Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Murugaiah Vs. State Represented by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Tirune ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 07.01.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 07.01.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.30 of 2016. 3. In view of the above submission, the respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to cooperate in the enquiry. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of...
Ranjitham Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District and An ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 18.01.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 18.01.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 18.01.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 09.02.2016. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
S. Ramanathan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 13.2.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 13.2.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 13.02.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 08.04.2016. A copy of the Closure Report is filed before this Court. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with direction to the respondent police to send a copy of the closure report to the petitioner within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if not already sent....
Saisiva @ Sivasubramanian Vs. The Joint Commissioner, The Hindu Religi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the impugned order in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.825/2016/A1 dated 06.02.2016 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Certiorari to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the impugned order in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.825/2016/A1 dated 06.02.2016 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. 2. Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.Muthugeethian, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.AK.Baskara Pandian, appearing for the second respondent. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The writ petition has been filed as against the impugned order dated 06.02.2016. The petitioner though questione...
S. Suresh @ Suresh Kumar Vs. M/s. Scope International Pvt. Ltd., Chenn ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 10.07.2014 made in MACT O.P.No.1878 of 2013 on the file of II Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Court of Small Causes), Chennai.) Common Judgment: Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J. 1. The injured claimant has filed this appeal seeking enhancement of the compensation made in M.C.O.P.No.1878 of 2013, dated 10.07.2014 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, II Small Causes Court, Chennai. 2. Heard the learned counsel representing the claimant and the learned counsel representing the 2nd respondent-Insurance Company. 3. It is a case of injury. On 06.03.2013 at about 09.00 hours, while the claimant was riding the Motor Cycle bearing Reg.No.TN-22-CC-4285 from south to north in G.S.T.Road, Pallavaram Over Bridge, the first respondent's car bearing Reg.No.TN-01-AT-0343, driven in a rash and negligent manner, came from behind and hit the claimant, due to which, he fel...
M.V. Swaminathan Vs. The State Represented by Inspector of Police SPE: ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C., to suspend the sentence of imprisonment passed in C.C.No.32 of 2009 dated 6.4.2016 by the learned Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, Chennai and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the Criminal Appeal.) 1. A1, a public servant, who has been prosecuted before the learned XIV Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Chennai while canvassing the correctness of conviction and sentence, seeks suspension of sentence of his imprisonment. 2. A1, who was an appraiser at the Customs Department at the relevant time is alleged to have amassed wealth disproportionate to his known source of income during the check period. 3. Ultimately, after trial, he was convicted and sentenced as under: ad>AccusedConvictionSentence A1Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(e) of P.C. Act, 1988One year R.I and fine Rs.40,000/-, i/d 2 months R.I 4. He has paid the fine amount. The trial Court also suspended the sentence to enable the appellant to get appeal...
Muthu Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep by its Secretary to Government ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus calling for the entire records leading to the detention of the petitioner's son Siva @ Sivakumar @ Podi Siva male aged about 28 years is presently lodged in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, and has been detained under Act 14/82 as a Goonda vide detention order dated 31.10.2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein made in Memo No.1149/BCDFGISSSV/2015 quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to produce the body and person of the said detenu before this Court and thereafter set him at liberty from the Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.) M. Jaichandren, J. 1. The petitioner, who is the mother of the detenu herein, namely, Siva @ Sivakumar @ Podi Siva, son of Karunakaran, aged 28 years, has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 31.10.2015 against her son branding him as a "Goonda" under the ...
VVA. Salahuddeen Aalim Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its P ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, seeking to set aside the order dated 15.10.2014 made in W.P.(MD) No.16854 of 2014.) V. Ramasubramanian, J. 1. This Appeal arises out of the dismissal of a writ petition filed by the appellant, challenging the appointment of the 4th respondent herein as Kazi for the District of Ramanathapuram. 2. We have heard Mr.M.Ajmalkhan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant, Mr.M.Alaguthevan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.K.Govindarajan, learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent. 3. The appellant herein was appointed as Kazi for the entire District of Ramanathapuram. The appointment of Kazi was made by the State Government, in exercise of the power conferred by Section 2 of The Kazis Act, 1880. 4. Though Section 2 of the said Act empowers the State Government to appoint one or more Kazis for any local area, the appointment should be made after consulting the Principal ...
Vijayaraman @ Vijayadoss Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 09.03.2016 and consequently directing the 2nd respondent to investigate and to file a final report within a stipulated time as fixed by this Honble Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 09.03.2016, investigate and to file a final report. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 09.03.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 26.03.2016. A copy of the Closure Report has been furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner ...
K. Annapoorani Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai and Anoth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 18.01.2016 and investigate the same.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 18.01.2016 and investigate the same. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaints dated 18.01.2016 and 15.02.2016 have been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 15.02.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop action other...
- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »