Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A. Vairaprakasam Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 12.03.2016 on the file of the respondent police.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 12.03.2016 on the file of the respondent police. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that the complaint dated 12.03.2016 has been sent by post to the official respondents. 3. It is seen that the dispute essentially appears to be between the employee and the erstwhile employer for breach of service contract. Since the petitioner has sent the complaint by post, he is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 12.03.2016. On receipt of such...
K. Manicka Nadar Vs. State Represented by The Deputy Superintendent of ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 1.3.2016 and investigate the matter in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 1.3.2016 and investigate the matter in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.54 of 2016. 3. It is alleged by the petitioner that the opposite parties are causing harassment and disturbance to the petitioner. 4. The respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to cooperate in the enquiry. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made ou...
Palsamy Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai and others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to register a case against the proposed accused persons based on the petitioner's complaint dated 22.3.2016) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to register a case against the proposed accused persons based on the petitioner's complaint dated 22.3.2016 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.18 of 2016. 3. In view of the above submission, the respondent police is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to cooperate in the enquiry. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law lai...
S. Chinnaiah Vs. The General Manager, National Textile Corporation Ltd ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the first respondent through his proceeding Ref: PION/Cotton-LoadMan/ 2015-12 dated 24.12.2015 and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to allow the petitioner to perform the loading and unloading work till 31.03.2017 as per the proceeding of the first respondent in Cotton Loading/450/2014 dated 12.05.2014 and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 24.12.2015 for cancellation of contract. 2. According to the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner is a Contractor and he was awarded with the contract, but it has been cancelled without even a prior notice. Since the respondent is a Government undertaking, the writ petition would be maintainable. 3. Even at the time of numbering the...
Chinnathambi @ Karuppusamy and Others Vs. The State by the Inspector o ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Appeals filed under section 374 Cr.P.C., against the conviction and sentence passed in SC.No.180/2009 dated 26.09.2012 by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur.) Common Judgment S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant in Crl.A.No.131/2013 is arrayed as A3 and the appellant in Crl.A.No.172/2013 is arrayed as A2 and the appellant in Crl.A.No.330/2013 is arrayed as A1 in SC.No.180/2009 on the file of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore at Tiruppur. Vide judgment dated 26.09.2012, they have been convicted and sentenced as follows:- ad>Rank of the AccusedConviction under sectionSentence awardedA1341 IPCSentenced to undergo one month simple imprisonment.302 IPCSentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1500/-, in default, to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment.A2341 IPCSentenced to undergo one month simple imprisonment.302 r/w 109 r/w 34 IPCSentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of R...
G. Justus Abraham Devasagayam Vs. The Joint Director of School Educati ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to grant full salary for the period 27.12.2008 to 06.07.2011 and regularize the petitioner service on par with his junior with all consequential benefits by considering the representation dated 09.12.2015 within a stipulated time.) T. Raja, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition, through letter dated 12.04.2016 to the Registry. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....
Pichaiappan and Others Vs. R. Padmanabhan and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the judgment and award dated 30.07.2014 passed by the learned I Additional District Judge [Motor Accident Claims Tribunal], Tindivanam in MCOP No.167 of 2013.) Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J. The claimants are the appellants, who are before this Court, challenging the award dated 30.07.2014 passed by the learned I Additional District Judge [Motor Accident Claims Tribunal], Tindivanam in MCOP No.167 of 2013, seeking enhancement of compensation. 2. The brief facts of the case is as follows: (i) This is a case of fatal accident. (ii) On 18.03.2012 at about 13.30 hours, when the deceased was riding his motor cycle bearing Regn.No.PY-01-AY-0119 in Tindivanam-Gingee Road, a lorry bearing Regn.No.TN-05-Z-2428, insured with the second respondent-Insurance company, came in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the deceased due to which the deceased fell down and who suffered multiple injuries and died on the spot. The claimants/appellants, who are the...
Jeyam Vs. Jeya Seela
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 20.08.2013, made in A.S.No.2 of 2011 on the file of Sub Court, Vallioor, confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2010, made in O.S.No.155 of 2007, on the file of learned Principal District Munsif, Nanguneri.) 1. This is an appeal preferred by the defendant in O.S.No.155 of 2007, challenging the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2010 on the file of learned Principal District Munsif, Nanguneri, as confirmed by the judgment and decree dated 20.08.2013, in A.S.No.2 of 2011 on the file of Sub Court, Vallioor. 2. The respondent, as plaintiff, filed the suit in O.S.No.155 of 2007 before the trial Court for a decree of declaration that the suit properties belonged to her, besides a decree of injunction. 3. In the plaint in O.S.No.155 of 2007, it is the case of the respondent as plaintiff that the suit properties originally belonged to one Gurusamy Nadar. He had three fema...
P. Chinthamani Vinayakam Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent herein to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 15.03.2016 and take necessary actin within the time stipulated by this Honble Court and pass such other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent herein to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 15.03.2016 and take necessary action. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 15.03.2016, it essentially appears to be a money dispute between the petitioner and the opposite party and in order to give a criminal colour to it, the petitioner has stated that he was intimidated. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. Hence,...
Noorul Aynaammal Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur and Anoth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respndents to register the case on the basis of the complaint dated 02.01.2016 given by the petitioner and to investigate the same in the manner known to law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respndents to register the case on the basis of the complaint dated 02.01.2016 given by the petitioner and to investigate the same in the manner known to law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.84 of 2016. 3. In view of the above submission, the 2nd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to cooperate in the enquiry. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, t...