Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Johnshi Manuel Vs. J.C. Sampath Kumar and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order dated 23.03.2015 passed in I.A.No.8847/2013 in O.S.No.3452 of 2013 on the file of the learned XIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.) 1. The arguments advanced on behalf of the parties are heard. O.S.No.3452/2013 on the file of the XIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai came to be filed by J.C.Sampath Kumar and S.Christopher, the respondents 1 and 2 herein for various reliefs of declaration and injunction, including a declaration that the mandate dated 20.10.2012 issued by the third respondent herein (first defendant) from the CSI Synod Secretariat at Chennai to defendant No.9 in the said suit was in contravention of the procedures laid down by the CSI Constitution and hence the same was illegal, unconstitutional and void ab initio. 2. The said suit came to be filed by the respondents 1 and 2 herein in their individual capacities, but as persons r...
Selvaraj and Others Vs. State by The Inspector of Police Vellore South ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the Judgment passed in S.C.No.308 of 2010, dated 18.03.2013, by the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore.) P. Kalaiyarasan, J. This criminal appeal is against the Judgment, dated 18.03.2013 made in S.C.No.308 of 2010 on the file of the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore. 2. The appellants are accused 1 to 4 in the Sessions case. The prosecution arrayed 6 accused in the case before the Sessions Court. The case against the 6th accused was split up as S.C.No.56 of 2011. Therefore, A1 to A5 faced trial. The Trial Court framed as many as five charges as detailed below. ad>ChargeAccusedPenal Provisions11 to 5120-B IPC21 to 5148 IPC31 to 5302 IPC41307 IPC (3 counts)52307 IPC (5 counts)63307 IPC (4 counts)74307 IPC (2 counts)85307 IPC (2 counts)91 to 5307 r/w 149 IPC 3. By Judgment, dated 18.03.2013, the Trial Court while acquitting A5, convicted and sentenced A1 to A...
M. Sulfath Beevi and Others Vs. Sara Banu and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer in both Transfer CMPs: The Transfer CMPs are filed to withdraw the Appeals in A.S.Nos.26 and 27 of 2005 on the file of I Additional District Court, Thirunelveli and transfer the same to the file of High Court, Madurai.) 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these petitions and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed....
Vanitha Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 11.01.2016 and initiate necessary action in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the the 2nd respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 11.01.2016 and initiate necessary action in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint, earlier given by the petitioner for the same set of facts was enquired into and was closed on 11.01.2016. A copy of the closure report is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy in the manner known to law....
State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Secretary to Government, Commercial Ta ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
M. Venugopal, J. 1. To avoid an avoidable delay, notice to the respondent is dispensed with. 2. The Appellants/Respondents have preferred the present intra Court Writ Appeal as against the order dated 27.08.2015 in W.P.No.14707 of 2015 passed by the learned single Judge. 3. The learned single Judge, while passing the impugned order in W.P.No.14707 of 2015 (filed by the Respondent/Writ Petitioner on 27.08.2015) at paragraphs 6 to 9, had observed the following and consequently disposed of the writ petition: "6.This Court has considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for both sides and perused the materials available on record. 7. A perusal of the order impugned order would go to show that there is no indication that the petitioner has been heard. Admittedly, the impugned order has got civil consequences too. 8. In such view of the matter, the impugned order, dated 06.03.2015, is set aside. Consequently, the second respondent is directed to issue notice to the petitioner, as ...
K. Balasubramanian Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Karur
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the petitioner complaint dated 14.03.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the petitioner complaint dated 14.03.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 14.03.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
G. Tamilarasi Vs. Government of India, Rep. By the Secretary, New Delh ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: W.P.No.19049 of 2015: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the order bearing Ref.No. IMU/CC/01/STAFF/EST/2015, dated 19.06.2015 passed by the third respondent and to quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary and contrary to their letter dated 18.12.2014 and for a consequential mandamus to permit the petitioner to retain the staff quarters No.5 on payment of market rent as per letter dated 18.12.2014. W.P.No.19050 of 2015: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of mandamus to direct the second respondent University to consider and give compassionate appointment to the petitioner's son in terms of the Award dated 10.10.2014 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal in I.D.No.01 of 2014 and Central Government Rules.) 1. The petitioner has filed two writ petitions (i) to retain the quarters given by the second respo...
Pandian Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner herein dated 26.2.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner herein dated 26.2.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 26.02.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 3rd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 26.02.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with l...
Ilangovan Vs. Ramasamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedue to set aside the order and decreetal order dated 02.08.2010 made in I.A.No.280 of 2010 in I.A.No.1165 of 2002 in O.S.No.187 of 1997 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Villupuram.) This Civil Revision Petition is filed to set aside the order and the decreetal order dated 02.08.2010 in I.A.No.280 of 2010 in I.A.No.1165 of 2002 in O.S.No.187 of 1997 passed by the Additional District Munsif Court, Villupuram. 2. A suit in O.S.No.187 of 1997 was filed by the respondent herein, before the learned Additional District Munsif Court, Villupuram for partition and separate possession, in respect of one-third share in the suit properties. The learned Additional District Munsif, Villupuram, dismissed the suit with costs on 27.08.1999 and aggrieved against the said order, the plaintiff/respondent herein filed an appeal in A.S.No.172 of 1999 before the First Additional Sub-Court, Villupuram. The...
Murugesan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent police to register the case on the basis of petitioner's complaint dated 3.3.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent police to register the case on the basis of petitioner's complaint dated 3.3.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the complaint, given by one Sudhakar, who is none other than the son of the petitioner, a case has already been registered in Crime No.81 of 2016 on 12.04.2016 for offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court is of the view that nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is closed....
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »