Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India rep.by The General Manager Southern Railway Chennai and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent in O.A.No.913 of 2010 including the order dated 29.09.2011 and to quash the same.) Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J. The prayer in the writ petition is for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent in O.A.No.913 of 2010 including the order dated 29.09.2011 and to quash the same. 2. The brief facts of the case runs as follows: (i) While the petitioner was working as Station Master Grade-II at Singaperumal Koil Railway Station, he was entrusted with two duties, viz., (i) operating duties, i.e., duties in connection with reception and dispatch of trains and (ii) commercial duties, i.e., regarding issuance of tickets to the required destination when booking clerks were not available. During the relevant period from 26.05.2004 to 01.06.2004, when the regular Commercial Clerk working in the...
Sathyamoorthy and Others Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu Chennai rep. by S ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of declaration to declare that the entire acquisition proceedings with respect to the petitioners' lands of an extent of 2.01 acres in S.F.Nos.340, 343 (part) and 344, situated at Telegupalayam Village, Coimbatore District, pursuant to the notification issued under section 4(1) of the Act in G.O.Ms.No.820, Housing and Urban Development Department dated 17.08.1982, and consequential declaration made under section 6 of the Act,in G.O.Ms.No.843, Housing and Urban Development Department dated 23.08.1985, issued by the first respondent and the proceedings of the second respondent in LA No.13/81, dated 04.12.1987 as null and void and non est law.) 1. Heard Mr.R.N.Amarnath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Mr.R.Rajeswaran, learned Special Government Pleader, appearing notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.B.Vivekavanan, Counsel appearing for the third respondent and ...
Allapichai Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 17.3.2016 on the file of the respondent police and to investigate the same in accordance with law and also issue suitable direction against the 1st respondent to supervise the whole investigation.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 17.3.2016 on the file of the respondent police and to investigate the same in accordance with law and also issue suitable direction against the 1st respondent to supervise the whole investigation. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 17.03.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh compl...
A. Latha Vs. The Superintendent of Police, The Inspector of Police, An ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents herein to register FIR on the basis of the complaint dated 4.12.2015 made by the petitioner herein and investigate the matter in accordance with law and file final report before the concerned J.M. within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents herein to register an FIR on the basis of the complaint dated 04.12.2015 made by the petitioner herein and investigate the matter in accordance with law and file final report before the concerned Magistrate Court 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 04.12.2015, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 30.03.2016. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner ...
D. Palanivel Vs. P.L. Jayalakshmi
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. with a prayer to call for the records to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.87 of 2015 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, pending on the file of the Fast Track Judge (Magisterial Level), Karaikudi.) 1. For the sake of convenience, parties will be referred to as 'the complainant' and 'the accused'. 2. It is the case of the complainant that Sundarambal, wife of the accused is a member of Women Self Help Group in Kottaiyur, in which the complainant is also a member, on account of which the complainant and Sundarambal had close friendship. In view of this, the accused approached the complainant for a loan of Rs.4.50 lakhs on interest, for his family expenses, during the first week of January, 2015. Sundarambal also requested the complainant to give loan to the accused. 3. The complainant borrowed Rs.4.50 lakhs from her bother Devarajan and on 25.1.2015 gave the same to the accused in the presence of Sundaramb...
A. Haja Najmudin Vs. State Represented by The Superintendent of Police ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 18.02.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 18.02.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 18.02.2016, it is seen that the parties have entered into an agreement dated 10.02.2014 and thereafter, there appears to be breach of agreement. Since the dispute essentially appears to be civil in nature, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. 4. hence, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
Lakshman Raj and Another Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Pol ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records relating to FIR in Crime No.4 of 2015 dated 14.03.2015 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same as against the petitioners.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to call for the records relating to FIR in Crime No.4 of 2015 dated 14.03.2015 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same as against the petitioners. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.4 of 2015 for the alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 406 and 506(i) IPC and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act on the file of the 1st respondent police, has been registered against the petitioners/accused. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/Accused and the second respondent, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the Inspector ...
Ranganathan and Others Vs. The State Represented by Inspector of Polic ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 389(1) r/w Section 439 of Cr.P.C., to suspend the sentence of imprisonment passed in S.C.No.6 of 2014 dated 14.3.2016 by the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the Criminal Appeal.) A1 to A3 in the Sessions Case in S.C.No.6 of 2014 on the file of learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Coimbatore while challenging his conviction and sentence, seeks suspension of his sentence of imprisonment under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. 2. They were tried for a charge under Section 302 IPC. Ultimately, the learned Judge recorded conviction under Section 304(ii) IPC and sentenced each of them to two years R.I each and also directed each to pay a compensation of Rs.50,000/-, i/d 6 months S.I. 3. It started a drunken brawl but ended in the death of a person all because of a useless liquor bottle. Bottle gone to the dustbin. One man gone to grave yard. 4. The trial Court, considering that...
Union of India , rep by the Secretary, New Delhi and Others Vs. The Re ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the entire records of the first respondent in O.A.No.588 of 2011 including the order dated 21.04.2014 and to quash the same.) Huluvadi G.Ramesh, J. 1. The Union of India, representing the Southern Railways, being aggrieved by the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench dated 21.04.2014 in O.A.No.588 of 2011 is before this Court, seeking to quash the same. 2. The brief facts of the case runs as follows: (i) The second respondent, viz., M.Chitharanjan, while working as a Research Assistant in the Regional Soil Testing Laboratory, Cuddapah qualified in the Civil Service Examinations, 1989 for appointment in Class I/Group A Central Services and consequent to the same, he was appointed as a Probationer in the Indian Railways Accounts Service vide order dated 21.01.1991. Even though he was entitled to promotion to the post of Jun...
Pramilakumari Vs. State rep by The Inspector of Police, Chennai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment passed by the learned VI Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai in S.C.No.382 of 2007 dated 01.03.2013.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant the sole accused in S.C.No.382 of 2007 on the file of the learned VI Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai stood charged for offences under Section 3 r/w Section 25(1-B) and Section 5 r/w Section 27(1) of Arms Act and under Sections 302, 309 and 506(ii) I.P.C. By judgment dated 01.03.2013, the trial Court convicted her under all the charges and sentenced her to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C.; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months for the offence under Section 309 I.P.C.; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years for the offence under Section 506(ii) I.P.C.; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and pay a fin...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »