Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ajay Kumar vs.union of India and Ors

Ajay Kumar vs Union of India and Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Dec 06, 2017
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1211172

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajay Kumar

Respondent

Union of India and Ors

Excerpt

.....i.e. combined recruitment for assistant grade-iii, in general, depot, technical and accounts cadres and hindi posts (ag-ii).3. learned counsel for petitioners submits that impugned show-cause notices have been duly replied and respondent-staff selection commission is required to withdraw these show-cause notices in view of this court’s division bench decision in staff selection commissioner & anr. v. sudesh 2014 scc online del 7534, which has been affirmed by supreme court in its decision of 19th july, 2017 in civil appeal no(s). 2836-2838/2017 titled staff selection commission, thr. its chairman & anr. v. sudesh.4. in the facts and circumstances of this case, these petitions are disposed of with direction to respondent-staff selection commission to withdraw impugned show-cause notices in light of this court’s division w.p.(c) 7202/2017 & connected matters page 2 of 3 bench decision in sudesh (supra), which has been affirmed by supreme court in its decision of 19th july, 2017, and in case they choose not to do so and decide to proceed further in accordance with law, if such an occasion arises, then the reasons for adopting such a course be indicated in the decision so taken, within six weeks and its outcome be intimated to petitioners within two weeks thereafter, so that petitioners may avail of remedies as available in law, if need be.5. with aforesaid directions, these petitions and the application are disposed of.6. copy of this order be given dasti to both the sides to ensure its compliance. (sunil gaur) judge december06 2017 s w.p.(c) 7202/2017 & connected matters page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 06, 2017 (15) + W.P.(C) 7202/2017 (16) + W.P.(C) 7213/2017 (17) + W.P.(C) 7220/2017 (18) + W.P.(C) 7536/2017 & CM APPL. 31094/2017 HITENDER AJAY KUMAR VIKRANT NISHANT & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rahul Sinha and Mr. Nitin K. Gupta, Advocates Mr. Nishant Shokeen, Advocate (W.P.(C) 7536/2017) versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for respondent-UOI Mr. Manoj, Standing Counsel and Ms. Aparna Singh, Advocate for respondent-FCI Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari and Mr. Abhishek Rana, Advocate with Mr. S.C. Kashyap, Under Secretary for respondent- SSC (in W.P.(C) 7536/2017) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR W.P.(C) 7202/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 3 ORDER (ORAL) 1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above- captioned four petitions are taken up together for hearing and are being disposed of by this common order.

2. In above-captioned four petitions, the challenge is to impugned Show-cause Notices (Annexure P-1) [Annexure P-1 colly. in W.P.(C) 7536/2017]., which have been issued to petitioners on account of their adopting unfair means in Food Corporation of India Examination, 2012 i.e. combined recruitment for Assistant Grade-III, in General, Depot, Technical and Accounts Cadres and Hindi Posts (AG-II).

3. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that impugned Show-cause Notices have been duly replied and respondent-Staff Selection Commission is required to withdraw these Show-cause Notices in view of this Court’s Division Bench decision in Staff Selection Commissioner & Anr. v. Sudesh 2014 SCC OnLine Del 7534, which has been affirmed by Supreme Court in its decision of 19th July, 2017 in Civil Appeal No(s). 2836-2838/2017 titled Staff Selection Commission, Thr. its Chairman & Anr. v. Sudesh.

4. In the facts and circumstances of this case, these petitions are disposed of with direction to respondent-Staff Selection Commission to withdraw impugned Show-cause Notices in light of this Court’s Division W.P.(C) 7202/2017 & connected matters Page 2 of 3 Bench decision in Sudesh (supra), which has been affirmed by Supreme Court in its decision of 19th July, 2017, and in case they choose not to do so and decide to proceed further in accordance with law, if such an occasion arises, then the reasons for adopting such a course be indicated in the decision so taken, within six weeks and its outcome be intimated to petitioners within two weeks thereafter, so that petitioners may avail of remedies as available in law, if need be.

5. With aforesaid directions, these petitions and the application are disposed of.

6. Copy of this order be given dasti to both the sides to ensure its compliance. (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE DECEMBER06 2017 s W.P.(C) 7202/2017 & connected matters Page 3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial