Rathinakumar Vs. The Deputy Chairman and Estate Officer, V.O. Chidambaranar Port Trust, Engineering Department (Civil),Tuticorin

Rathinakumar vs The Deputy Chairman and Estate Officer, V.O. Chidambaranar Port Trust, Engineering Department (Civil),Tuticorin

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 13, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191469

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1191469
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: B. Rajendran
Decided On: Apr 13, 2016
Case Number: W.P(MD)No. 7228 of 2016 & WMP(MD)No. 6125 of 2016
Subject: Arbitration

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Arbitration

Key legal issue: Arbitration

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rathinakumar

Respondent

The Deputy Chairman and Estate Officer, V.O. Chidambaranar Port Trust, Engineering Department (Civil),Tuticorin

Excerpt

(prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying this court to issue a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the order of terminating the allotment order issued by the respondent in his proceedings in e(c)/f37/06/2013/estate/d.200 dated 05.04.2016 and pass further orders as this court may deem fit and proper.) 1. the prayer in the writ petition is for a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the order of terminating the allotment order issued by the respondent in his proceedings in e(c)/f37/06/2013/estate/d.200 dated 05.04.2016. 2. this matter is purely contractual in nature. a contract has been cancelled on the policy decision taken in order to maintain law and order in and around the beach area of zone-a. the respondent has also given time upto 01.05.2016. therefore, this court cannot interfere with the contractual matter. 3. it is also brought to the notice of this court that there is an arbitration clause. whatever be the grievance of the petitioner, the petitioner can raise all his grievance before the arbitration. 4. therefore, this writ petition is dismissed. no costs. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the order of terminating the allotment order issued by the respondent in his proceedings in E(C)/F37/06/2013/Estate/D.200 dated 05.04.2016 and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.)

1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the order of terminating the allotment order issued by the respondent in his proceedings in E(C)/F37/06/2013/Estate/D.200 dated 05.04.2016.

2. This matter is purely contractual in nature. A contract has been cancelled on the policy decision taken in order to maintain law and order in and around the beach area of Zone-A. The respondent has also given time upto 01.05.2016. Therefore, this Court cannot interfere with the contractual matter.

3. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that there is an arbitration clause. Whatever be the grievance of the petitioner, the petitioner can raise all his grievance before the Arbitration.

4. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Rathinakumar vs The Deputy Chairman and Estate Officer, V.O. ... Same Subject Arbitration Same Judge B. Rajendran