.....21, 2004. consequently, according to the petitioner, no notice of hearing could be served on the petitioner as the petitioner was in hospital. the factum of hospitalisation is pleaded at paragraph 11 of the writ petition and at paragraph 6 of the supplementary affidavit. at paragraph 11 of the writ petition, the petitioner claims to have annexed the discharge certificates for the aforesaid periods of hospitalisation. two discharge certificates have been annexed to the writ petition. in fact, these are the only discharge certificates in the entirety of the pleadings and the records available to court. the discharge certificate at page 38 of the writ petition relates to the period from january 27, 2003 to may 6, 2003. the other discharge certificate at page 46 of the writ petition relates to the period from june 8, 2004 to december 21, 2004. the dates of hearing are for the period from november 11, 2003 to november 19, 2004. the petitioner has not produced any documents to substantiate paragraph 11 of the writ petition or paragraph 6 of the supplementary affidavit. the petitioner has not been able to substantiate that he was hospitalised for the period january 27, 2003 to june 4,.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....(c) prohibit, from a date fixed as aforesaid, the quarrying of stone, or the burning of lime or charcoal, or the collection or subjection to any manufacturing process, or removal of, any forest-produce in any such forest, and the breaking up or clearing for cultivation, for building, for herding cattle or for any other purpose, of any land in any such forest". -3- perusal of section 29 of the indian forest act suggests that any portion of the forest area not included in a reserved forest and by which the government has proprietary right can be declared to be protected forest by virtue of a notification. sub section (a) of section 30 gives the power to the state government to declare any tress or class of trees in a protected forest to be reserved from a date fixed by the notification. sub section (b) of section 30 gives power to the state government to declare any portion of such forest specified in the notification shall be closed for such term not exceeding thirty years and the rights under such portion shall be suspended during such terms provided that the remainder of such forest be sufficient and in a locality reasonably convenient, for the due exercise of the right.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....he does not wish to press the revision application. in the circumstances, cr. revision no.59 of 2006 stands dismissed as not pressed. 3 4. the fact, emerging from fardbeyan of mohan mahto, recorded on 18th june, 2003, at 11:00 hours, at mauja gondalbari within sarwan police station, district deoghar, is that on 18th june, 2003 at about 4:30 a.m., govind mahto (deceased), mohan mahto (informant) and hargouri mahto (brother-in-law of the deceased) proceeded on their bicycles to attend court at deoghar in connection with a case prevailing between bilkhi rautain and rameshwar raut and others. when they reached near gondalbari culvert at about 4:35 a.m. the appellants and their associates, who are named in the first information report, suddenly appeared from their hideout and intercepted govind mahto, who was proceeding ahead, whereas the informant and hargouri mahto were cycling behind. it is alleged that rameshwar raut instigated companion accused to kill them. thereafter, the appellants, who were armed with bhujali, tangi, farsa, dagger etc., started inflicting blows by means of their respective weapons to govind mahto. after having first assault on his neck, govind mahto.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....to the court in the proviso to s.9 is that the court shall not proceed to admit to consideration an appeal which is not accompanied by satisfactory proof of the payment of the admitted tax. this will be when the case is taken up by the court for the first time.”. mr. jishnu chowdhury, learned advocate, cited snehadeep structures private limited vs. maharashtra small-scale industries development corporation limited reported in ( 2010) 3 scc, 34 where the hon’ble supreme court was considering section 7 of the interest on delayed payments to small scale and ancillary industrial undertakings act, 1993, which has been repealed and re- enacted by the 2006 act. a judgement is a precedent for the issue of law which is raised and decided. in snehadeep structures (supra), the hon’ble supreme court found that the legislation and the contextual meaning of the term ‘appeal’ would include an application under section 34 as well. it is true that the hon’ble supreme court made a passing observation that “this provision (sic section 19 of the 2006 act ) no doubt, requires the deposit to be made before an application under section 34 of the arbitration act is filed. however,.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....of the magistrate issuing summons against the respondent no.4 (original accused no.2), but the said accused has not approached this court.3. the facts, briefly stated, are that m/s abg shipyard ltd. is a company registered under the companies act, 1956. on being approached by the authorities of the company, a short term loan facility for a sum of rs. 200 crores was granted by the appellant-bank to the company on 28.04.2012. as averred in the complaint, the company executed an indemnity in favour of the appellant-bank and agreed to repay the amount in three instalments; one on 15.12.2012, the second on 15.01.2013 and the last on 15.02.2013. the company issued three cheques, one dated 15.12.2012 for rs.66,67,00,000/-, and the two others dated 15.01.2013 and 15.02.2013 for rs.66,67,00,000/- and rs.66,66,00,000/- respectively towards the repayment of the liability. as per the dates mentioned in the cheques, they were presented before the bank but due to “insufficient funds” and “account blocked” the cheques were dishonoured. the appellant-bank issued requisite statutory notice for each cheque. as no response was given by the respondents, the appellant filed three.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....for life under section 302/34 and 120b of the ipc and further sentenced to undergo r.i. for five years for the offence u/s 27 arms act. 2 2. the fact emerges from the fard-beyan of arun kumar (deceased), recorded on 16.8.2003 at 21:30 hrs. at sadar hospital, sahibganj is that on 16.8.2003 at about 9 p.m. the informant returned home along with his brother anant kumar from his shop on motorcycle. no sooner the informant was going to change his dress, appellant kanchan sinha called him and told that forget the previous incidents which had taken place and accompany him for smoking. the informant then proceeded along with appellant kanchan sinha. it is alleged that after covering some distance when they reached near the garage of israil, the informant noticed presence of five to six persons and out of them identified the appellants bablu yadav and babloo rajak. it is further alleged that appellants and their associates who were present near the garage, started dragging the informant to nearby alley approaching to priya hotel. it is further alleged that bablu yadav of talbanna opened fire causing injury to the informant on his abdomen and after sustaining injury he fell down......
