Phasing - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: phasing Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.045 seconds)M.M. Bhatt and Others Vs. Delhi Jal Board, Govt. of Nct of Delhi, Varu ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2012
dr ramesh chandra panda member a ma no 1536 2011 1 respondents have moved this ma under rule 15 2...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Gulraj Engineering Construction Co. Vs. Hotel Corporation of Indi ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-07-2012
..... itself shows the claims and its details referring to phase i and phase ii the petitioners have also principally restricted the submission ..... specific escalation clause and formula no establishment charges for phase i and phase ii were awarded as remarked the interest on the ..... inception and negotiations before the proceedings with the additional work phase ii the award if so passed by overlooking the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Gulraj Engineering Construction Co. Vs. Hotel Corporation of Indi ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-07-2012
..... itself shows the claims and its details referring to phase i and phase ii the petitioners have also principally restricted the submission ..... specific escalation clause and formula no establishment charges for phase i and phase ii were awarded as remarked the interest on the ..... inception and negotiations before the proceedings with the additional work phase ii the award if so passed by overlooking the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Suven Nishtaa Pharma Private Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Directo ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-13-2012
..... with a contracted maximum demand cmd of 500 kva in two phases of 250 kva each the 2nd respondent sanctioned the same and ..... been complied with as the date of release of the second phase power supply was already fixed question of issuing notice does not ..... have not issued any notice expressing the readiness to release the second phase of 250 kva and without issuing such notice the respondents are .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSurinder Singh Brar and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-11-2012
..... that the power line in the entire area comprising ctp phase i and phase ii may be shifted underground along the roads 5 five ..... pointed out that substantial portion of the land acquired for phase i and phase ii of it park had been allotted to it industries ..... to review the progress of development of the first amp second phases of rajiv gandhi chandigarh technology park the following officers were present .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS. Tel Private Limited (Bihar) Vs. Union of India
Court: Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT
Decided on: Sep-26-2012
..... pradesh are concerned the petitioner has complied with its both phase i and phase ii roll out obligations apart from the aforementioned bank ..... to north eastern states it has only completed the first phase of its roll out obligations admittedly the petitioner has applied ..... event would become meaningless the same would render the second phase of roll out obligations otiose 8221 emphasis added in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKerala State Electricity Board, Rep. by Its Secretary, Vydhuthi Bhavan ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-30-2012
..... the kseb along with their local engineer during inspection the team noticed that the b phase of the ct power meter was reverse connected thereby neutralising even consumption recorded in the ..... in the meter which justifies estimation of consumption even though the very finding that one phase was recording consumption in the reverse direction itself will justify estimation still the deputy chief .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsst.Executive Engineer Electrical Section, Kseb Kottackal, Malappuram ...
Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram
Decided on: Oct-31-2012
..... opposite parties in the site mahazer it is mentioned that one phase of the meter was not functioning properly due to deposit of ..... section on inspection it was found that only two phases of the 3 phase meter were recording consumption on calibration the meter showed ..... the site mahazer and the conclusion recorded therein that the y phase of the meter was not recording consumption as pointed out by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajenderpal Singh Bhatia Vs. Joginder Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
..... properties been partitioned some portions of property no c 114 naraina phase i and a portion of property no 13 39 western eastern ..... no 5 shifted their business to c 114 naraina industrial area phase i whereas the plaintiff and defendant no 3 surinder singh were ..... portion of the property bearing number c 114 naraina industrial area phase i had come in exclusive possession of defendant no 5 shri .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.Ekambaram. Vs. the Secretary and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-03-2012
..... chennai beach to tharamani to be implemented in two phases viz phase i and phase ii and ii the inner circular corridor covering an ..... from velacherry to st thomas mount for mass rapid transit system phase ii extension the said government order was also published in the ..... to as mrts was originally planned to be implemented in 4 phases it is supposed to cover i the radial arterial corridor from .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial