Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 38 of about 598 results (0.018 seconds)Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.rekha Balyan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:07. h December, 2016 + MAC.APP. 84/2015 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Ms. ........ Petitioner Shantha Devi Raman, Mr.Arbaaz Hussain, Advs. Versus REKHA BALYAN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. V.K. Vashistha, Adv. for respondents no.1 and 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.17,55,000/- has been awarded to respondents no.1 and 2.2. The accident dated 8th March, 2011 resulted in the death of the Robin Balyan. The deceased was going from Rajender Nagar to Noida on his motor cycle No.DL-13SC-6006 and was hit by truck No.HR-58-9864 on Mohan Nagar crossing at Sahibabad. The deceased was crushed under the wheels of the truck and was taken to Narender Mohan Hospital where he was declared brought dead. The deceased was aged 23 years at the time of the accident and was survived by his parents who f...
Tag this Judgment!Sunbeam Auto Private Limited vs.pr. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP (C) 8941/2015 Reserved on:11. h November 2017 Decided on:7. h December, 2017 SUNBEAM AUTO PRIVATE LIMITED ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Nagi with Mr. Vikrant A. Maheshwari, Advocates. versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Senior standing counsel. + WITH WP (C) 8943/2015 SUNBEAM AUTO PRIVATE LIMITED ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Nagi with Mr. Vikrant A. Maheshwari, Advocates. versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Senior standing counsel. WITH WP (C) 8996/2015 + SUNBEAM AUTO PRIVATE LIMITED ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Nagi with Mr. Vikrant WP (C) 8941/2015 & connected Page 1 of 4 A. Maheshwari, Advocates. versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Senior standing counsel. + AND WP (C) 9079/2015 SUNBEAM AUTO PRIVATE LIMITED ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Nagi with Mr. Vikrant A. Maheshwar...
Tag this Judgment!Rosy Dhawan vs.bureau of Indian Standards & Anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 07, 2017 + W.P.(C) 440/2016 & C.M.1751/2016 MANISH KUMAR AND + W.P.(C) 444/2016 & C.M.1758/2016 ROSY DHAWAN Through: Mr. Ajit Warrier, Advocate versus BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS & ANR .....Respondents .....Petitioners Through: Mr. B.K. Sood and Mr.Harish Gaur, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for respondent- UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 In ORDER (ORAL) the above-captioned petitions, the challenge is to two Communications of 4th January, 2016 (Annexure P-1) vide which petitioner-Manish Kumar has been transferred from HRBO, Chandigarh to EROL, Kolkata and petitioner-Rosy Dhawan has been transferred from P&C Headquarters-New Delhi, to Head (RJBO), Rajkot, Gujarat.2. While entertaining these petitions, it was directed that status quo in respect of impugned Communications be maintained.3. Since the grounds to challenge the impugned communications in the above captioned two petitions are on...
Tag this Judgment!Kusum Lata vs.delhi Transport Corporation and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~3 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)No.7572/2017 % Date of decision :7. h December, 2017 KUSUM LATA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Brajesh Pandey, Mrs. Sudha Rani Saxena and Mr. Priyanshu Upadhyay, Advs. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Aditi Gupta, Adv. for R-1/DTC. Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Adv. for R-2/GNCTD. Mr. Shambhu, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition makes a general prayer that there are some employees working in the Delhi Transport Corporation, who have submitted fake proof of age and as a result, they are continuing in service even after completing the prescribed retirement age. In this W.P.(C)No.7572/2017 Page 1 of 2 regard, the petitioner has enclosed certificates relating to one employee of the Delhi Transport Corporation.2. Ms. Aditi Gupta, ld. counsel representing the respondent no.1 - De...
Tag this Judgment!s.l.thakural vs.delhi Consumer coop.wholesale
Court: Delhi
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:07. h December, 2017 W.P.(C) 3864/2003 S.L.THAKURAL Through: Mr. R.K. Saini & Mr. Prashant ........ Petitioner Sharma, Advocates DELHI CONSUMER COOP.WHOLESALE ..... Respondent versus Through: Ms. Sujata Kashyap & Ms. Ateka Khan, Advocates with Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Law Officer CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition praying for a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the actions of the respondent in (i) not giving promotion and other consequential benefits e.g. arrears of pay and allowances, bonus etc. to the petitioner as if he was never removed from service and (ii) not paying the correct salary to the petitioner from the date of reinstatement till the date of retirement i.e. from 26.5.2000 to 30.4.2002 being illegal, arbitrary, vindictive, unjust and malafide and a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent to (i) give prom...
Tag this Judgment!Bharti Axa Gen Ins Co Ltd. Vs.fareeda & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~29 * % + MAC.APP. 666/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:07. h December, 2017 BHARTI AXA GEN INS CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mohammad Mustafa, Adv. versus FAREEDA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advs. for R1 to R6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant has challenged the award dated 7th April, 2016 passed 1. by the Claims Tribunal. The appellants are seeking reduction of the award amount.2. On 23rd June, 2011 at about 2:30 a.m., the deceased, Kosar was driving truck No.UP-12T-3151 while going from Gazipur Mandi to Karana when an Eicher Canter No.HR-38N-4511 going ahead of the vehicle suddenly stopped without giving any indication due to which the truck dashed into the canter which resulted in fatal injuries to Kosar. The deceased was survived by his widow, two sons, two daughters and father who filed an application for compensation before the Claims Tribunal.3. The deceased ...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs.m/s. Maruti Udyog Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA No.638/2009 Reserved on:11. h November 2017 Decided on:7. h December, 2017 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI ...Appellant Through: Mr. Mr. Rahul Chaudhary and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocates. versus M/S. MARUTI UDYOG LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Mr. S. Ganesh, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha, Mr. S. Sukumaran, Mr. Anand Sukumar, Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar, Ms. Roopali Gupta and Mr. Bhupesh Pathak, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT0712.2017 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal by the Revenue against the impugned order dated 5th September 2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No.1438/Del/2004 for the AY200001.2. While admitting this appeal on 28th January 2010, the following question of law was framed for consideration: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) erred in deleting the addition of Rs ITA No 638/2009 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!r.l.traders vs.income Tax Officer Ward 47(1)
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:07. 12.2017 + ITA3842017 R.L.TRADERS Through: Mr. K.R. Manjani with Mr. V.K. Manjani, Advs. ..... Appellant versus INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD471) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Anand Chaudhuri, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The assessees appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter referred to as the Act) characterizes the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which upheld the order of the Appellate Commissioner, as perverse. The assessee for A.Y. 2007-08, faced addition of `1,34,584/-, under Section 68 of the Act. This was based upon entries shown as cash credits. Apparently, the AO during the course of proceedings had summoned and recorded the statement of the creditor who admitted accommodating the assessee, in exchange of cash and after conceding that the t...
Tag this Judgment!Anil Kumar Rathore & Anr. Vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7874/2016 % Reserved on:10. h October, 2017 Date of Decision:7. h December, 2017 ANIL KUMAR RATHORE & ANR. Through ........ Petitioner Mr. A.K. Singh, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, Central Government Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.Anil Kumar Rathore and Sanjaya Kumar Tripathy by this writ petition seek ante dating of their promotion to the post of Sub- Inspector/General Duty pursuant to the Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE) held in the year 2007. They claim entitlement to similar treatment and benefit as was given to Mahesh Kumar Nitharwal. Another prayer made is that they should be paid consequential monetary benefits and arrears with seniority.2. The two petitioners, who were working as Constables in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), had appeared in the LDCE-2007. They W...
Tag this Judgment!The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs.mamta Bhasin & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-673 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:07. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL12252012 and CM199812012 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus MAMTA BHASIN & ORS. Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The liability to pay compensation on account of death of Anoop Bhasin, in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 21.08.2007, had been fastened on the appellant (insurer) by judgment dated 03.10.2012, of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) on the accident claim case (petition no.1391/2008) of first to sixth respondents (collectively, the claimants), on the basis of finding that the said event had occurred due to negligent driving of a truck bearing registration no.HR-38-BG-5623 which was insured against third party risk with the appellant.2. The insurer presses the appeal to question the said finding on the issue of negligence. MAC Appeal No.1225/20...
Tag this Judgment!