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....for life under section 302/34 and 120b of the ipc and further sentenced to undergo r.i. for five years for the offence u/s 27 arms act. 2 2. the fact emerges from the fard-beyan of arun kumar (deceased), recorded on 16.8.2003 at 21:30 hrs. at sadar hospital, sahibganj is that on 16.8.2003 at about 9 p.m. the informant returned home along with his brother anant kumar from his shop on motorcycle. no sooner the informant was going to change his dress, appellant kanchan sinha called him and told that forget the previous incidents which had taken place and accompany him for smoking. the informant then proceeded along with appellant kanchan sinha. it is alleged that after covering some distance when they reached near the garage of israil, the informant noticed presence of five to six persons and out of them identified the appellants bablu yadav and babloo rajak. it is further alleged that appellants and their associates who were present near the garage, started dragging the informant to nearby alley approaching to priya hotel. it is further alleged that bablu yadav of talbanna opened fire causing injury to the informant on his abdomen and after sustaining injury he fell down......
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....on the premise of benefit of doubt and when the disciplinary authority had exercised the powers as per the regulations, taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner was not entitled for any further benefits. it is submitted that ext.p2 order on the revision was again sought to be reviewed by filing ext.p4. the review petition has no legal sanctity and therefore no provision under the regulations enables the chairman to consider the review petition. it is therefore held that the petitioner cannot have any right by virtue of filing a review petition. 4. learned single judge, after considering the matter, observed that when petitioner had filed ext.p4 review petition addressed to the 3rd respondent/chairman of the corporation, who is the appellate authority in terms of regulation 40, ought to have transmitted it to the authority competent to entertain such a review filed in terms of regulation 48. therefore, the learned single judge, after having elaborately considered the matter, disposed of the writ petition directing ext.p4 to be considered in accordance with regulation 48. 5. while impugning the aforesaid judgment, the learned counsel for the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....ext.p15 in w.p.c.no.23638/2009. for easy reference, the documents as exhibited in w.p.c.no.23638/2009 are referred, unless otherwise stated. 2. the facts involved in these writ petitions would disclose that the petitioners retired from the service of kerala live stock development board on different dates. they were initially recruited as inseminators in the indo-swiss project (isp) under the animal husbandry department during 1971-72 on contract basis. later the isp was merged with the kerala live stock development and milk marketing board (kld and mm board). the petitioners, along with several others, were regularised in service in the kld and mm board with effect from 03/04/1978. they were deputed to undergo live stock assistants training course conducted by the kerala agricultural university. they successfully completed the training and were appointed as live stock assistants as per order dated 01/04/1984. thereafter, the kld and mm board was reconstituted as the kerala live stock development board ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the board'). in the meantime, certain original petitions were filed before this court by certain persons who were working on contract basis in the.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT.....single judge allowed the original petition filed by the petitioners. aggrieved by the said judgment, the state has come up in appeal. 2. brief facts of the case necessary for deciding the appeal are: both the petitioners entered in service as trainee police constables in armed police bettalionon 01.08.1974. after training they were regularly appointed as police constables with effect from 01.06.1975. they were promoted as hawildar on 20.04.1981. on their willingness they were reverted as police constables and transferred to district armed reserve on 07.06.1982 where they were promoted as head constables on 08.06.1982. on their written request petitioners were transferred to local police. they joined local police on 18.12.1991. from 18.12.1991 they were working as police constables but due to administrative delay, their pay was not regularized immediately and their pay was regularised on 31.10.1993 and certain excess amounts from 18.12.1991 to 31.12.1993 was recovered. petitioners were granted 20 years higher grade from 01.06.1995 in the scale ofassistant sub inspector. the 1st petitioner submitted a representation on 05.06.1996 praying that he may be granted 10 years and 20.....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT