Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 48 of about 598 results (0.020 seconds)Akshay Mehta & Ors. Vs.smt. Usha Dutta & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:05. h December 2017 CS(OS) 2/2007 AKSHAY MEHTA & ORS. versus SMT USHA DUTTA & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Plaintiffs : Mr Arun Francis ..... Plaintiffs ..... Defendants For the Defendants : Mr Rajesh Yadav and Mr Sanjay Kumar Chhetry for D-2 to 4. Ms Maninder Acharya, Senior Advocate with Mr Yashraj Singh Deora, Mr Ragya Vaidehy Singh, Ms Sanjana Saddy, Mr Shakeel Sarwarwani, Mr Serman Rawat and Mr Sahil Sood for D-10. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J IA No.7923/2014(on b/o. D-2 to 4 u/O.VI R.17 CPC) 1. By this application, under Order VI Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), Defendant Nos.2 to 4 seek amendment of the Written Statement dated 22.10.2007.2. It is contended in the application that the Written Statement dated 22.10.2007 is no Written Statement in the eyes of law. This ========================================================== CS(OS) 02/20...
Tag this Judgment!Sushil Kumar Jain vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
$~1-4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on 1st December,2017 Order pronounced on 5th December,2017 + + + + versus CRL.M.C. 849/2017 BIRENDER SINGH YADAV C B I CRL.M.C. 930/2017 RAVINDER SINGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIO CRL.M.C. 934/2017 SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION versus versus CRL.M.C. 935/2017 MUKESH KUMAR CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Present: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate, Mr. Manish Tiwari, Mr.Anil Kumar, Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocates for the petitioner with petitioner in person in Crl.M.C. No.849/2017. Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.K. Mittal & Ms. Rachna Maheshwari, Advocates for the petitioner in Crl.M.C. Nos.930/2017, 934/2017 & 935/2017. Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Advocate for the CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL CRL.M.C. 849/2017 & conne...
Tag this Judgment!Prem Singh & Anr vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~24 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h December, 2017 + W.P.(C) 3304/2016 PREM SINGH & ANR Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, Mr. Tanveer Zaki, ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Mr. Navjot Kumar and Ms. Kulsum Haider, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Poonam Kalia, SCGC for R1. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC. Mr. Nikhil Goel and Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Advs. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. By the present petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners seek a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioners being 404 Sq. Yds., 101 Sq. Yds. and 200 Sq. Yds. comprised in Khasra No.554/214 measuring 2 bighas and 12 biswas situated in the revenue estate of Village-Jasola, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as subject land) are deemed to have lapsed in view of Sectio...
Tag this Judgment!Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.baljinder Kaur @ Balji ...
Court: Delhi
BALJINDER KAUR @ BALJIT KAUR & ORS. Through: None + MAC APPEAL1972016 BALJINDER KAUR @ BALJIT KAUR & ORS. Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellants $~R-641 & 642 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:05. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11472012 and CM185352012 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Bagga and Ms. Anjali Chawla, Advocates versus Versus BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Suman Bagga and Ms. Anjali Chawla, Advocates for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Surjit Singh was travelling in a Maruti Van bearing registration no.DL-3CZ-1437 (van), driven by Sumit Kumar (driver), a respondent MAC Appeal No.1147/2012 & 197/2016 Page 1 of 5 in these appeals on 08.07.2003, the van carrying several other persons. It came to be involved in a collision at about 02.00 hours with a truck bearing registration no.UP-30A-0768 (truck). As a result, Surjit S...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Co. Ltd vs.k K Kamal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
K K KAMAL & ORS. Through: + MAC APPEAL4132011 K K KAMAL & ORS. Through: versus ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant $~R-55A & 336 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + MAC APPEAL5822008 Decided on:5. h December, 2017 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur & Mr. Amit Gaur, Adv versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur & Mr. Amit Gaur, Adv CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The claimant had suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident 1. that took place on 19.01.2006 involving negligent driving by the driver of offending vehicle i.e. Bus bearing registration No.DL1PA MAC Appeal Nos. 582/2008 & 413/2011 Page 1 of 6 5917. Accident claim case 2was instituted on 25.05.2006. The tribunal held an enquiry and, by judgment dated 02.08.2008, accepted the case for compensation under section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 holding Shanker (respondent) responsible for negligent driving and causing the sai...
Tag this Judgment!Bhai Sarabjit Sabharwal @ Dr Sabi Sabharwal vs.bhai Balbir Singh & Ors ...
Court: Delhi
$~4. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EFA(OS) No.31/2016 Date of decision:5. h December, 2017 BHAI SARABJIT SABHARWAL @ DR SABI SABHARWAL ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ashish Mohan, Mr. Vikrant Singh Bloria & Mr. Akshit Mago, Advocates. versus BHAI BALBIR SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Akshay Ringe, Mr. Adit S. Pujari, Ms. Surabhi Dhar & Ms. Tusharika Mattoo, Advocates for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Anil Grover, Standing Counsel, Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, ASC, Mr. Mishal Vij & Ms. Noopur Singhal, Advocates for NDMC. Mr. Jasmeet Singh & Ms. Astha Sharma, Advocates for respondent No.6A. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Bhai Sarabjit Singh has filed the present intra-Court appeal impugning the orders dated 24th November, 2016 and 1st December, 2016 passed by the single Judge of this High Court in Execution Petition No.92/2016.2. Bhai Balbir Singh and 11 others have been impleaded as responde...
Tag this Judgment!Birender Singh Yadav vs.c B I
Court: Delhi
$~1-4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on 1st December,2017 Order pronounced on 5th December,2017 + + + + versus CRL.M.C. 849/2017 BIRENDER SINGH YADAV C B I CRL.M.C. 930/2017 RAVINDER SINGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIO CRL.M.C. 934/2017 SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION versus versus CRL.M.C. 935/2017 MUKESH KUMAR CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Present: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate, Mr. Manish Tiwari, Mr.Anil Kumar, Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocates for the petitioner with petitioner in person in Crl.M.C. No.849/2017. Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.K. Mittal & Ms. Rachna Maheshwari, Advocates for the petitioner in Crl.M.C. Nos.930/2017, 934/2017 & 935/2017. Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Advocate for the CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL CRL.M.C. 849/2017 & conne...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Khushi Ram Behari Lal vs.p.v. Kanakaraj Trading as Kalpatharu Tra ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1307/2016 M/S. KHUSHI RAM BEHARI LAL ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman with Mr. Kapil Kumar Giri and Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocates versus P.V. KANAKARAJ TRADING AS KALPATHARU TRADING CO. Through None ..... Defendant Date of Decision :05. h December, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, passing off, delivery up etc. The prayer clause in the suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"through themselves as also (a) For a decree of permanent injunction restraining all the defendant by their individual proprietors, partners, directors, agents, representatives, distributors, assigns, heirs, successors, stockiest and all others acting for and on their behalf from using, selling, soliciting, exporting, displaying, advertising or by any other mode or manner dealing in or using the impugned trademark TAJ MAHAL WI...
Tag this Judgment!Neeraj vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~R-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + NEERAJ Date of Decision: December 05, 2017 CRL.A. 1646/2013 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate with appellant produced from custody. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Rajni Gupta, AP for the PRATIBHA RANI, J.(Oral) State.1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant assailing the judgment 18th September, 2013 and order on sentence dated 25th September, 2013 passed in Sessions Case No.1(pertaining to FIR No.114/2009 under SectionsIPC, PS Bawana) whereby he has been convicted for committing the offence punishable under SectionIPC and sentenced as under: (i) U/s 458 IPC (ii) U/s 376 IPC : : to undergo RI for seven years with fine of 10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo RI for one year. to undergo RI for ten years and to pay a fine of 15,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo RI for two years. CRL.A. No.1646/2013 Page 1 of 18 2. Process of law was set into mot...
Tag this Judgment!Varun Aggarwal vs.state of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
$~66 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2424/2017 VARUN AGGARWAL ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State, Mr. Kuldeep Mansukhani with Mr. Savita Dalal, Advocates for R-2. % CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL0512.2017 ORDER1 By way of the present petition filed under Section 482 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred Cr.P.C.) the petitioner seeks setting aside of order dated 19.12.2016 in Criminal Complaint No.4998501/2016, passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate (hereinafter referred as MM), Dwarka Courts, and also order dated 13.04.2017 passed by the Additional Session Judge (hereinafter referred ASJ) in Criminal Revision No.120/2017.2. The brief facts of the present case are that the complainant lodged a complaint against the petitioner, wherein it was alleged that the petitioner had taken loan from the complainant at the...
Tag this Judgment!