim case (suit no.10/2012), the insurance company raises only the issue of recovery rights on the ground that it was not granted effective opportunity to lead evidence to show that the document on the basis of which the driving licence had been obtained, it being valid for the period 18.06.2008 to 25.07.2014 as confirmed by the investigating police officer, was not genuine. Even if such opportunity had been granted, it would have made no difference in view of the ruling of this court in Future Generali India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Bala & Ors., MACA5132014 decided on 17.03.2016, which ha...
Abdul Wahab (Dead) Thr Lrs. & Ors. Vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2017
$~R-31 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:04. h December, 2017 + W.P.(C) 3117/2015 ABDUL WAHAB (DEAD) THR LRS. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Mr. Chirag Sharma and Mr. N. U. Ahmed, Advs. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Siddharth Panda, Adv. for R-1 to 3 (L&B/LAC) Ms. Akshita, Adv. for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land measuring 23 bigha 7 biswa, wrongly typed as 20 bigha 67 biswa in the writ petition, situated in the revenue estate of village Hauz Rani, Tehsil Mehrauli, Delhi stands lapsed.2. It is the case of the petitioner that a notification under Sections 4, 6 and 17 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued on 16.10.1980. It is also the case of the petitioner that...
Rahul Mehra vs.ag International Logistics India (P.) Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2017
$~CP-12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CO.A(SB) 14/2016 RAHUL MEHRA Date of decision:04. 12.2017 ..... Appellant Through Ms.Vibha Mahajan Seth, Adv. versus AG INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS INDIA (P.) LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-2/ROC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This appeal is filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking to impugn the order dated 04.12.2015 passed by the Company Law Board (in short the CLB)in CP No.01/614/2014 under Section 614 of the Act.2. Some of the relevant facts as stated in the appeal are that the appellant was appointed as a director of respondent No.1 company on 30.01.2006 and was allotted 1% equity shareholding for which he paid a sum of Rs.1,50,000/-. The appellant was also paid a fixed monthly salary by respondent No.1 company for his services as the whole-time director of respondent No.1 company. As disputes had aris...
Kamlesh Devi vs.shyam Sunder Tyagi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h December, 2017 CS(OS) 644/2017 KAMLESH DEVI ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Atha Sagar Verma, Advocate versus SHYAM SUNDER TYAGI & ORS Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.14219/2017 (for exemption) ..... Defendants 1.2. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CS(OS) No.644/2017 & IA No.14218/2017 (under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC).3. This is yet another misconceived suit of the category dealt with by this Court in Neelam Vs. Sada Ram 2013 SCC OnLine Del 384, Naval Kishore Vs. Shri Jugal Kishore MANU/DE/0978/2013, Bala Devi Vs. Chhotu Ram 2013 SCC OnLine Del 1159, Rajat Khanna Vs. R.P. Khanna (2013) 200 DLT203 Harvinder Singh Chadha Vs. Saran Kaur Chadha 2014 SCC OnLine Del 3413, Jai Narain Mathur Vs. Jai Prakash Mathur (2016) 228 DLT515 Satyawati Vs. Suraj Bhan 2017 SCC OnLine Del 7961, Sunny (Minor) Vs. Raj Singh (2015) 225 DLT211 Surender Kumar Vs. Dhani R...
Bhoop Singh vs.state and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on:21. t November, 2017 Order pronounced on:4. h December, 2017 + CRL. REV.P.632/2016 BHOOP SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jatin Gupta, Advocate. STATE & ANR versus .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for the State with SI Sunder Singh from PS-Baba Haridas Nagar for R-1. Ms. Rakhi Dubey Adv. For R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 The present Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) assailing the judgement dated 27.05.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dwarka Courts, Delhi in Criminal Appeal No.12/16, whereby the judgement dated 02.01.2015 and order on sentence dated 17.01.2015 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate was upheld.2. Factual matrix emerging from the record is that, a complaint was lodged by one Amit Kumar alleging therein that the petitioner who being in close family re...
Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs.lata & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2017
$~R-635 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:4. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.1133/2012 & CM APPL.18243/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate versus ... Appellant LATA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Ram Avtar, aged 47 years, earning his livelihood as a fruit vendor, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 21.01.2009, due to negligent driving of motor vehicle described as bus bearing registration No.DL-1PB-4792 and died in the consequence, the said vehicle admittedly having been insured against third party risk with the appellant (insurer) for the period in question. On accident claim case (MACT No.812/10), instituted by his wife and three other family members dependent upon him, they being first to fourth respondents (collectively, the claimants), the tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 29.08.2012, awarded compensation in the t...
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs.promila Prabhakar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2017
$~R-627 & 628 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:04. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11172012 and CM179512012 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus PROMILA PRABHAKAR & ORS. Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC APPEAL1842013 PROMILA PRABHAKAR ..... Appellant Through: None versus GULBIR SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R- 3/insurance company CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vikas Prabhakar, a bachelor, stated to be 26 years old, died due to the injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 11.10.1997, statedly due to negligent driving of a bus bearing registration no.DL-1P-3703 by the fourth respondent (driver). His parents, first and second respondents, instituted accident claim MACA Nos.1117/2012 & 184/2013 Page 1 of 4 case (MACT1399/11) on 29.07.1999 impleading the siblings of the deceased, they being fifth and sixth responden...
Paramjit Singh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 6550/2017 Date of decision:4. h December, 2017 PARAMJIT SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Adv. and Mr. Chirag Sharma, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC Ms. Mrinalini Sen Gupta and Ms. Sarita Panda, Advs. for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The counter-affidavit has been handed over in Court, copy has been supplied. The same is taken on record. With the consent of the parties the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner. The petitioner is the owner of the land admeasuring 1824 Sq. Yds. out of Khasra Nos. 732 & 733, Village Tuglakabad, Delhi corresponding to property bearing No.101, M.B. Road, New Delhi. W.P.(C) No.6550/2017 Page ...
Harjeet Singh vs.satish R Nathani & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~OS-2 * % + CS(COMM) 1055/2016 HARJEET SINGH Date of Decision :04. 12.2017 ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Mohan Vidhani, Mr.Shish Singh & Mr.Madan Mohan, Advs. versus SATISH R NATHANI & ORS Through ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree of permanent injunction to restrain the defendants, etc. from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale or dealing in shirts and readymade garments, etc. under the trade mark/label POLICE GUYS or any other mark identical or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs second trade mark GUY'S DANG. Other connected reliefs are also sought regarding the two trademarks/label POLICE GUYS and GUY'S DANG.2. On 15.09.2014, this court noted that the defendants are served. It also noted that learned counsel appearing for defendant No.3 was ready to give an undertaking not to use the trade mark in question in future provided the plaintiff wo...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »