Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 46 of about 598 results (0.018 seconds)Roshan Alias Rohan vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 2317/2017 Order reserved on :24. h November, 2017 Order pronounced on :6. h December, 2017 ROSHAN @ ROHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Biswajit Kumar Patra, Advocate. Versus STATE ..Respondent Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the State with ASI Mahesh Kumar, Crime Branch. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 This is an application under Section 439 Cr.PC seeking grant of interim bail for a period of 3 months in case FIR No.378/2014 under Section 395/394/397 IPC registered at Police Station Lahori Gate on the ground of repair his dilapidated house.2. An FIR has been registered in the instant case on the complaint of Gaurav Rathi, a dry fruits wholesale commission agent alleging that on 09.12.2014 at about 6:15 p.m., four assailants entered his office and robbed Rs.1.15 Crores at the gun point after tying him with ropes; that in his supplementary statement, the complainant mentioned that the exact robbed amount w...
Tag this Judgment!Vikas Kumar & Ors. Vs.new India Assurance Company Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~R-647 and R-650 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:06. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11682012 and CM188812012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Praveen Sehrawat and Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate versus VIKAS KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Adv. for R-1 + MAC APPEAL3462014 VIKAS KUMAR & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Adv. for A-1 versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR. Through: Mr. Praveen Sehrawat and Mr. ...... RESPONDENTS Abhishek Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Both these appeals arise out of the judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), dated 23.03.2012 in accident claim case (MACT36810/06), instituted on 31.03.2006, by Vikas Kumar, appellant in MACA3462014 and first respondent in MACA MACA11682012 & 346/2014 Page 1 of 5 1168/2012 (hereinafter referred to as the claimant). By the said judgment, the tribunal awarded compensation i...
Tag this Judgment!The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs.avik Sadana & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-659 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:06. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11952012 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate ..... Appellant Through: versus AVIK SADANA & ORS. Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On the accident claim case (MACT no.1222/2010), instituted by the first respondent (claimant) on 30.11.2010, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) awarded compensation in his favour for injuries sustained and permanent disability suffered, due to a motor vehicular accident that had taken place on 02.02.2010, due to negligent driving of the vehicle insured with the appellant (insurer), fastening the liability upon it to pay with interest at the rate of 12% p.a.2. The appeal is pressed to take exception to the rate of interest levied by the tribunal.3. Indeed, no special reasons have been set out for levy of such rate of interest. It is unduly high. Following the consistent vie...
Tag this Judgment!Ravi and Singh Communication vs.sify Technologies Limited
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:6. h December, 2017 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 192/2017 RAVI AND SINGH COMMUNICATION ..... Appellant Through Mr. Pravir K. Jain, Adv. versus SIFY TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amitesh C. Mishra, Adv. and Mr. Pankaj Singh Adv. for respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 8th August, 2017 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court by which, the written statement filed by the defendant has been taken on record on payment of cost of Rs.50,000/-. It is also the grievance of the appellant that on 8th August, 2017 time was extended for filing the written statement beyond the prescribed period of 120 days.2. Mr. Jain relies on a decision rendered by the Single Judge of this Court in the case of OKU Tech Private Limited vs. Sangeet Agarwal and Ors. CS (OS) 3390/2015, decided on 11th August, 2016,...
Tag this Judgment!Societe Des Produits Nestle s.a & Anr. Vs.kaira District Co-Operative ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. h December, 2017 CS(OS) 1675/2012 SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A & ANR .....Plaintiffs Versus KAIRA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Hemant Singh with Ms. Mamta R. Jha, Mr. Manish K. Mishra and Mr. Waseem Shuaib Ahmed, Advocates For the... RESPONDENTS : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Snehal Kakrania, Advocate JUDGEMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J IA No.10759/2012 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & CPC) 1. The Plaintiff by this application seeks a restraint on the Defendants from manufacturing, packaging, selling, offering for sale, advertising directly or indirectly dealing in cheese, packaged milk or any other milk products under the Trademark A+ with or without any prefix or suffix or any other mark as may be identical to or CS(OS) 1675/2012 Page 1 of 9 deceptively si...
