Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 44 of about 598 results (0.014 seconds)Oriental Bank of Commerce vs.harminder Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO Nos. 303/2017 & 305/2017 + % 1. ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE FAO No.303/2017 6th December, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.A. Khan, Adv. with Mr. Shadab Khan, Adv. versus HARMINDER SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Talwar, Adv. with Mr. Diwakar Singh, Adv. FAO No.305/2017 2. ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.A. Khan, Adv. with Mr. Shadab Khan, Adv. versus HARMINDER SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Talwar, Adv. with Mr. Diwakar Singh, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) Review Petition No.321/2017 in FAO No.303/2017 Review Petition No.317/2017 in FAO No.305/2017 1. These review petitions have been preferred by the respondent no.1 in the appeals. Respondent no.1 in the appeals is the FAO Nos.303/2017 & 305/2017 Page 1 of 17 plaintiff in the two suits filed in the trial court. Review petitions are file...
Tag this Judgment!Amit Chhikara vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 06, 2017 W.P.(C) 10824/2017 AMIT CHHIKARA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Sinha and Mr. Nitin K. Gupta, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi and Mr. A.S. Sinha, Advocates for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. Manoj, Standing Counsel and Ms. Aparna Sinha, Advocate for respondent-FCI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. In this petition, quashing of Show-cause Notice of 14th June, 2013 (Annexure P-1) is sought and non-consideration of petitioner for appointment on the post of AG-III (General) is also under challenge.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that impugned Show-cause Notice of 14th June, 2013 (Annexure P-1) has been duly replied vide Reply (Annexure P-2). Learned counsel for petitioner submits that similar Show-cause Notices were subject matter before this Courts Division Bench decision in Staff Selection Commissioner ...
Tag this Judgment!Gurpreet Singh Ahluwalia vs.aman Khorana
Court: Delhi
FAO(OS) 300/2017 and CM No.43209/2017 $~6 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % GURPREET SINGH AHLUWALIA Through : Mr. Sanjeev Anand and ..... Appellant Date of decision :6. h December, 2017 versus Mr. Akshay Kapoor, Advs. AMAN KHORANA Through : Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that this appeal had to be filed for the reason that by the interim ex-parte order dated 1st November, 2017, the learned Single Judge had directed the appellant to maintain status quo with regard to title and possession of the entire property bearing No.F-3, Kailash Colony, New Delhi- 110048.2. It is submitted by the appellant that the suit filed by the respondent is for recovery of only Rs.2.15 crores out of which the respondent has allegedly paid Rs.1.70 crores to the appellant. FAO(OS)No.300/2017 Page 1 of 3 3. The ...
Tag this Judgment!New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs.ashwini @ Sonu & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-648 and R-649 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:06. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11702012 and CM189392012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Praveen Sehrawat and Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocates versus ASHWINI @ SONU & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Adv. for R-1 + MAC APPEAL5892013 ASHWINI @ SONU & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ... Respondent Through: Through: Mr. Praveen Sehrawat and Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Both these appeals arise out of the judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) dated 23.03.2012 on accident claim case (MACT no.367/10/06) instituted on 31.03.2006 by MACA11702012 & 589/2013 Page 1 of 6 Ashwini @ Sonu, appellant in MACA5892013 and first respondent in MACA11702012 (hereinafter referred to as the claimant). By the said judgment, the tribunal awarded compensat...
Tag this Judgment!Rani vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on 23rd November, 2017 Order pronounced on 6th December, 2017 + BAIL APPLN. 2394/2017 RANI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arpit Bhalla, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with SI Sunder Police Station- Baba Haridas Nagar, New Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL The present application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.1. seeking Regular Bail in case FIR No.170/2017 under Section 365/387/377/379/506/3Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Baba Haridas Nagar, New Delhi.2. The instant case was registered on the complaint of the Ramesh Khatri alleging that on 28.08.2017 at about 9:00. PM he received a call from the applicant to meet her at Nangloi Stand, Najafgarh; that the complainant reached there in his car and the applicant sat on the front seat in the car and asked the complainant to accompany her to her house; that...
Tag this Judgment!Jk Jute Mill Mazdoor Ekta Union vs.uoi and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~32 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :6. h December, 2017 W.P.(C) 440/2017 with CM APPL. Nos. 2004/2017 (Stay), 19772/2017, 24080/2017 (Impleadment), 19774/2017, 29721/2017 (Status quo), 24633/2017 (Vacation of order dated 06.07.2017) 24769/2017 (Modification of order 06.07.2017) 29726/2017 (Directions). JK JUTE MILL MAZDOOR EKTA UNION ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Sanjeev Sen, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ashok Kumar Jain, Mr.Ankit Kohli, Mr. Dipankar, Advocates. Atishi UOI AND ORS versus Through : Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for ........ RESPONDENTS S. Chaddha, UOI/R1. Ms. Indrani Mukherjee, Advocate for IDBI/R2. Mr. Chetan Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms.Purti Marwaha Gupta, Mr.Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocates for R3/ M/s J.K. Senior Mr. Amit Advocate with Mr.Atanu Mukherjee, Advocate for R6. Mr. Senior Advocate with Mr.Harsh Sharma, Advocate for R7/Thapar Herbs & Spices. Mr. Sachin Dutta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Shakil Ahmed, Advocate for R21/Libra Retailers ...
Tag this Judgment!New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs.nishant Parveen & Ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 06, 2017 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocate ..... Appellant * + MAC.APP. 191/2015 + MAC.APP. 877/2015 Versus Versus NISHANT PARVEEN & ORS. Through: Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS NISHANT PARVEEN & ORS. Through: Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate ..... Appellants RAJU @ REYAJUDEEN & ORS (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD). Through: Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR C.M. 27229/2015 in MAC.APP. 877/2015 JUDGMENT ORAL Delay of 192 days in filing the accompanying appeal is condoned for the reasons stated in the application. The application is allowed and is accordingly disposed of. MAC. APP. 191/2015 MAC.APP.877/2015 Page 1 of 5 MAC.APP. 191/2015 & C.M. 3326/2015 MAC.APP. 877/2015 1. Above captioned two appeals arise out of common impugned Award of 05th January, 2015, vide which compensation of `9,48,103/- with interest at 9% per an...
Tag this Judgment!Satya Narain vs.shiv Steel & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decided on:06. 12.2017 + LPA7622017 SATYA NARAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.B. Yadav, Advocate. versus SHIV STEEL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kr. Singh and Mr. Sunil Goel, Advocates for R-2/GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.(ORAL) CM No.43678/2017 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed off. LPA7622017 & CM No.43677/2017 (condonation of delay of 22 days in filing of appeal) 1. The present appeal belatedly assails an order dated 22.08.017, whereby, a learned Single Judge of this Court had dismissed applications filed on behalf of the appellant (petitioner therein), being CM No.1462/2015, for restoration of the Writ Petition No.7760/2012 titled as Raj Kumar vs. Shiv Steel & Another (hereinafter referred to as the subject petition), which came to be dismissed in default on 28.11.2013; and CM LPA76220...
Tag this Judgment!Goverdhan Trasnport Co Pvt Ltd vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Date of decision :6. h December, 2017 $~16 to 19 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 4104/2017 and CM No.18000/2017 A B GRAIN SPIRITS PVT. LTD. & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through : Ms. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI versus ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. Rishabh Jetley and Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advs. CM No.30128/2017 in + W.P.(C) 4263/2017 M/S METRO TRANSIT PVT. LTD. Through : Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan, ........ Petitioner GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus ...... RESPONDENTS Mr. Aditya Garg, Ms. Sunanda and Mr. Arjun, Advs. Through : Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. Rishabh Jetley and Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advs. CM Nos.18748/2017 & 29892/2017 in + W.P.(C) 4297/2017 M/S ANTONY ROAD TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. Through : Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan, ........ Petitioner Mr. Aditya Garg, Ms. Sunanda and Mr. Arjun, Advs. Page 1 of 7 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD with...
Tag this Judgment!New India Assurance Company Ltd vs.nirmala Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-653 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"6th December, 2017 + MAC.APP.1181/2012 & CM No.19072/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Appellant Through: None. versus NIRMALA DEVI & ORS. Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) ........ RESPONDENTS 1. The accident claim case (MACT No.24/11), was decided by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, by judgment dated 25.08.2012, whereby compensation in the sum of Rs.13,34,536/- has been awarded with interest @ 12% per annum, in favour of the first to fourth respondents (collectively, the claimants), on account of death of Dhina Kamti, in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 18.08.2010, due to negligence on the part of the driver of vehicle insured with the appellant (insurer).2. The Tribunal included in the above said award Rs.8,64,536/- towards loss of dependency, Rs.50,000/- for loss of consortium, Rs.20,000/- towards funeral charges, Rs.1,00,000/- each for loss of estate and loss of c...
Tag this Judgment!