Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
B. Prabakar Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District and An ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to register a case on the petitioner complaint dated 19.08.2015 within stipulated time fixed by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent to register a case on the petitioner complaint dated 19.08.2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that the complaint given by the petitioner has been forwarded to the Inspector of Police, Palani Town Police Station. 3. Hence, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Inspector of Police, Palani Town Police Station and lodge a fresh complaint containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 19.08.2015. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop...
Shahul Hameed Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Commissioner Office, Tri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to register a case on the basis of the petitioner complaint dated 07.03.2016 within the time as stipulated by this Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to register a case on the basis of the petitioner complaint dated 07.03.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 07.03.2016, it is seen that one person by name Mathivanan had called the petitioner and abused him in intemperate language, in respect of which, the petitioner has sent the said complaint by post. 4. In the considered opinion of this Court, this is not a fit case to direct the respondent police to register an FIR. Hence, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law....
S. Manimegalai Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai and Anothe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 21.02.2016 and to investigate and to file final report within a stipulated time.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 21.02.2016 and to investigate and to file final report. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.34 of 2016. 3. In view of the above submission, the respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to cooperate in the enquiry. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall take...
M. Nilofar Nisha Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint preferred to the 1st respondent by the petitioner dated 27.2.2016 against the proposed accused persons for the offences punishable U/s.147, 148, 294(b), 341, 354, 447 and 506(i) IPC of Sec.4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint preferred to the 1st respondent by the petitioner dated 27.2.2016 against the proposed accused persons for the offences punishable U/s.147, 148, 294(b), 341, 354, 447 and 506(i) IPC of Sec.4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 27.02.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person...
Jayaprakash Vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Coimbatore
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the conviction and sentence passed by the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, in S.C.No.249 of 2012 dated 30.01.2013.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.249 of 2012 on the file of the III Additional Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. He stood charged for offences under Sections 449, 302 and 397 of IPC. The trial court, by judgment dated 30.01.2013, convicted the sole accused under all three charges and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years for offence under Section 449 of IPC; to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years for offence under Section 302 of IPC ; and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years for offence under Section 397 of IPC. Challenging the said convic...
Muniyasamy Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to register a case against the accused on the representation dated 16.02.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to register a case against the accused on the representation dated 16.02.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. It is seen that earlier this petitioner had given a complaint, in which petition enquiry was conducted in CSR No.542 of 2015 and the same was closed on 17.10.2015. Thereafter, the petitioner has sent the 2nd / present complaint dated 16.02.2016 to the Superintendent of Police, containing the same set of allegations. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR on the complaint dated 16.02.2016. 4. Therefore, this petition is closed. A copy of the closure report in respect of the earlier complaint is furnish...
The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary School Education Departm ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order of the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. (MD) No25935 of 2011 dated 21.08.2012.) Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order of the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(MD).No. 25935 of 2011 dated 21.08.2012, Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to provide employment to the petitioner as a full time scavenger with the 5th respondent school on regular basis with effect from 11.12.1998 and pay all the backwages and other attendant and consequential benefits.) Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J. 1. Heard the learned Addl. Government Pleader appearing for the appellants and the learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent. 2. Learned single Judge, by impugned order dated 21.8.2012, while allowing the writ petition, directed the respondents/appellants herein to regularise the services of the petit...
Rathinakumar Vs. The Deputy Chairman and Estate Officer, V.O. Chidamba ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the order of terminating the allotment order issued by the respondent in his proceedings in E(C)/F37/06/2013/Estate/D.200 dated 05.04.2016 and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the order of terminating the allotment order issued by the respondent in his proceedings in E(C)/F37/06/2013/Estate/D.200 dated 05.04.2016. 2. This matter is purely contractual in nature. A contract has been cancelled on the policy decision taken in order to maintain law and order in and around the beach area of Zone-A. The respondent has also given time upto 01.05.2016. Therefore, this Court cannot interfere with the contractual matter. 3. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that there is an arbitration clause. Whateve...
Raju @ Periyasamy Konar Vs. Chella Mariappan and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer in S.A.(MD)No.289 of 2016: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.35 of 2007, on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi, dated 11.04.2008, confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.18 of 2006 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Tenkasi, dated 14.03.2007.) Common Judgment: 1. The appellant herein, who is the unsuccessful defendant in the suit in O.S.No.18 of 2006, which was filed for permanent injunction, has come up with S.A.(MD).No.289 of 2016, challenging the concurrent findings rendered by the Courts below. 2. Likewise, the appellant herein, who is the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.482 of 2004, which was filed for permanent injunction, has come up with S.A.(MD).No.290 of 2016, challenging the findings of the Lower Appellate Court in partly setting aside the judgment and decree of the Trial Court and thereby, allowed the appeal in part. 3. The case of the plainti...
T. Mahesh Vs. The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to take the complaint dated 19.02.2016 made by the petitioner into investigation and register the same in accordance with law and pass such further or orders as it may deem fit and proper circumstances of the case and thus render justice.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent to take the complaint dated 19.02.2016 made by the petitioner into investigation and register the same in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 19.02.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 19.03.2016. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the pe...