Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 40 of about 598 results (0.019 seconds)New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.rishabh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-661&662 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"7th December, 2017 + MAC.APP. 1200/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus NARESH KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. + MAC.APP. 1202/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. .Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. RISHABH & ORS. . .Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 18.12.2008, a motor vehicular accident took place involving negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as motor cycle bearing registration No.DL-6S-U-2053 (motor cycle), it resulting in injuries being suffered by two persons namely, Jyoti and her one and half MAC App. No.1200/2012 & 1202/2012 Page 1 of 5 years old child Rishabh. Jyoti died as a result of the injuries sustained. The two accident claim cases came to be instituted on 21.02.2009, one (suit No.544/2011/2009) for compensation on account of death of Jyoti and the other (suit No.245/2010/200...
Tag this Judgment!Icici Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.raj Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-665 & 666 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"7th December, 2017 + MAC.APP. 1207/2012 ..... Appellant ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Ms. Suman Bagga with Ms. Anjali Chawla, Advocate. versus RAJ SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar with Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocate for R-1. + MAC.APP. 1223/2012 RAJ SINGH Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar with ..... Appellant versus Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocate for R-1. BHAGAT SINGH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Suman Bagga with Ms. Anjali Chawla, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accident claim case (Suit No.260/11) was filed by Raj Singh (the claimant) on 14.11.2008, seeking compensation for injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 10.09.2008, it involving collision between two vehicles, one a MAC App. No.1207/2012 & 1223/2012 Page 1 of 7 motorcycle bearing registration No.DL-3S-AH-4319 (the motorcycle) and, the ot...
Tag this Judgment!Himalya International Ltd vs.himalaya Drugs Company
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h December, 2017 CS(COMM) 1066/2016 HIMALYA INTERNATIONAL LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. V. Shankara, Adv. Versus HIMALAYA DRUGS COMPANY ..... Defendant Through: Ms. Prachi Agarwal & Ms. Mrinali Menon, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit for recovery of damages in the sum of Rs.1 crore from the defendant, pleading that the plaintiff has suffered commercial, business and market loss and damage to its brand name and reputation on account of defendants carelessness and negligence in filing CS(OS) No.1105/2010 of this Court and obtaining an ex parte injunction order on absolutely misconceived facts and notions and the defendant has thereby subjected the plaintiff to mala fide and vexatious litigation. It is further pleaded that owing to the said ex parte injunction obtained by the defendant in CS(OS) No.1105/2010, the plaintiff lost the market share of its product 1D...
Tag this Judgment!Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs.maruti Udyog Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA No.381/2016 Reserved on:11. h November 2017 Decided on:7. h December, 2017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ....Appellant Through: Mr. Mr. Rahul Chaudhary and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocates. versus MARUTI UDYOG LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Mr. S. Ganesh, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha, Mr. S. Sukumaran, Mr. Anand Sukumar, Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar, Ms. Roopali Gupta and Mr.Bhupesh Pathak, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH % JUDGMENT0712.2017 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.1. This is an appeal by the Revenue against the order dated 24th August 2015 passed by the ITAT in ITA Nos. 5120/Del/2010 and 2441/Del/2012 for AY200607.2. While admitting this appeal on 16th November 2016, the following questions of law were framed: Did the ITAT fall into error in cancelling the additions in respect of ITA No.381/2016 Page 1 of 2 the following:-"i) Custom Duty paid on import of components for export purposes for which export had n...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjay Jain vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on 05th December,2017 Order pronounced on 7th December,2017 + BAIL APPLN. 1752/2017 & CRL.M.A. 14404/2017 SANJAY JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ishita Jain, Advocate versus 1. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL By way of the present petition filed under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code,1973 (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.), the petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in respect of FIR No.0308 dated 21.07.2017, under Section 354/354A/506 of The Indian Penal Code,1860(hereinafter referred as IPC), registered by P.S. Jafarabad, New-Delhi.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the complaint was lodged on 21.07.2017 by one Dimple who alleged that, on 17.07.2017 at around 4 pm her brother-in-law (devar), who used to stay with her mother-in-law, had come to her house when she was alone at home and forcefully t...
