Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
1. Case diary of Crime No.869 of 2010 registered at Police Station Khurai, District Sagar for offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 506(2) and 304-B of I.P.C is perused. The applicants have an apprehension of their arrest in relation to the aforesaid crime.2. History of the case in short is that a criminal trial was filed by the Police Station Khurai against the applicants for offence punishable under Sections 498-A , 323, 506(2) of I.P.C on 30.12.2008. On 11.1.2009 the complainant died at her parents house.3. Then an application under Section 216 of Cr.P.C was made before the trial Court to modify the charges and learned JMFC Khurai in Criminal Case No.1654/2008 vide order dated 14.6.2010 took the cognizance of offence punishable under Section 304-B of I.P.C and issued the arrest warrants against the applicants.4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that initially case was filed for offence under Section 498-A of I.P.C and the complainant was taken to the house of her p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
1- Challenging the order-dated 1.3.2006 Annexure P/6-A, petitioner has filed this writ petition. By the impugned order, an earlier order passed on 3.6.2005, granting pay in the scale Rs.4500-7000 has been cancelled and pay of the petitioner is fixed in a lower scale of Rs.4000-6000.2- Petitioner claims to be a Graduate having passed his B.Sc Examination. Thereafter, it is contended that he has passed MA, B.Ed and has also obtained a Diploma in Fine Arts from Government Polytechnic College, Jabalpur. On the basis of the aforesaid qualification he was appointed as an Artist in Agriculture Department, on 17.2.1979. He was initially posted at Narsinghpur and subsequently he was transferred to Jabalpur, where he was working, when this petition was filed. It is the case of the petitioner that on 4.11.2000, respondents had issued various orders in the matter of allocation of employees to the State of Chattisgarh. In the said list particulars of the employees, the post and the pay scales were ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
1- Petitioner Association, representing the employees of M.P. State Seed Certification Agency, claim grant of the benefits of 5th Pay Commission's recommendation with effect from 1.1.96 as per the decision of the Board of Directors of the State Seed Certification Agency.2- Petitioner Association, a registered Association, claims to be representing the Officers and Employees working in M.P. State Seed Certification Agency, which is an Association constituted under section 8 of the Seed Act, 1966. It is an autonomous independent body managed by the Board of Directors. The case of the petitioners is that after the 5th Pay Commission's recommendations were accepted by the Government and implemented with effect from 1.1.1996. Employees working in various other Corporations like M.P. Van Vikas Nigam, M.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation, M.P. Housing Board etc claimed the benefit and in their cases the benefit of 5th Pay Commission's recommendation were granted with effect from 1.1.1996. Wh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
1. The petitioners (defendants 1 to 4 and 6 to 10) have filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the orders passed by 2nd Civil Judge Class-II, Sihora in Civil Suit No.48-A/2008 dated 24/10/2009, by which the application filed by the plaintiffs under Order 12, Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been allowed and the order dated 01/01/2010, by which the application filed by the petitioners under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking direction to produce the evidence of defendant No.5 first has been rejected.2. The plaintiffs/respondents 1 to 8 have filed a suit seeking declaration of title, possession and permanent injunction against the petitioners and respondent No.9 with respect to the land of Mouza Muskuri, Nazool Bandobast 687/639 Patwari Halka No.50/78, Division Khitola, Tahsil Sihora, District Jabalpur of Khasra No.100 area 1.084 hectare (hereinafter referred to as 'the disputed land'). The said land was purchased by defendan...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
1. This petition has been filed against the order dated 25 th November, 2008 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench, whereby the Original Application No.126/2008 filed by respondent No.5 assailing the order of repatriation dated 13.2.2008 has been allowed by quashing the same.2. The respondent No.5 (herein) was applicant before the Central Administrative Tribunal who was appointed as Assistant Professor in National Institute of Technical Teachers Training & Research ( in short 'NITTTR'), Bhopal in 1986. On promotion as Professor, he was posted as Head of the Department, Centre for Rural Development NITTTR, Bhopal. The advertisement dated 29 th September, 2005 was issued by the Union of India inviting applications to the post of Joint Director in Pandit Sunderlal Sharma Central Institute of Vocational Education (in short "PSSCIVE"). The respondent No.5 had applied for the said post. After following due process, vide letter dated 06/03/2006 approval of his selectio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
1. This petition is directed against the order dated 7.4.2010 passed by XII Additional District Judge, Bhopal in Civil Suit No.122-A/2008, whereby the application filed by the petitioners under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been rejected with the observation that the application has been filed after about two years and no document has been produced to show that the property in dispute is ancestral property, more so it is not clear that the suit property is the ancestral property, however, the applicant is free to file fresh suit seeking declaration independently.2. The facts in brief are that plaintiffs Krishnakant Pastaria, Ramakant Pastaria and Shashikant Pastaria have filed a suit against Narmada Prasad Pastaria (father of the plaintiffs), Harish Kumar Pastaria, Girish Kumar Pastaria (brothers) and Smt Asha Purohit and Smt Neelu Setia (sisters) for declaration and rendition of account. It is averred in the plaint that in village Bawadiakala, Tehsil Huzoor Distic...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
1. The appellant has filed this appeal against judgment dated 11.7.1995 passed in S.T. No. 29/1993 by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Panna by which appellant Kalloo Bai has been convicted under Section 318 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment.2. The prosecution case in short was that marriage of appellant Kalloo Bai was solemnized many years before this incident but since 5-6 years she did not go to her in-laws house and had been living with her father Badri Prasad. In the month of December 1992, appellant Kalloobai gave birth to an illegal infant and conceal the birth of that infant. Co-accused Badri Prasad had left that infant near a Nallah due to which death of infant occurred. It is alleged that the body of infant was buried near the Nallah but this fact was came to the knowledge of villagers and they informed the police. On basis of this information, a Marg Intimation Ex.P/4 was recorded at Police Chouki Kalda. During investig...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
1/ Appellant has filed this appeal against the judgment dated 7.10.1995 passed by the Additional Session Judge, Katni in Trial No.28 of 1995, whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 20(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short 'the NDPS Act') and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years with fine of Rs.2,500/-. In default, the appellant shall suffer further rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months.2/ In short, the case of prosecution is that on 25.4.1995, B.D.Chaturvedi, (PW3) Assistant Sub Inspector, Police Station Katni received an information through an informer that a person, going with 'Ganja' at Bhatta Mohalla. On the basis of the aforesaid information, B.D.Chaturvedi, A.S.I. along with Sub Inspector, M.K. Singh (PW4) and Constable No.17, 2092, 763 rushed to Bhatta Mohalla and intercepted Gudda @ Om Prakash S/o. Mohanlal, who was carrying a box of Tin. After informing him that he has right to be searched in pre...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
1. Since both the aforesaid appeals arise out of the common judgment passed by the trial Court, this judgment shall govern the disposal of both the appeals.2. Appellants have filed these appeals against the judgment dated 7.4.2006, passed by the Special Judge (Atrocities), Narsinghpur, in Special Case No.51/2004, convicting and sentencing them as under:- CONVICTION SENTENCE U/s 148 IPC R.I. for two years and fine of Rs.1,000/- each, in default R.I. for two months.U/s 323/149 IPC R.I. for one year and fine of Rs.500/- each, in default R.I. for one months.U/s 325/149 IPC R.I. for two years and fine of Rs.1,000/- each, in default R.I. for two months.U/s 302/149 IPC R.I. for life and fine of Rs.2,000/- each, in default R.I. for four months.3. According to prosecution, on 11.7.2003, at about 9.00 p.m., complainant Sitaram Kuchbandiya submitted a written report (Ex.P/2) to Station Officer of Police Station, Paloha that at about 8.00 p.m., when he was at Gadarwara, he received information tha...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
1. By this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, petitioner has challenged the order dated 18.1.2010 passed by Special Judge (Lokayukt), Jabalpur in Special Case No. 8/2004, disposing of the application filed by the complainant/respondent no.2 under Sections 63 and 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, seeking permission to adduce secondary evidence.2. In brief, facts of the case are that the petitioner/accused S.K.Singh, who was posted as Inspector in Special Police Establishment (Lokayukta Office), Jabalpur laid a trap against respondent no.2 Hardayal Dubey, Food Inspector, Jabalpur and registered Crime No. 128/2002 under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. When S.K.Singh was investigating the said offence, he demanded Rs. 1,65,000/- from Hardayal Dubey, as bribe for showing favour to him. It is said that on 7.6.2002 and 27.6.2002, he obtained Rs. 30,000-30,000/- by abusing his position as a public servant. Hardayal...
Tag this Judgment!