Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents herein to permit the petitioner's husband Yohavasudevan, son of Yoharengaraj, now detained in Central Prison, Madurai concerned in Cr.No.96 of 2008 on the file of the fourth respondent, to participate in the Aruppukottai Panchayat Union Council Meeting scheduled on 24.08.2012 at 11.00 a.m.) ORDER 1. The petitioner is the wife of one Yohavasudevan. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks for a direction to permit her husband Yohavasudevan who is now detained in the Central Prison, in connection with Cr.No.96 of 2008 registered by the Inspector of Police, Aruppukottai Police Station - the fourth respondent, to participate in the Aruppukottai Panchayat Union Council Meeting scheduled to take place on 24.08.2012 at 11.00 a.m. 2. It is stated by the petitioner that the fourth respondent - the Inspector of Police, Aruppukottai Police Station, had...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer: Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased (1)to grant an order of interim injunction restraining the 3rd respondent from holding the post of President of the 4th respondent society.(2)to vacate the order of interim injunction granted by this Hon'ble Court in MP(MD)No.1/2012 in WP(MD)No.10730/2012 dated.02.08.2012.) ORDER This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. M. RAMALINGAM, Advocate for the petitioner in MP(MD)No.1/12 and 1st Respondent in MP(MD) No.2/12 in WP(MD)No.10730/2012 and of Mr.JEYAKARTHICK, Advocate for the 3rd Respondent in MP(MD)No.1/12 and Petitioner in MP(MD)2/12 in WP(MD)No.10730/2012 respectively, court made the following order:- In the main writ petition, the petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to arrange for an Election of the President/B...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the third respondent's impugned order in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.4323/2011/Aa2 dated 27.03.2012 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful administration of the Yadhava Trust to conduct temple poojas in Arulmighu Navaneethakrishnan and Chakkarathalvar Thirukkoil, Tallakulam, Madurai city administered by the Yadhava Trust and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the above circumstances.) ORDER In this Writ Petition, the petitioner is one K.Jayaselan S/o A.Krishnankonar. The petitioner seeks to challenge the order passed by the third respondent, the Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department in short, HR and CE Department dated 27.03.2012. After setting aside the same, seeks for a direction to the respo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the third respondent in his proceeding in Roc.No.5932/2009/D2 dated 18.05.2009 and quash the same and direct the third respondent to send the proposal to the first respondent for attachment of the salary of the borrowers by invoking section 3(ii) of Tamil Nadu Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1997.) ORDER 1. The petitioner in this writ petition is a Financial Institution covered by the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Protection of Interests of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1997. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has chosen to challenge the order passed by the third respondent namely the District Revenue Officer cum Competent Authority under the Tamil Nadu Protection of Interests of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1997, Theni District, dated 18.05.2009. 3. In view of the non-payment of t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent in his impugned Notification No.28/2012 dated 13.08.2012 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 herein to appoint the petitioners as Agriculture Officer (Extension) based on their Reserve List Seniority within a stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) ORDER 1. The petitioners approached this Court, for issuance of a Writ, in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the Notification No.28 of 2012 dated 13.08.2012, issued by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, inviting applications for appointment, to the post of Agricultural Officer (Extension), numbering 454 + 6 C/F. 2. The petitioners possessed the qualification of B.Sc., (Agriculture), and are registered with respective employment exchanges. An advertisement was issued by the Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records with respondent to impugned notification/Advertisement dated 24.11.2010, for direct recruitment to the post of Forest Apprentice in the Tamilnadu Forest Subordinate Service included in Group VI Services to the vacancies for the years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009 with regard to column 5(B) alone and consequent selection list dated 2.8.2012 and quash the same along with the consequent appointment and consequently direct the respondent to appoint the petitioner to the post of Forest Apprentice.) ORDER 1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Certiorari to quash Clause 5(B) of the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission Notification/Advertisement inviting application for the post of Forest Apprentice in the Tamil Nadu Forest Subordinate Service in Group VI Services. 2. Clause 5 (B) of the notification reads as under:- "5(B) ED...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned Notice in A1-3000-2012, dated 28.05.2012 issued by the 1st respondent and to quash the same.) ORDER 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned notice dated 28.05.2012 issued by the 1st respondent. 2. The petitioner is the wife of one Chiidambaram, whose mother is the 2nd respondent herein. 3. The 2nd respondent filed a complaint to the 1st respondent / Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, alleging that she is 83 years old and her husband is no more and there is a matrimonial dispute between her son and the petitioner herein and it is pending before the Family Court and the petitioner also filed a maintenance application. The petitioner has also given a complaint against the 2nd respondent and her son before the All Women Police Station and 2nd respondent's son is working in Malasia. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent dated 27.03.2012 made in Na.Ka.No.A1/245/2011/Sauthi and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to work in Gandhiar Middle School, Velayuthampalayam, Karur Panchayat Union, Karur.) ORDER 1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a Writ, in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the order of transfer. 2. It is the pleaded case of the petitioner, that the petitioner is employed as Noon Meal Organizer, and vide impugned order, she has been transferred from Gandhiar Middle School, Velayuthampalayam, Karur Panchayat Union, Karur District to Keelaveliyur, Thogamalai Panchayat Union. 3. It is submitted that the impugned order is contrary to the conditions of appointment, as appointment of Noon Meal Organizers are made from the same locality, and tr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the Impugned Charge Memo Nos.AUT-T/REGO/5722/2011(B) dated 27.03.2012, AUT-T/REGO/1025/2011(C) dated 30.03.2012 and AUT-T/REGO/AC-MC/038/PA/2011 (D) dated 12.04.2012 issued by the first respondent and quash the same. COMMON ORDER 1. This common order shall dispose of W.P.(MD)Nos.5042 to 5044 of 2012, as common question of law and facts are involved. 2. In these writ petitions, the petitioner prays for issuance of a Writ, in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the Charge Memos under Rule 17(a) of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules. 3. The only contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is, that the charge memos are without jurisdiction, as the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules are not applicable to the petitioner, as he is governed by Service Rules of Anna University. 4. Th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the respondents from appointing any candidate to the post of Cook by direct recruitment without considering the petitioner for appointment to the said post of Cook by promotion in the light of G.O.Ms.No.163 dated 18.08.2010 and by considering her representations dated 02.06.2012 and 04.06.2012 within the period that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.) ORDER 1. The petitioner has approached this Court, with a prayer for issuance of a Writ, in the nature of Mandamus, to prohibit the respondents, from appointing any candidate to the post of Cook, by direct recruitment, without considering the petitioner for the appointment, by promotion in the light of G.O.Ms.No.163 Social Welfare and Nutrition Scheme Department dated 18.08.2010. 2. In the G.O.Ms.No.163 Social Welfare and Nutrition Scheme Department dated 18.08.2010, the qualification prescribed for the ...
Tag this Judgment!