Phasing - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: phasing Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 4,581 results (0.055 seconds)Bell Vs. Cone
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-28-2002
..... relief rejecting his contention that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance during the sentencing phase by failing to present mitigating evidence and waiving final argument in affirming the ..... state postconviction relief contending that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance during the sentencing phase by failing to present mitigating evidence and by waiving final argument after a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJayaprakash Nanda and Jajranglal Agrawal Vs. General Manager, Orissa S ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jul-10-2002
Reported in: AIR2002Ori199; 94(2002)CLT578
..... consequential orders to them in respect of construction of 5000 mt godowns at malmunda phase i and phase ii respectively in the district of bolangir pursuant to acceptance letters vide annexure 3 ..... the tenders submitted by the petitioners in respect of construction of the godowns at phase i and phase ii subject to the condition that they would complete the construction within five months .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinndev Engineers (India) P. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Vidyut Board and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2002
Reported in: AIR2002Delhi478
..... to k no 014 5765296 at b 6 mayapuri industrial area phase i new delhi and disconnected the electricity supply through the said ..... respect of the electricity consumption at b 6 mayapuri industrial area phase i new delhi 6 learned counsel for the respondents has controverter ..... and the landlords of property no b 87 mayapuri industrial area phase i new delhi m s ram prakash kamal kishore regarding which .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCce Vs. Bhaskar Industries Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2002
Reported in: (2003)(85)ECC65
..... the assistant commissioner referring to the above facts and details regarding their process at different phases and requested for permission to utilise the credit of modvat amount now lying not entered ..... final product the appellants became entitled to credit on the capital goods installed during second phase according to the appellate authority there is no time limit for availing credit under the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajinder Kumar Vohra Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC
Decided on: Nov-18-2002
Reported in: I(2003)CPJ76MRTP
..... was within stipulated time the flat allotted was 26a ground floor phase ii jhilmil colony when the applicant complainant approached the respondent ..... ground floor he was mistakenly allotted a flat no 26a phase ii vivek vihar the mistake occurred as the concerned official ..... new delhi the information regarding allotment of an alternative flat 21a phase ii pocket b vivek vihar ground floor was passed on .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Yoga Priya Vs. the N.T.R. University of Health Sciences Rep. by Its ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALD188
..... 2 years is divided into 9 semesters each semester of 6 months three phases as follows phase distributing and timing of examination 6 months6 months6 months 121st professionalexamination during secondsemester ..... professional during 9th semester a passing in 1st professionals is compulsory before proceeding to phase ii training 14 further the same regulations dealing with attendance provides as follows .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSattazahn Vs. Pennsylvania
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-04-2002
..... 14 2003 under pennsylvania law 1 the verdict in the penalty phase of capital proceedings must be death if the jury unanimously finds ..... law the offense of which petitioner was convicted during the guilt phase of his proceedings is properly understood to be a lesser included ..... that is not what happened petitioner was convicted in the guilt phase of his first trial of the lesser offense of first degree .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWoodford Vs. Visciotti
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-04-2002
..... that respondent s trial counsel provided constitutionally inadequate representation during the trial s penalty phase but found that it did not prejudice the jury s sentencing decision the federal ..... court assumed that respondent s trial counsel provided constitutionally inadequate representation during the penalty phase but concluded that this did not prejudice the jury s sentencing decision id at .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOriental Hotels Ltd. Vs. Cc
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Nov-08-2002
Reported in: (2003)(86)ECC254
..... the various areas of the hotel they also noted that phase iv provided for supply of working drawings and designs by ..... of inspection initial concept identification of suppliers and tender negotiations b phase iv of the contract refers to the designs and drawings ..... of suppliers supervision and tender negotiation that the drawings as per phase iv had been received for the various periods indicated in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubhashish Talukder Vs. the Principal, M.R. Medical College and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-12-2002
Reported in: ILR2002KAR4644; 2002(6)KarLJ219
..... m r medical college gulbarga the petitioner appeared for the examination of phase i mbbs rs which was held in september october 2000 the subjects ..... to the respondents to permit the petitioner to appear for the examination phase i mbbs rs scheduled to be held on 18 9 2002 2 ..... are directed to permit the petitioner to take the physiology subject in phase i mbbs rs scheduled to be held on 18 9 2002 and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial