Phasing - Judgment Search Results

Man Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1998)120PLR20

r s mongia j 1 under the punjab police rules 1934 as amended from time to time for promotion from...

Arun Kumar Agrawal and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1999(1)KarLJ603

..... associated equipment as more specifically described in appendix 6 the facility and ii the second phase shall consist of two nominal 250 mw gross 230 mw net generating units with an ..... with coal fired boilers and other associated equipment as more specifically described in the phase two ppa the phase two facility andwhereas the company desires to interconnect with the board system in .....

Minnesota Vs. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians

Court: US Supreme Court

..... as defendants 1 the district court bifurcated the case into two phases phase i of the litigation would determine whether and to what ..... the 1837 treaty rights with the mille lacs litigation for phase ii in phase ii the state and the bands agreed to a ..... lacs band retained any usufructuary rights under the 1837 treaty while phase ii would determine the validity of particular state measures regulating .....

Monge Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... reasoning in that case was the capital sentencing context the penalty phase of a capital trial is undertaken to assess the gravity ..... and that opportunity extends not only to prosecution at the guilt phase but also to present evidence at an ensuing sentencing proceeding ..... trial can be bifurcated without sacrificing jury factfinding in the second phase see almendarez torres 523 u s 224 261 269 1998 .....

Kurikattil Rubber Industries and ors. Vs. Kerala State Electricity Boa ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1999Ker254

..... the minimum given below 1 domestic single phase rs 50 2 domestic three phase rs 250 3 non domestic single phase rs 75 4 do three phase rs 300 5 agriculture rs 20 perhp .....

Bachcha Singh ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

..... the scheme so prepared the petitioners will be regularised in phased manner as and when vacancy arises the respondent authorities are ..... creation of post for regularisationing the services of writ petitioners in phased manner and status quo order with regard to the writ ..... frame scheme and regularise the services of the petitioners in phased manner as and when vacancies arise from the order passed .....

Bragdon Vs. Abbott

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the initial stage subside the disease enters what is referred to sometimes as its asymptomatic phase the term is a misnomer in some respects for clinical features persist throughout including ..... from a purely scientific perspective persons with hiv are clearly impaired even during the asymptomatic phase olc determined asymptomatic hiv was a physical impairment under the rehabilitation act because it .....

Harbans Singh and ors. Vs. G.S. Sandhu, Lt. Col. and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1999)122PLR705

..... 2 plaintiffs appellants herein filed suit for possession of plot no 18 c phase ii s a s nagar mohali measuring 1 kanal by way of ..... 3 marias situated in village pachranga district jalandhar with plot no 18 c phase ii s a s nagar mohali he alleged that the rights between ..... the defendants opp3 whether the defendant agreed to sell plot n0 18 c phase ii sas nagar in favour of the plaintiffs for rs 3 75 .....

Wipro Ge Medical Systems Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1999)(106)ELT169Tri(Chennai)

..... load of current cannot be drawn in india on a single phase without this component system cannot work b all imported components ..... ii the appellants have designed and fabricated one essential component themselves phase convertor and power unit this is not an accessory which ..... purposes were component parts to which a 6th essential item phase convertor of indigenous origin was added by the appellants 24 .....

Geeta Devi Vs. Chandigarh Administration, Through Its Administrator

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1999)121PLR88

..... their land was acquired for the development of third phase and not the second phase of capital project as contemplated by clause 12 ..... scheme because their land was acquired for the development of third phase of chandigarh city this is not one of the grounds ..... land was acquired for development of third phase of chandigarh city and not the second phase the finance secretary chandigarh to whom reference .....