Jeeva Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Police (LandO), Madurai and Another

Jeeva vs The Deputy Commissioner of Police (LandO), Madurai and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 15, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191381

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1191381
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: P.N. Prakash
Decided On: Apr 15, 2016
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD)No. 5578 of 2016
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jeeva

Respondent

The Deputy Commissioner of Police (LandO), Madurai and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case against the accused on the complaint dated 06.02.2016.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case against the accused on the complaint dated 06.02.2016. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the state. 3. on reading of the complaint dated 06.02.2016, the dispute essentially appears to be civil in nature in as much as the opposite party had borrowed rs.10 lakhks and executed a mortgage deed, which was registered as doc.no.611 of 2013. now, it is alleged by the petitioner that the mortgage property is ancestral property and there are encumbrances. 4. in a case of this nature, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an fir. hence, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2^nd respondent to register a case against the accused on the complaint dated 06.02.2016.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2^nd respondent to register a case against the accused on the complaint dated 06.02.2016.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State.

3. On reading of the complaint dated 06.02.2016, the dispute essentially appears to be civil in nature in as much as the opposite party had borrowed Rs.10 lakhks and executed a mortgage deed, which was registered as Doc.No.611 of 2013. Now, it is alleged by the petitioner that the mortgage property is ancestral property and there are encumbrances.

4. In a case of this nature, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. Hence, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Jeeva vs The Deputy Commissioner of Police (LandO), Madurai a... Same Subject Education Same Judge P.N. Prakash