Tag this Judgment!Siesta Hospitality Services Ltd. Vs.spicejet Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP (COMM) No.465/2016 Reserved on:24th November, 2017 Date of decision:07. h December, 2017 SIESTA HOSPITALITY SERVICES LTD. ........ Petitioner SPICEJET LTD. Through: Ms.Awantika Manohar, Mr.Dhawesh Pahuja, Advs. versus Through: Mr.Samrat Nigam, ...... Respondent Mr.Abhimanyu Wali, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner Siesta Hospitality Services Ltd. challenging the Arbitral Award dated 06.12.2014 passed by the Sole Arbitrator dismissing the claim filed by the petitioner holding as under :-"The Prayer of the Claimant to declare that the action of the Respondent in terminating the Agreement on 13.10.2008 was illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Agreement dated 14.02.2008 cannot be sustained as the relationship between the parties in regard to the properties at ...
Tag this Judgment!Amarjeet Singh & Ors. Vs.reliance General Insurance Company Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~R-667 & 668 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:07. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL12112012 and CM196002012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus AMARJEET SINGH & ORS. Through: None + MAC APPEAL3522013 AMARJEET SINGH & ORS. Through: None versus ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellants RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Amarjeet Singh (the claimant) had instituted accident claim case (MACT3922008) on 03.07.2009 seeking compensation for the injuries sustained and the disability consequently suffered in a motor vehicular accident that had taken place on 28.03.2009 due to negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as JCB bearing registration MACA Nos. 1211/2012 & 352/2013 Page 1 of 5 no.HR-69-8650, which was admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question with Reliance General In...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs.maruti Suzuki India Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h November, 2017 Decided on:7. h December, 2017 ITA No.171/2012 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI ...Appellant Through: Mr. Mr. Rahul Chaudhary and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocates. versus MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Mr. S. Ganesh, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha, Mr. S. Sukumaran, Mr. Anand Sukumar, Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar, Ms. Roopali Gupta and Mr.Bhupesh Pathak, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH % JUDGMENT0712.2017 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal by the Revenue against the impugned order dated 19th August 2011 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No.1927/Del/2010 for the AY200506.2. While admitting this appeal on 14th May 2013, the following questions of ITA No.171/2012 Page 1 of 3 law were framed for consideration: (1) Whether on the facts and in circumstances of case, the ITAT was correct in law in deleting the addition/ disallowance to t...
Tag this Judgment!Lalita and Anr vs.national Insurance Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~ R-663 & R-664 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:7. h December, 2017 + MAC.APP. 1201/2012 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate. versus LALITA AND ORS Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 263/2016 LALITA AND ANR Appellants Through: None. versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Mukesh Yadav, aged 31 years, suffered injuries that proved fatal, due to a motor vehicular accident, on account of negligent driving of Truck bearing registration No.HR-63-8841, admittedly insured against third party risk with National Insurance Company Limited (the insurer).2. The accident claim case (Case No.887/08), came to be registered on 28.07.2008, inter alia, on the basis of detailed accident MAC App. No.1201/2012 & 263/2016 Page 1 of 6 report (DAR) submitted by the local police, on the basis of evidence gathered during the investigation ...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Ultratech Cement Limited vs.state of Gujarat and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:01. 09.2017 Pronounced on:07. 12.2017 + W.P.(C) 6589/2016, C.M. APPL.27058/2016 M/S. ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED .... Petitioner Through: Sh. Hujefa. A. Ahmadi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Maneesha Dhir, Ms. Nina. R. Nariman, Ms. Varsha Banerjee and Sh. Kunal Godhwani, Advocates. versus STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Sh. Preetesh Kapur, Sh. Satya Brata Panda, Ms. Hemantika Wahi and Ms. Puja Singh, Advocates, for State of Gujarat. Ms. Rama Ahluwalia, Advocate, for Respondent No.6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present Writ Petition challenges an order of the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR) constituted under provisions of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, (hereafter referred to as SICA) dated 22.01.2016 where the petitioner companys claim for refund of Value Added Tax and ...
Tag this Judgment!