Tag this Judgment!Mukesh Kumar vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
$~1-4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on 1st December,2017 Order pronounced on 5th December,2017 + + + + versus CRL.M.C. 849/2017 BIRENDER SINGH YADAV C B I CRL.M.C. 930/2017 RAVINDER SINGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIO CRL.M.C. 934/2017 SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION versus versus CRL.M.C. 935/2017 MUKESH KUMAR CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Present: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate, Mr. Manish Tiwari, Mr.Anil Kumar, Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocates for the petitioner with petitioner in person in Crl.M.C. No.849/2017. Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.K. Mittal & Ms. Rachna Maheshwari, Advocates for the petitioner in Crl.M.C. Nos.930/2017, 934/2017 & 935/2017. Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Advocate for the CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL CRL.M.C. 849/2017 & conne...
Tag this Judgment!Adigear International & Anr. Vs.subhash Aggarwal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:27. h November, 2017 Pronounced on:5. h December, 2017 ARB. A. (COMM.) 23/2017, IA No.10003/2017 ADIGEAR INTERNATIONAL & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.Hrishikesh Baruah, Mr.Pranav Jha, Gupta, Mr.Siddhant Kaushik, Advocates. Ms.Radhika versus SUBHASH AGGARWAL & ORS. + ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Siddharth Vaid, Ms.Soumya Sai Kumar, Ms.Madhurima Ghosh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The petitioner has filed this appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the orders dated 07.05.2017 and 08.05.2017 passed by the Learned Sole Arbitrator wherein the appellants have been directed to furnish bank guarantee of Rs. 6.5 Crores in favour of the... RESPONDENTS to be kept alive for a period of six months from the date of the order or disposal of the arbitral proceedings by an award whichever is earlier and that the respondent Arb.A.Comm.23/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Baljinder Kaur @ Baljit Kaur & Ors. Vs.bajaj Allianz General Insurance ...
Court: Delhi
BALJINDER KAUR @ BALJIT KAUR & ORS. Through: None + MAC APPEAL1972016 BALJINDER KAUR @ BALJIT KAUR & ORS. Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellants $~R-641 & 642 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:05. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11472012 and CM185352012 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Bagga and Ms. Anjali Chawla, Advocates versus Versus BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Suman Bagga and Ms. Anjali Chawla, Advocates for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Surjit Singh was travelling in a Maruti Van bearing registration no.DL-3CZ-1437 (van), driven by Sumit Kumar (driver), a respondent MAC Appeal No.1147/2012 & 197/2016 Page 1 of 5 in these appeals on 08.07.2003, the van carrying several other persons. It came to be involved in a collision at about 02.00 hours with a truck bearing registration no.UP-30A-0768 (truck). As a result, Surjit S...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Atv Projects (India) Ltd vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4340/2017 Reserved on :10. h November, 2017 Date of decision :5. h December, 2017 ........ Petitioner M/S ATV PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD Through: Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kuljeet Rawal, Mr. Saurabh Malhotra, Mr. Sohil Yadav & Mr. Tushar Bhardwaj, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Mr. Waize Ali Noor & Mr. Momin Khan, Advocates for R-1. Mr. D.R. Senior Standing Counsel alongwith Mrs. Sapna Jain Advocate for R-3. Mr. Rohit Bhagat, Advocate for Mr. Saurabh Chadda, Advocate for R-5. Jain, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh J., The petitioner ATV Projects (India) Pvt. Ltd. has filed the present writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of W.P.(C) 4340/2017 Page 1 of 17 Section 4(b) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, 2003 (hereinafter R...
Tag this Judgment!K K Kamal & Ors. Vs.national Insurance Co. Ltd
Court: Delhi
K K KAMAL & ORS. Through: + MAC APPEAL4132011 K K KAMAL & ORS. Through: versus ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant $~R-55A & 336 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + MAC APPEAL5822008 Decided on:5. h December, 2017 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur & Mr. Amit Gaur, Adv versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur & Mr. Amit Gaur, Adv CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The claimant had suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident 1. that took place on 19.01.2006 involving negligent driving by the driver of offending vehicle i.e. Bus bearing registration No.DL1PA MAC Appeal Nos. 582/2008 & 413/2011 Page 1 of 6 5917. Accident claim case 2was instituted on 25.05.2006. The tribunal held an enquiry and, by judgment dated 02.08.2008, accepted the case for compensation under section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 holding Shanker (respondent) responsible for negligent driving and causing the sai...
Tag this Judgment!