Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Veluchamy (Since Deceased) and Others Vs. Rajan (Since Deceased) and O ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order, dated 12.01.2016, made in I.A.No.338 of 2015 on the file of Principal District Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur, which was remanded by order dated 06.10.20105, made in M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 in A.S.(MD)No.72 of 2013 on the file of this Court, against O.S.No.154 of 2008 on the file of Principal District Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur.) Common Order 1. These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order, dated 12.01.2016, made in I.A.Nos.338 to 340 of 2015 on the file of Principal District Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur, which was remanded by order dated 06.10.20105, made in M.P.(MD)Nos.1, 1 and 1 of 2015 in A.S.(MD)Nos.72 to 74 of 2013 on the file of this Court, against O.S.Nos.154 of 2008, 8 of 2007 and 11 of 2009 on the file of Principal District Court, Virudhunagar D...
Vinothkumar Vs. The Inspector General of Police, Madurai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to register a case against the proposed accused persons on the basis of the petitioners complaint dated 17.3.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to register a case against the proposed accused persons on the basis of the petitioners complaint dated 17.3.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.177 of 2016. 3. In view of the above submission, the 3rd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall co-operate in the enquiry. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall take action in accordance with the la...
P. Sivaraman Vs. The Inspector of Police, Vadipatti Police Station, Ma ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.126 of 2013 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti and quash the same.) 1. This petition has been filedto call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.126 of 2013 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti and quash the same. 2. When this Court was not inclined to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.126 of 2013 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti on merits, learned counsel for the petitioner/accused seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 3. Permission is granted. This Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the presence of the petitioner, who is a practicing Advocate, before the Trial Court may be dispensed with. 5. Accepting the submission, this Court directs the ...
Ranjith @ Ranjithkumar Vs. The State rep by Inspector of Police M3, Pu ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the sentence and conviction made in judgment in S.C.No.105/2012 dated 25.06.2013 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Thiruvallur.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.105 of 2012 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur. He stood charged for offence under Section 302 IPC. By judgment dated 25.06.2013, the trial Court convicted him under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the accused/appellant is before this Court with this appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows: [a] The deceased in this case was one Mrs.Selvi. The accused is her husband. The marriage between the accused and the deceased was celebrated approximately seven years prior to the date of occurrence. They had two children, by...
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
M. Venugopal, J. 1. Heard the Learned counsel for the Petitioner. 2. The Petitioner/Accused has preferred the instant Criminal Revision Petition before this Court as against the judgment dated 08.02.2016 in Crl.A.No.54 of 2013 passed by the Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hosur, Krishnagiri, confirming the judgment dated 19.11.2013 in S.T.C.No.146 of 2012 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Hosur, Krishnagiri, sentencing him to undergo 6 months Simple Imprisonment under Section 138 of N.I. Act, 1882 and directing him to pay a compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- within a period of one month in terms of Section 357 of Cr.P.C. 3. The Petitioner/Accused has preferred the instant Criminal Revision Petition being aggrieved against the judgment dated 8.02.2016 in Crl.A.No.54 of 2013 passed by the Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hosur, Krishnagiri primarily contending that the conviction imposed by the trial Court as well as the Appellate Cour...
P. Murugesan Vs. The State represented by Inspector of Police Kamanaik ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 [2] of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the Judgment dated 18.12.2012 passed in S.C.No.296 of 2011 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur.) P. Kalaiyarasan, J. This Criminal Appeal is against the Judgment, dated 18.12.2012 made in S.C.No.296 of 2011 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur. 2. The appellant is the first accused in the case. The second accused died. The appellant / accused has been convicted for the offence under Sections 341 and 302 r/w 34 IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and also to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC and to undergo one month Simple Imprisonment for the offence under Section 341 IPC. The sentences were ordered to run concurrently. 3. The short facts leading to the filing of the appeal are as follows : [a] The deceased Mayilsamy, ...
K.A.V.S. Veluchamy (Died) and Others Vs. Radhalakshmi and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer in both the C.R.Ps.:-Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order dated 22.01.2016, made in I.A.No.652 of 2014 in I.A.No.140 of 2011 in O.S.No.71 of 2011, on the file of Subordinate Court, Srivilliputhur.) Common Order 1. These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order dated 22.01.2016, made in I.A.No.652 of 2014 in I.A.No.140 of 2011 in O.S.No.71 of 2011, on the file of Subordinate Court, Srivilliputhur. 2. Since common issues are involved in both the civil revision petitions, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order. 3. The petitioners are the respondents 3 and 4 in I.A.No.652 of 2014 filed by the first respondent herein - Radhalakshmi. The second respondent - V.Vignesh filed O.S.No.71 of 2011 against one K.A.V.S.Velusamy, for recovery of Rs.1,10,000/-. He filed I.A.No.140 of 2011 for attachment of propert...
P. Deepan Chakravarthy Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni and Ano ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent herein to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 14.3.2016 investigate into the case in accordance with law and file final report within a reasonable time.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the the 2nd respondent herein to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 14.3.2016 investigate into the case in accordance with law and file final report. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the complaint, given by the petitioner, a case has already been registered in Crime No.269 of 2016 on 29.03.2016 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 294(b), 506(ii) and 379. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court is of the view that nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, the Cr...
K. Balamurugan Ambalam Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent herein to register the complaint given by the Petitioner dated 05.03.2016 and take necessary action and file a final report before the concerned court within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court and pass such other orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent herein to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 05.03.2016 and take necessary action and file a final report before the concerned court 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending. 3. In view of the above submission, the 2nd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of rece...
M. Zahir Ushen Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Karur and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 29.02.2016 and take necessary action within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 29.02.2016 and take necessary action within the time stipulated by this Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 29.02.2016, it essentially appears to be a partnership dispute between the petitioner and the opposite party in as much as both were running a business from 2002 onwards and now, it is alleged by the petitioner that the opposite party has not rendered profit amounts. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. 4. Accordingly, this petition is closed with l...