Phasing - Judgment Search Results

Khedut Sahakari Khand Udyog Mandali Ltd. and ors. Vs. Its Workmen and ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1979)1GLR858

..... pay and that there was no justification for the industrial tribunal to phase the relief which it was granting on the footing that the ..... involved in the instant case we have already observed above that the phasing which has been provided for in the award is not justified ..... we have stated above that there is no justification whatsoever for the phasing on the facts as disclosed on the record of the case .....

Bachan Singh S/O Saudagar Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1982)3SCC24; 19831SCR145;

..... taken into account before death sentence can be handed down they also provided for separate phases of the trial to determine guilt and punishment and for automatic appellate review of ..... the ground that providing specific sentencing guidelines to be followed in a separate post conviction phase of the trial would free the sentencing decision of arbitrariness and discrimination there is considerable .....

Union of India Vs. Manchanda Brothers and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1979P& H255

..... regarding the construction of quarters was to be completed in two phases phase i was to be completed within nine months and phase ii within 18 months with the issuance of the work .....

Lenhard Vs. Wolff

Court: US Supreme Court

..... himself and to decline to introduce any mitigating evidence at the sentencing phase of the capital trial the court further held that the nevada ..... faretta to waive is right to present mitigating evidence at the sentencing phase of his trial the sentencing court s refusal to allow the ..... that he had refused to take the stand at the sentencing phase of his trial and to allow any member of his family .....

Spenkelink Vs. Wainwright

Court: US Supreme Court

..... ground id at 11 cole v arkansas which presnell simply extended to the sentencing phase of a capital trial was after all decided in 1948 and was not then ..... 333 u s 196 1948 apply with no less force at the penalty phase of a trial in a capital case than they do in the guilt ..... determining phase of any criminal trial 439 u s at 16 cole in turn had .....

Management of Shri Chalthan Vibhag Khand Udyog Sahakari Mandli Ltd. Vs ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1980SC31; (1980)0GLR584; (1979)IILLJ383SC; (1979)4SCC622; [1980]1SCR509; 1980(1)SLJ31(SC)

..... the award and set it aside it also found that there was no justification for phasing as awarded by the industrial court and therefore quashed it and set it aside it ..... quashed and set aside 2 there is no justification for the phasing awarded by the industrial court and hence the phasing is quashed and set aside 3 x x x x 4 .....

Chairman, the Orissa State Electricity Board and anr. Vs. Jayashree Ch ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1980Ori20; 49(1980)CLT487

..... contention taking the legal principle enunciated in the decisions i hold that the termination notice phasing surcharge in place of interest period of 15 years inserted in several clauses and insertion ..... in view of this finding termination notice in clause 1 insertions in clause 3 regarding phasing schedule appended to general conditions insertion in clause 13 other than the rate and quantity .....

Director, Owcp Vs. Rasmussen

Court: US Supreme Court

..... welfare by the subcommittee on labor p 67 1972 hereinafter leg hist the four step phase in of the section s maximum limitation from 125 to 200 of the applicable national ..... receiving death benefits receive less than the compensation they would receive if there were no phase in their compensation is to be increased as the ceiling moves to 200 percent s .....

Green Vs. Georgia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... be vacated the excluded testimony was highly relevant to a critical issue in the punishment phase of the trial and substantial reasons existed to assume its reliability perhaps most important the ..... fourteenth amendment the excluded testimony was highly relevant to a critical issue in the punishment phase of the trial see lockett v ohio 438 u s 586 438 u s 604 .....

Southeastern Commun. Coll. Vs. Davis

Court: US Supreme Court

..... understand speech without reliance on lip reading is necessary for patient safety during the clinical phase of the program as the district court found this ability also is indispensable for many ..... instructor would be sufficient to ensure patient safety if respondent took part in the clinical phase of the nursing program see 424 f supp at 1346 furthermore it also is reasonably .....