Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 45 of about 598 results (0.019 seconds)Chandra Prakash Pandey vs.food Corporation of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~14 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 514/2017 % Date of decision :6. h December, 2017 CHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. K.B. Upadhyay and Mr. Mohit Bhandari, Advs. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS.... RESPONDENTS versus Through : Mr. Manoj, Standing Counsel for FCI with Ms. Aparna Sinha, Adv. Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. Rhishabh Jetley, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition filed in public interest litigation seeks the following prayers :-"Issue an appropriate writ of mandamus, order or (a) direction, directing the... RESPONDENTS to stop plying of trucks/trolleys/goods carrier which are being run in Delhi in violation of Rules 90(7) of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989; (b) Issue an appropriate writ of mandamus, order or direction, directing the... RESPONDENTS to stop plying of over load...
Tag this Judgment!Sadhu Prajapati vs.shiv Steel & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decided on:06. 12.2017 + LPA7602017 SADHU PRAJAPATI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.B. Yadav, Advocate. versus SHIV STEEL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kr. Singh and Mr. Sunil Goel, Advocates for R-2/GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.(ORAL) CM No.43674/2017 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed off. LPA7602017 & CM No.43673/2017 (condonation of delay of 22 days in filing of appeal) 1. The present appeal belatedly assails an order dated 22.08.017, whereby, a learned Single Judge of this Court had dismissed applications filed on behalf of the appellant (petitioner therein), being CM No.1462/2015, for restoration of the Writ Petition No.7760/2012 titled as Raj Kumar vs. Shiv Steel & Another (hereinafter referred to as the subject petition), which came to be dismissed in default on 28.11.2013; and CM LPA76...
Tag this Judgment!Santosh vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on 29th November, 2017 Order pronounced on 6th December, 2017 + BAIL APPLN. 2214/2017 SANTOSH ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with SI Manisha Sharma, PS-Aman Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 By this application filed under Section 438 of Cr. P.C., the applicant seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.503/2017 under Section 376/354D/506 of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Aman Vihar, Delhi.2. The case of the prosecution in nutshell is that about one year prior to the registration of the FIR in present case, the prosecutrix was attending the classes for beauty parlour & sewing of clothes at Mundka NGL and the applicant, who resides near her house used to follow her on the pretext that he loves her which was objected by the prosecutrix; that one ...
Tag this Judgment!Shivam Goyal vs.dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limite ...
Court: Delhi
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 06, 2017 W.P.(C) 10865/2017 & CM444962017 SHIVAM GOYAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mrs. Anjali J.Manish, Mr. Priyadarshi Manish, Ms. Raj Rajeshwari and Ms. Nidhi Saini, Advocates versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. V.S. R. Krishna, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner, who has been selected as Assistant Commandant (Electrical) in Border Security Force under the Ministry of Home Affairs, seeks No Objection Certificate (hereinafter referred to as NOC) from respondent to enable him to attend the interview, which, according to petitioners counsel, is going to be held soon.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in pursuance of Offer of Appointment of 16th February, 2015 (Annexure P-2), petitioner had joined as Executive (Electrical) Grade-E-0 in the respondent- Corporation on 5th March, 2015 and after having rendered ser...
Tag this Judgment!Prem Kumar Singh vs.govt of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~11 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10825/2016 % Date of decision :6. h December, 2017 PREM KUMAR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through :... Petitioner in person. versus GOVT OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Suparna Srivastava, CGSC with Mr. Tushar Mathur, Adv. for R-1. Mrs. Madhavi Divan, Mr. Manan Verma, Ms. Nidhi Khanna and Mr. Ayush Puri, Advs. for R-2. Mr. N.B. Abhijeet Negi, Advs. for R-3. and Mr. Joshi CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition has been filed in public interest impleading Ministry of Information and Broadcasting as respondent no.1; Press Council of India and The Indian Express Private Limited as party respondent nos.2 and 3 respectively seeking the following prayers :-"W.P.(C)No.10825/2016 Page 1 of 4 a) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus to Respondent no.3 an a directing in general to all news channels and newspapers while...
Tag this Judgment!Ashwini @ Sonu & Ors. Vs.new India Assurance Company Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~R-648 and R-649 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:06. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11702012 and CM189392012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Praveen Sehrawat and Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocates versus ASHWINI @ SONU & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Adv. for R-1 + MAC APPEAL5892013 ASHWINI @ SONU & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ... Respondent Through: Through: Mr. Praveen Sehrawat and Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Both these appeals arise out of the judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) dated 23.03.2012 on accident claim case (MACT no.367/10/06) instituted on 31.03.2006 by MACA11702012 & 589/2013 Page 1 of 6 Ashwini @ Sonu, appellant in MACA5892013 and first respondent in MACA11702012 (hereinafter referred to as the claimant). By the said judgment, the tribunal awarded compensat...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Kcl Ltd. Vs.thomson Press India Ltd
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA Nos.1007/2017 & 1014/2017 Reserved on:1. t December, 2017 Pronounced on:6. h December, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arjun Garg, Advocate with Mr. Munish Yadav, Advocate and Mr. Mohit Chandra, Advocate. Versus THOMSON PRESS INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent % 1. M/S. KCL LTD. RFA No.1007/2017 RFA No.1014/2017 2. M/S. KCL LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arjun Garg, Advocate with Mr. Munish Yadav, Advocate and Mr. Mohit Chandra, Advocate. Versus THOMSON PRESS INDIA LTD. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RFA No.1007/2017 and C.M.Nos.43567/2017 & 43568/2017 (exemption) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit RFA Nos.1007/2017 & 1014/2017 Page 1 of 16 impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 31.7.2017; by which the trial court has decreed the suit for recovery f...
Tag this Judgment!Qamar Waheed Naqvi vs.independent News Services Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~25 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :6th December, 2017 CM(M) 1389/2017 & CM Nos. 44413-44414/2017 QAMAR WAHEED NAQVI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan with Mr. Arjun Garg, Advocates. versus INDEPENDENT NEWS SERVICES PVT LTD & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: Mr. Rohan Swarup, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS for R-1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. In the course of arbitral proceedings arising out of dispute (case reference No.DAC/952/04-15) on the claim of the first respondent against him, while submitting his reply, the petitioner also presented counter-claim, statedly beyond the permissible time, the delay in which regard has been condoned by the Sole Arbitrator, by the impugned order dated 28.04.2017, subject to payment of cost of Rs.15,000/-.2. The petitioner invokes the writ jurisdiction of this Court to bring challenge to the aforesaid order, arguing he has no other remedy in law, referring in this context to dismissal as not maintainabl...
Tag this Judgment!Vivek Kumar vs.staff Selection Commission & Ors
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 06, 2017 W.P.(C) 9649/2015 VIVEK KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Sinha and Mr. Nitin K. Gupta, Advocates versus STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Sunieta Ojha and Mr. Talish Ray, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. Vide impugned order of 27th January, 2014 (Annexure P-14), petitioner has been debarred for a period of three years from taking the Staff Selection Examination and his candidature for the Combined Recruitment for Assistant Grade-III, in General, Depot, Technical and Accounts Cadres and Hindi Posts (AG-II) in Food Corporation of India Examination, 2012 has been cancelled.2. It is the case of respondents that petitioner was found to be indulging in unfair means in the said Examination. Prior to impugned order, a Show-cause Notice of 10th June, 2013 (Annexure P-5) was served upon petitioner, which was responded to by petit...
Tag this Judgment!Jai Prakash vs.shiv Steel & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decided on:06. 12.2017 + LPA7592017 JAI PRAKASH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.B. Yadav, Advocate. versus SHIV STEEL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kr. Singh, Advocate and Mr. Sunil Goel, Advocate for R- 2/GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.(ORAL) CM No.43672/2017 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed off. LPA7592017& CM No.43671/2017 (condonation of delay of 22 days in filing of appeal) 1. The present appeal belatedly assails an order dated 22.08.017, whereby, a learned Single Judge of this Court had dismissed applications filed on behalf of the appellant (petitioner therein), being CM No.1462/2015, for restoration of the Writ Petition No.7760/2012 titled as Raj Kumar vs. Shiv Steel & Another (hereinafter referred to as the subject petition), which came to be dismissed in default on 28.11.2013; and CM ...
Tag this Judgment!