Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 43 of about 598 results (0.015 seconds)Super Cassettes Industries Private Limited vs.rajasthan Infotech Media ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 554/2016 SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. K.K. Khetan, Advocate ..... Plaintiff versus RAJASTHAN INFOTECH MEDIA PVT. LTD. Through None Date of Decision:6. h December, 2017 ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, rendition of accounts, delivery up, damages etc. The prayers made in the plaint are reproduced hereinbelow:-"(i) An order of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, their officers, servants, agents, partners and representatives and all others acting for and on their behalf from either engaging in themselves or from authorizing, the recording, distributing, broadcasting, public performance/communication to the public or in any other way exploiting the cinematograph films, sound recordings and/or literary works (lyrics) and musical works (musical composition)...
Tag this Judgment!New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs.vikas Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-647 and R-650 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:06. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11682012 and CM188812012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Praveen Sehrawat and Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate versus VIKAS KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Adv. for R-1 + MAC APPEAL3462014 VIKAS KUMAR & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Adv. for A-1 versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR. Through: Mr. Praveen Sehrawat and Mr. ...... RESPONDENTS Abhishek Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Both these appeals arise out of the judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), dated 23.03.2012 in accident claim case (MACT36810/06), instituted on 31.03.2006, by Vikas Kumar, appellant in MACA3462014 and first respondent in MACA MACA11682012 & 346/2014 Page 1 of 5 1168/2012 (hereinafter referred to as the claimant). By the said judgment, the tribunal awarded compensation i...
Tag this Judgment!Savita Kumari vs.suresh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-658 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:06. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11912012 SAVITA KUMARI Through: versus SURESH AND ORS. Through: None ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for insurance company CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On the accident claim case (petition no.12/2011), instituted on 20.01.2011 by the appellant (claimant), the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), by its judgment dated 13.07.2012, awarded Rs.1,17,696/- as compensation with interest, the said amount inclusive of Rs.67,140/- towards medical expenditure, Rs.10,556/- for loss of income for two months for the period of treatment besides Rs.25,000/- on account of pain and agony and Rs.15,000/- for diet, attendant and conveyance charges.2. The appeal at hand seeks enhanced compensation. It was put in the list of Regulars as per order dated 02.02.2016. When it is called out for hearing, there is no appearance on behalf of the claimant. MACA...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Kumaar vs.shiv Steel & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decided on:06. 12.2017 + LPA7582017 RAJ KUMAAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.B. Yadav, Advocate. versus SHIV STEEL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kr. Singh, Advocate and Mr. Sunil Goel for R-2/GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.(ORAL) CM No.43670/2017 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed off. LPA7582017 & CM No.43669/2017 (condonation of delay of 22 days in filing of appeal) 1. The present appeal belatedly assails an order dated 22.08.017, whereby, a learned Single Judge of this Court had dismissed applications filed on behalf of the appellant (petitioner therein), being CM No.1462/2015, for restoration of the Writ Petition No.7760/2012 titled as Raj Kumar vs. Shiv Steel & Another (hereinafter referred to as the subject LPA7582017 Page 1 petition), which came to be dismissed in default on 28.11.2013; ...
Tag this Judgment!Ajay Kumar vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 06, 2017 (15) + W.P.(C) 7202/2017 (16) + W.P.(C) 7213/2017 (17) + W.P.(C) 7220/2017 (18) + W.P.(C) 7536/2017 & CM APPL. 31094/2017 HITENDER AJAY KUMAR VIKRANT NISHANT & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rahul Sinha and Mr. Nitin K. Gupta, Advocates Mr. Nishant Shokeen, Advocate (W.P.(C) 7536/2017) versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for respondent-UOI Mr. Manoj, Standing Counsel and Ms. Aparna Singh, Advocate for respondent-FCI Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari and Mr. Abhishek Rana, Advocate with Mr. S.C. Kashyap, Under Secretary for respondent- SSC (in W.P.(C) 7536/2017) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR W.P.(C) 7202/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 3 ORDER (ORAL) 1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above- captioned four petitions are taken up together for hearing and are being disposed of by this common order.2. In above-captioned four ...
Tag this Judgment!Atc Telecom Infrastructure Private Limited vs.reliance Communications ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. h December, 2017 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 504/2017, IA No.14109/2017 ATC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr Advocate Rao, with Mr.Krishnayan Sen, Mr.Ankit Jain, Mr.Rishad A. Choudhary, Advocates. Mr.Rajshekhar versus Through : Mr.Ravindra RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manan Shukla, Mr.Vaidhav Niti, Ms.Surabhi Limaye, Advocates for respondent no.1. Mr.Akhil Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Shivek Trehan, Advocate for respondent no.2. Shrivastava, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The respondents appear on advance notice.2. This petition is under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred as the Act) seeking prayers as per the clause (a) to (g) stated therein. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 504/2017 Page 1 of 19 3. The petitioner herein, a combined entity of Wireless TT Info Se...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Metro Transit Pvt. Ltd. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Date of decision :6. h December, 2017 $~16 to 19 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 4104/2017 and CM No.18000/2017 A B GRAIN SPIRITS PVT. LTD. & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through : Ms. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI versus ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. Rishabh Jetley and Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advs. CM No.30128/2017 in + W.P.(C) 4263/2017 M/S METRO TRANSIT PVT. LTD. Through : Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan, ........ Petitioner GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus ...... RESPONDENTS Mr. Aditya Garg, Ms. Sunanda and Mr. Arjun, Advs. Through : Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. Rishabh Jetley and Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advs. CM Nos.18748/2017 & 29892/2017 in + W.P.(C) 4297/2017 M/S ANTONY ROAD TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. Through : Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan, ........ Petitioner Mr. Aditya Garg, Ms. Sunanda and Mr. Arjun, Advs. Page 1 of 7 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD with...
Tag this Judgment!The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs.surinder Pal @ Surinder Kumar ...
Court: Delhi
$~R-656 & 657 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:06. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11872012 and CM192162012 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus SURINDER PAL @ SURINDER KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None + MAC APPEAL8322013 SURINDER PAL @ SURINDER KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: None versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first respondent in MACA11872012 (claimant) was travelling as a passenger in three wheeler scooter bearing registration no.DL-1RB-5604 on 10.10.1997 when it came to be involved in an accident turning turtle resulting in he suffering injuries. The accident MACA11872012 & 832/2013 Page 1 of 5 claim case (suit no.227/2011/1998) was instituted with all promptitude on 25.03.1998 on his behalf by his wife claiming herself to be the next friend describing him to have been rend...
Tag this Judgment!New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.sunil Sahani & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~R-651 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:6. h December, 2017 + MAC.APP. 1172/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Navdeep Singh with Mr. D.D. Singh, Advocates. Versus SUNIL SAHANI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accident claim case (Petition No.490/09), instituted on 10.10.2006, by the first respondent (the claimant) before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal was decided by judgment dated 28.07.2012 whereby compensation in the total sum of Rs.6,01,400/- was awarded, the liability having been fastened on the appellant (insurer), it having issued an insurance policy covering the third party risk in respect of the vehicle in question bearing registration No.DL-1LF-4347.2. The claim case was filed under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for injuries sustained and the permanent disability consequently suffered. The Tribunal awarded the aforesaid amount of compensation, i...
Tag this Judgment!Rajesh Khan vs.shiv Steel & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decided on:06. 12.2017 + LPA7612017 RAJESH KHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.B. Yadav, Advocate. versus SHIV STEEL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kr. Singh and Mr. Sunil Goel , Advocates for R-2/GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.(ORAL) CM No.43676/2017 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed off. LPA7612017 & CM No.43675/2017 (condonation of delay of 37 days in filing of appeal) 1. The present appeal belatedly assails an order dated 22.08.017, whereby, a learned Single Judge of this Court had dismissed applications filed on behalf of the appellant (petitioner therein), being CM No.1462/2015, for restoration of the Writ Petition No.7760/2012 titled as Raj Kumar vs. Shiv Steel & Another (hereinafter referred to as the subject petition), which came to be dismissed in default on 28.11.2013; and CM LPA76120...
Tag this Judgment!