Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
B. Dilipkumar Vs. The Secretary to Government Department and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
V. Ramasubramanian, J. 1. The above writ petition was filed by a person belonging to the Scheduled Caste, who married a girl belonging to the upper caste, on account of which both of them were hounded and the girl eventually killed. The writ petition was disposed of by me, by a final order dated 11.11.2014, with certain directions. Paragraph 43 of the order which contains the operative portion, reads as follows: "43. In the light of the above, the writ petition is allowed to the following effect:- (1) The Superintendent of Police, Madurai and the 2nd respondent will hand over all the records relating to crime no. 308/14 on the file of Usilampatti Police Station as well as the materials collected by the present investigation officer namely the Dy.SP (PEW), Madurai forthwith to the 3rd respondent who will in turn nominate an officer not below the rank of a Superintendent of Police to continue the investigation and submit a final report to the Jurisdictional Magistrate . A further directi...
Easwari Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District and Anot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 16.03.2016 and investigate into the case and pass any such orders of this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in this circumstances of the case.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 16.03.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. It is seen that the petitioner has given the complaint dated 16.03.2016 to the Superintendent of Police / 1st respondent herein. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 16.03.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired int...
The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Pudhukott ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the judgment and decree dated 26.02.2007 made in M.C.O.P.No.473 of 2005 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Principal District Court, Pudukottai.) 1. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 26.02.2007 made in M.C.O.P.No.473 of 2005 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Principal District Court, Pudukottai. 2. The appellant / Transport Corporation is the respondent, the respondents 1 to 5 are the claimants. The claimants claimed a sum of Rs.27,00,000/- as compensation before the Tribunal for the death of one Jeyaraj @ Selvaraj in a road accident. 3. The facts of the case are as follows: - It is the case of the respondents / claimants before the Tribunal that on 20.03.2005 at about 1.10 p.m., when the deceased viz., Jeyaraja @ Selvaraj was riding his cycle, the bus belonging to the Transport Corporation came in the opposite...
N.K. Ramasamy Vs. The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Madra ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records from the first respondent's impugned proceedings order made in Na.Ka.No.867/2015 sa.pa. dated 24.02.2016 and quash the same as illegal and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Certiorari to call for the records from the first respondent's impugned proceedings order made in Na.Ka.No.867/2015 sa.pa. dated 24.02.2016 and quash the same as illegal. 2. Mr. N.S.Karthikeyan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The writ petition has been filed challenging a show-cause notice seeking for explanation after the proceedings initiated under Section 81 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act. 5. First of all, no writ will lie, because it is only a show-cause notice. Therefo...
M.S. Premkumar Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Trichy and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case as per the complaint of the petitioner dated 25/08/2015 and investigate the same in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case as per the complaint of the petitioner dated 25/08/2015 and investigate the same in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 25.08.2015, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 30.09.2015. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
K. Ramesh Vs. The Chairman, Airports Authority of India, New Delhi and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in AAI/MDU/AGME(C)/W-27/2009 dated 26.04.2012 on the file of the fifth respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to make the pending payment as per the communication dated 18.02.2011 by the respondent No.5, within a reasonable time stipulated by this Court as deem fit and proper. Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in AAI/MDU/AGME(C)/AGM/2013 dated 15.02.2013 on the file of the fifth respondent and quash the same as illegal within a reasonable time stipulated by this Court as deem fit and proper.) 1. When both these writ petitions are taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners stated that alr...
R. Balakrishnan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil and Anothe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent police to register an FIR on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 13.01.2016 and 03.02.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent police to register an FIR on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 13.01.2016 and 03.02.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint, it essentially appears to be a money dispute between the petitioner and the opposite party. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. 4. Therefore, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
Rajagopal Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent police to register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 29.2.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent police to register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 29.2.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 29.02.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 3rd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 29.02.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop action otherwise. With the above direction, this Criminal Original ...
Senthilkumar Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case against the proposed accused persons based on petitioner's complaint dated 07.03.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case against the proposed accused persons based on petitioner's complaint dated 07.03.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 07.03.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 03.04.2016. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
Kamaraj Vs. The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Genera ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records records of the 2nd respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.Oo.Mi.Pou/Na/Ki/Viru/Kou.Kattu/ A.No.158/16 dated 02.04.2016 and quash the same as illegal arbitrary violation of law and further direct the respondents 1 and 2 not to change the physical features of the electric poles in Ward No.18 T.S.No.487 to 493 493/1B 493/1C2 473/1C3 of Kathalambatti Virudhunagar Municipal Limit Virudhunagar District.) 1. The writ petition has been filed challenging the show-cause notice of the Department. 2. According to petitioner, he has filed a civil suit in O.S.No. 257 of 2005 before the District Munsif Court, Virudhunagar, for declaration to declare that the suit scheduled property is a public road. Earlier, he had obtained interim injunction. The interim order has already been vacated or not extended. Thereafter, no interim order obtain...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »