Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gopal Vs. State rep. by The Inspector of Police Sipcot Police Station, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the Judgment passed in S.C.No.163/2003, dated 29.07.2004, by the learned I Additional District Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri.) P. Kalaiyarasan, J. This criminal appeal is against the Judgment, dated 29.07.2004 made in S.C.No.163 of 2003 on the file of the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri. 2. The appellant is the Accused No.1 in S.C.No.163 of 2003. By Judgment, dated 29.07.2004, the trial Court, while acquitting the second accused for the charge under Section 302 r/w 109 IPC, convicted the appellant herein / first accused for the offence under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to undergo Life Imprisonment and also to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for one year. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the first accused has come forward with this appeal. 3. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows : (a) The deceased Chinna...
V. Sundara Mohan Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 03.03.2016 and investigate the same and file a final report.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 03.03.2016 and investigate the same and file a final report. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 03.03.2016, the dispute essentially appears to be civil in nature between the petitioner and his brother in law Varadarajan. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. 4. Therefore, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manne...
K.S. Raja Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st respondent to transfer the investigation in the case of Crime No.671 of 2015 dated 17.12.2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent police to some other impartial investigating agency.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to transfer the investigation in the case of Crime No.671 of 2015 dated 17.12.2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent police to some other impartial investigating agency. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that the case in Othakadai Police Station Crime No.671 of 2015 has been transferred to the file of Assistant Superintendent of Police, Madurai Rural on the orders of the Superintendent of Police. 3. Recording the said submission, this petition is closed....
S. Jothiramalingam and Others Vs. The Executive Officer/Joint Commissi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent herein from in any way evicting the petitioners from their shops situated comprised in Survey Nos.878/1, 878/6, 878/4, 872/2 and 878/7 respectively situated at West Ratha Veedhi/West Giri Veedhi, Adivaram, Palani, Dindigul District without following the due process of law.) Common Order: N. Kirubakaran, J. 1. It is yet another attempt made by the petitioners generation after generation to make Lord Palaniyandi of Palani as "real Aandi." 2. The petitioners are the occupants of the properties comprised in Survey Nos.878/1, 878/6, 878/4, 872/2 and 878/7 located opposite to Arulmigu Dhandayuthapani Swamy Thirukkovil, Palani, as per the pattas. According to the petitioners the lands comprised in Survey Nos. 878/1, 878/6, 878/4, 872/2 and 878/7 are being enjoyed by the petitioners and their ancestors were the predecessors in title continuously for many...
K. Ragulan Vs. The Inspector of Police, Thanjavur
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent to register an FIR on basis of the complaint of the petitioner dated 03.03.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 03.03.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 08.04.2016. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
M. Karunakaran Vs. The Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 19.02.2015 and 13.03.2015 and 07.05.2015 and to investigate the same in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 19.02.2015 and 13.03.2015 and 07.05.2015 and to investigate the same in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.368 of 2015. 3. In view of the above submission, the 2nd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall co-operate in the enquiry. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent polic...
Dhanushkodi Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and Ano ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 7.3.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 7.3.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 07.03.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 07.03.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop action otherwise. With the above direction, this Criminal...
P. Ravichandran Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 08.03.2016 and investigate the case in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 08.03.2016 and investigate the case in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 08.03.2016, it is alleged by the petitioner that the opposite party threatened him on 07.02.2016 saying that he will create a promissory note for Rs.2,00,000/- as if the petitioner has executed the same and he will file suits against him in various Courts. 4. The allegation in the complaint appears to be very vague and hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. Hence, this petition ...
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd., Chennai Vs. Namita Panda ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2014 made in M.C.O.P.No.547 of 2011 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Principal District Judge at Perambalur.) Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the Insurer of the offending lorry in question challenging the Award dated 30.06.2014 made in M.C.O.P.No.547 of 2011 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Principal District Judge at Perambalur. 2. It is a case of fatal accident. On 21.07.2011 at about 5.15 a.m., the deceased Subhabrata Panda started from his house to the working place. While he was passing the Saibaba Temple, an Eicher medium goods vehicle bearing Registration No.TN-20-AM-0612 belonging to the first respondent herein and insured with the appellant herein, which was coming in the Trichy-Chennai direction, driven in a rash and negligent manner, dashed against the said Subhabrata Panda and the wheels of the said...
Nari @ Duraisamy Vs. The State Represented by Inspector of Police, CBC ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C., to suspend the sentence of imprisonment passed in S.C.No.48 of 2015 dated 6.1.2016 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Ariyalur and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the Criminal Appeal.) The sole accused in the Sessions Case in S.C.No.48 of 2015 on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Ariyalur seeks suspension of his sentence of imprisonment. 2. In the said Court, after trial, the accused was convicted and sentenced as under:- ad>Conviction Sentence Section 341 IPCS.I for one month and fine Rs.500/-, i/d one week S.ISection 342 IPCR.I for 6 months and fine Rs.1,000/-, i/d one month S.ISection 323 IPCR.I for 6 months and fine Rs.1,000/-, i/d one month R.ISection 366 IPCR.I for 5 years and fine Rs.5,000/-, i/d one year R.ISection 354 IPCR.I for 2 years and fine Rs.5,000/-, i/d 6 months R.ISection 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Wome...