Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R. Nandagopal Vs. The Inspector of Police CBI/ACB/Chennai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397(1) read with Sec. 401 of Cr.P.C against the order dated 20.01.2016 passed by the learned II Additional and Sessions Judge, Chennai in Crl.M.P.No.6414 of 2015 in C.A.No.43 of 2014.) The sole accused in C.C.No.4805 of 2010 on the file of the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai aggrieved by the order passed by the appellate court dated 20.01.2016 in Crl.M.P.No.6414 of 2015 in Crl.A.No.43 of 2014 allowing the reception petition filed by the prosecution under Section 391 Cr.P.C., has directed this revision. 2. The petitioner was appointed as a Constable in CBI. Claiming to be a member of 'Kattunaicken Community' a Scheduled Tribe, he produced a community certificate. Based on the allegation that the said Certificate is false, he was prosecuted in C.C.No.4805 of 2010 for an offence under Section 420 IPC and certain other offences. The learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate convicted and sentenced him. 3. ...
Kali Vs. The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-01-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside the order dated 17.12.2015 in Cr.M.P.No.7149 of 2015 in S.C.No. 134 of 2015 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli Tirunelveli District.) 1. This petitioner has been filed to set aside the order dated 17.12.2015 in Cr.M.P.No.7149 of 2015 in S.C.No.134 of 2015 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli Tirunelveli District. 2. The petitioner is facing prosecution in S.C.No.134 of 2015 before the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli for offences under Sections 294(b) and 302 IPC. During the course of trial, the prosecution filed a petition in Cr.M.P.No.7149 of 2105 in S.C.No.134 of 2015 under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for examining Dr.Radhna Pethmurugan and Dr.Nirmalkumar as additional witnesses. The accused strongly objected to the examination by filing a counter. The Trial Court considered the rival submissions and allowed the petition on 17.12.2015, challenging which...
Kanniammal and Others Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Tran ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the award and decree dated 31.07.2014 passed in M.C.O.P.No.551 of 2013, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (IV Small Causes Court), Chennai.) Common Judgment: R. Sudhakar, J. 1. While the appellant/Transport Corporation has filed the appeal in C.M.A.No.2651 of 2015, the appellants / claimants have filed the appeal in C.M.A.No.1143 of 2015 challenging the Award dated 31.07.2014 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (IV Small Causes Court,) Chennai, made in M.C.O.P.No.551 of 2013. 2. It is a case of fatal accident. On 09.05.2012, at about 10.30 p.m., while the deceased, a pedestrian was walking towards Chengalpattu direction opposite to Samiyar Gate, Peramanur Maraimalai Nagar, the bus belonging to the appellant/Transport Corporation, bearing registration No.TN-68-N-0200, driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner came in the opposite direction and dashed ...
Muthumurugan Vs. The District Collector, Virudhunagar District and Ano ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-01-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to lease out the fishery right to the petitioner for the Fasli year 1425 of Podipithan Kanmai situated in Singammalpuram Village, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District, considering the petitioner's deposit amount of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) for the Fasli 1454 and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petitionis for a Writ of Mandamus to directing the second respondent to lease out the fishery right to the petitioner for the Fasli year 1425 of Podipithan Kanmai situated in Singammalpuram Village, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District, considering the petitioner's deposit amount of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) for the Fasli 1454. 2. Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.M.Raja Rajan, takes ...
A. Sajitha Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai District and O ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the first respondent proceeding in Pa.Mu.Pe.4/1261/2014 dated 24.07.2014 and quash the same and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the first respondent proceeding in Pa.Mu.Pe.4/1261/2014 dated 24.07.2014 and quash the same. 2. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 3. The impugned order is liable to be set aside only on the ground of violation of Principles of natural justice, as notice for enquiry on 22.07.2014 was only served on him on 22.07.2014, as per the postal cover produced by the petitioner. Definitely, he could not have appeared on the same day. 4. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remitted back...