Phasing - Judgment Search Results

The Management of Sree Venkateswara Industries No. 417 (21 Phase) Sidc ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: II(2001)ACC754; (2001)3MLJ264

order1 this writ petition is the classic example of the abuse of court s process a few facts would be...

General Manager, Telecom Vs. Mrs. Janak Gupta and Others

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

..... telephone aforesaid had been installed at shed no 3126 industrial area phase ii chandigarh against her instructions and in collusion with the ..... the telephone had been installed at shed no 3126 industrial area phase ii chandigarh as per the application of the complainant and ..... shifting of the telephone from shed no 3126 industrial area phase ii chandigarh to the place now mentioned by the complainant .....

Nirmal Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2003)133PLR110

..... development department at which the area site actual measurements the sector phase were decided and without the approval of the same signatories no ..... punjab housing and urban development department vide which scf no 88 phase v was resumed as being illegal unjust without jurisdiction against the ..... be at liberty to surrender the site of scf no 88 phase v and get the refund of their money the petitioners .....

Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. Vs. Army Corps of Engineers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 123 the 1975 regulations provided that the new program would become effective in three phases phase 1 which became effective immediately encompassed the navigable waters covered by the 1974 ..... regulation and the rha phase 2 effective after july 1 1976 extended corps jurisdiction to nonnavigable tributaries freshwater .....

Suraj Enterprises Private Limited Vs. Punjab Small Industries and Expo ...

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

..... no 1 claiming penalty compensation for transferring plot no e 482 phase vi focal point ludhiana in favour of shri subhash chander lakra ..... is not the allottee of the said plot no e 432 phase vi ludhiana the other introductory facts have been admitted in paragraph ..... the transferee allottee company with reference to plot no e 432 phase vi focal point ludhiana it was further submitted that the opposite .....

M/S. Terene Fibres India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2001)(138)ELT889Tri(Mum.)bai

..... ril were protected from any damage to eth plant during the job phase clause 12 clause 10 was peculiarly worded it spoke of improvements ..... the appellants that ril was a financing company therefore for this phase also tifl could not claim the credit 9 it is not ..... the cited sub rule underwent drastic revision during these three phases where the first phase was worded so as to confer benefit of an owner .....

Penry Vs. Johnson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... fifth amendment analysis might be different where a defendant introduces psychiatric evidence at the penalty phase id at 472 indeed the court has never extended estelle s fifth amendment holding beyond ..... are to consider 790 mitigating circumstances if any supported by the evidence presented in both phases of the trial whether presented by the state or the defendant a mitigating circumstance may .....

Forum for a Better Hyderabad, (Confederation of Voluntary Organisation ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2001(4)ALT275

..... buddha poornima project area prediction of environmental impacts during both the construction and the operation phase at the project site for the proposed activities are discussed below changes in land ..... construction site the quantum of dust generated re entertainment during vehicular movement in the constructional phase will depend upon a number of factors such as soil moisture content nature and .....

Paramjit Saini and ors. Vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority and an ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR2002P& H261

..... grievance of the petitioners is that for undertaking the construction of phase ii respondent no 3 has got the plans revised from haryana ..... no 3 has failed to provide adequate car scooter parking in phase i of the housing project and thereby it has committed breach ..... completed a part of the housing scheme which it termed as phase i as noticed earlier 188 dwelling units were constructed according to .....

E.i.H. Limited Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR2001Raj236; 2001(4)WLN99

..... the peiitioner company to stop construction work with immediate effect of phase second of hotel trident 2 the city of udaipur is known ..... has also granted permission to the said hotel owner for second phase construction upto 31 3 2001 therefore the second part of the ..... by ihe petitioner for extension of lime for completion of second phase of hotel trident the application shall be decided within a period .....