Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 53 of about 598 results (0.019 seconds)Sourav Kumar vs.the State
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2325/2017 Order reserved on:24. HNovember, 2017 Order pronounced on:4. h December, 2017 SOURAV KUMAR .Petitioner Through: Mr. Kishan Singh Chauhan and Mr.A.K. Mishra, Advocates. versus THE STATE ..Respondent Through: Mr. Anita Abraham, APP for State with ASI Rudresh, P.S- Jaitpur. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 By way of the present petition filed under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code,1973 (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.) the petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in respect of FIR No.400/2017, under Section 323/341/365/3of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as IPC), registered by P.S. Jaitpur, New-Delhi.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the complaint was lodged by one Tinkoo aged 17 years alleging that on 01.08.2017 at about 6.30 pm, when he was returning on his scooty bearing registration No.DL-3SDE-5240 from his Uncles shop, he was stopped by two boys near th...
Tag this Judgment!South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.parmanand (Deceased) Through Lrs ...
Court: Delhi
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:4. h December, 2017 CM(M) 374/2016 and CM145282016 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Ms. Varundhara Nayyar and Ms. Anushanti, Advocates Versus + PARMANAND (DECEASED) THROUGH LRs & ORS Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petition at hand challenges the order dated 17.02.2016 of the Commercial Civil Judge on the file of civil suit 1whereby the application of the petitioner under Order VIII Rule 1A read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was dismissed.2. Inspite of the matter being passed over twice since morning, there is no appearance from the side of the respondents. It is 2.30 p.m. No good ground to keep the matter in wait further.3. The civil suit in which the impugned order was passed was filed by the first and second respondents (collectively, the claimants), inter alia, against the petitioner implea...
Tag this Judgment!Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.rukmani Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-629 & 630 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:04. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11202012 and CM179702012 and 17972/2012 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate versus RUKMANI DEVI & ORS. Through: Ms. Kavita Tyagi ........ RESPONDENTS for Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1 to 7 + MAC APPEAL4042013 RUKMANI DEVI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Kavita Tyagi for Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSRUANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Deep Chand, born on 15.01.1963, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 31.07.2008 due to negligent MACA Nos.1120/2012 & 404/2013 Page 1 of 5 driving of truck bearing registration no.HR-38M-5746 admittedly insured against third party risk with ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. (insurer) for the period in q...
Tag this Judgment!United India Insurance Company Limited vs.pooja & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-636 & R-637 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:4. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.1138/2012 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. De, Advocate with Mr. Zadhid Ali, Advocate versus POOJA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate with Ms. Kavita Tyagi, Advocate for R-1 to R-4. + MAC APPEAL No.1139/2012 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. De, Advocate with Mr. Zadhid Ali, Advocate Versus MANJEET & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate with Ms. Kavita Tyagi, Advocate for R-1 to R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Dinesh Maan and Sudesh Kumar, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 03.05.2009, due to negligent driving of motor vehicle described as car bearing registration No.DL- MACA11382012 & 1139/2012 Page 1 of 6 4CAF-3479 and died in the consequence. Two accident claim cases (MACT No7...
Tag this Judgment!Naresh Kumar Jain vs.lallan Shah
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.1002/2017 Reserved on:29. h November, 2017 Pronounced on:4. h December, 2017 % NARESH KUMAR JAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil K. Jain, Advocate with Mr. Anil K. Aggarwal, Advocate. LALLAN SHAH versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J C.M. Nos. 43487/2017 (exemption) & 43489/2017 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M.s stand disposed of. C.M. No.43491/2017 (for condonation of delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 262 days in filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.1002/2017 and C.M. Nos.43488/2017 (stay) & 43490/2017 (under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC) 3. This Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment of the Trial RFA No.1002/2017 Page 1 of 6 Court dated 5.12.2016 by which the trial court has dismissed the leave to defen...
Tag this Judgment!Gajinder vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-79 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:04. h December, 2017 + W.P.(C) 12180/2015 GAJINDER Through: Mr. Sunil K. Goel and Mr. Lalit K. ........ Petitioner versus Rawal, Advs. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC Ms. Akshita, Adv. for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a declaration that land in Khasra No.47(15-5), 48(01-00) and 49(12-19) total area 29 bighas 4 biswa (1/12th share measuring 2 bigha 9 biswa) situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Ghonda Gujaran Khadar, Shahdara, Delhi stands lapsed in view of the provisions of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation And Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation And Resettlement Act, 2013.2. The necessary facts to b...
Tag this Judgment!The Director Aiims vs.m/s Amtrak Technology Pvt. Ltd. & Anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % THE DIRECTOR AIIMS RFA No.1010/2017 4th December, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocate. versus M/s AMTRAK TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD. & ANR. .....Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.43692/2017 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.43691/2017 (for delay) This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 4 days in filing the appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 4 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.1010/2017 Page 1 of 8 RFA No.1010/2017 1. This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the defendant no.2/sole contesting defendant, impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 28.7.2017 by which the trial court has decreed t...
Tag this Judgment!Dharmender Singh vs.amit
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.1001/2017 Reserved on:29. h November, 2017 Pronounced on:4. h December, 2017 % DHARMENDER SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Charan Singh, Advocate Sharma, S.C. with Mr. Advocate. AMIT CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA versus ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Nos.43384/2017 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Nos.43381/2017 (for condonation of delay in filing) & 43382/2017 (for condonation of delay in re-filing) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 20 days in filing the appeal and 59 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. C.M.s stand disposed of. RFA No.1001/2017 and C.M. No.43383/2017 (stay) 3. This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the defendant in the suit RFA No.1001/2017 Page 1 of 10 impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 31.5.2017 ...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Kanury v. S. Rao vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:04. December, 2017 + W.P.(C) 10751/2017 & C.Ms. 44020-21/2017 DR. KANURY V. S. RAO ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.N. Kar & Mr. P.K. Kar, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC, Mr. Akshay Aggarwal & Mr. Sanjay Pal, Advocates for respondents No.1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) ORDER1 In this petition, challenge by petitioner is to the Complaint, Memorandum of Charge of 20th June, 2017 and entire inquiry proceedings. In the departmental inquiry conducted against the petitioner, it is found that charges leveled against him in the Memorandum of Charge of 20th June, 2017 stand proved. As a consequence thereof, Memorandum of 9th October, 2017 (Annexure P/1) has been served upon petitioner, to which he has filed a reply of 6th November, 2017 (Annexure P/18).2. In view of above, the challenge to the Complaint, the charges framed and the inquiry proceedings ...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Xs Productions India vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8924/2017 & CM Nos.36531-36532/2017 M/S XS PRODUCTIONS INDIA ........ Petitioner Date of Decision:04. 12.2017 Through: Mr. K.K. Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajiv Bakshi, Mr. Gagandeep Chauhan & Mr. Aviral Agnihotri, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain with Ms. Komal Pandey, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Manoj Singh & Ms. Namrata Chadha, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The writ petitioners grievance is that the eligibility criteria spelt out in the tender issued by the first respondent Ministry of Tourism, for setting up an India Pavilion in two International Trade Fairs, does not permit entertaining bids by consortiums, Joint Ventures or other association of persons and rather clarifies that only a professional agency who has an annual turnover of `8 crores can bid in the process. W.P.(C) No.8924/20...
Tag this Judgment!