Phasing - Judgment Search Results

Kajaria Ceramics Limited Vs. Trade Tax Tribunal and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2000]119STC117(All)

..... the divisional level committee wherein the expansion in first phase and second phase is stated it is further submitted that the argument ..... investment of 40 038 m t in earlier first phase and second phase it appears from the order passed by the tribunal ..... of eligibility certificate in respect of expansion undertaken in three phases however subsequently the definition of fixed capital investment was .....

A.D.S. Builders Guild Vs. Golden Tourist Resorts and Developer Ltd. an ...

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: [2003]115CompCas171(HP),[2004]50SCL314(HP)

..... the matter relating to difference of the rates relating to first phase and second phase would be settled by the chairman cum managing director of ..... that a the rates quoted in the tender in respect of first phase required to be revised due to increase in the price of ..... matter relating to the rates in respect of the work of second phase is settled once for all however the respondent company failed to .....

Geier Vs. American Honda Motor Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... most effective system of all for preventing fatalities and injuries the secretary therefore included a phase in period in order to encourage manufacturers to comply with the standard by installing airbags ..... if the extra credit provided for the use of nonbelt passive restraint technologies during the phase in period had as the secretary hoped ultimately encouraged manufacturers to develop a nonbelt .....

Ramanand Yadav Vs. Vijay Singh Yadav and ors.

Court: Patna

..... counting the counting is done candidatewise so according to the respondent while in the first phase the ballot papers for both parliamentary and assembly constituencies were separated and then bundles were ..... prepared in the second phase counting for the assembly constituency was done on 14 tables and 7 tables each in .....

Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2000SC3751; (2001)1GLR434; 2000(7)SCALE34; (2000)10SCC664; [2000]Supp4SCR94

..... the following details were sought from the project authorities 1 rehabilitation master plan2 phased catchment area treatment scheme3 compensatory afforestation plan4 command area development5 survey of flora ..... of suitable species for biological treatment of the catchment area and preparation of phased action programme for biological and engineering treatment of the degraded catchment area considering .....

Ramdass Vs. Angelone

Court: US Supreme Court

..... determined a defendant s parole eligibility and that determination would come after the sentencing phase then current south carolina case law unambiguously stated that the eligibility determination would not ..... parole ineligibility purposes until some point in time well after the capital murder sentencing phase the state could convert the simmons requirement into an opt in constitutional rule 30 .....

Tamil Nadu Flat Promoters Association Rep. by Its Presidents, S.T.S. L ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2000)1MLJ539

..... board to collect the charges at flat rate for effecting single phase and three phase connections in the flats cannot be sustained in law and ..... to pay a fixed amount per flat for availing single phase supply and three phase supply if it is a residential flat they have to ..... it was proposed to collect flat rates only for single and three phase connections in the built up flats 6 under the provisions of .....

Cref Finance Ltd. Vs. Puri Construction Ltd. and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2000(3)ARBLR331(Delhi)

..... third parties the rest of the area covered by the first phase of development in consideration of such earmarked allotment cref is directed ..... the built up area these shares were scattered throughout the different phases the argument continues that if this was so it was not ..... open to the cref to claim areas within the first phase as observed above the commitments made by pcl before the learned .....

Lambert Kroger Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2000IVAD(Delhi)507; 85(2000)DLT46

..... the original member first will get rs 29 500 worth gold in phase iii the sixteen members appointed in phase ii will have to further appoint four members each upon which the ..... original member first member will get rs 29 500 worth gold in phase iii the sixteen members appointed in phase ii will have to further appoint four members each upon which the .....

Williams Vs. Taylor, Warden

Court: US Supreme Court

..... is a reasonable probability that the result of the sentencing phase would have been different id at 429 judge ingram therefore ..... recommended that williams be granted a rehearing on the sentencing phase of his trial the virginia supreme court did not accept ..... there existed a reasonable probability that the result of the sentencing phase would have been different if the jury had heard that .....