Phasing - Judgment Search Results

Madras Refineries Ltd. Vs. Southern Petrochemical Industries Corporati ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1999]95CompCas213(Mad)

..... appraisal dated september 28 1993 idbi recommended two stage implementation pta pfy in the first phase and naphtha to px later after detailed evaluation arochem accepted this recommendation subsequently arochem ..... approached idbi for its appraisal of pta pfy project of first phase implementation and the report was given on november 5 1993 for an integrated pta .....

Buchanan Vs. Angelone

Court: US Supreme Court

..... by this court while petitioner appropriately recognizes the distinction between the eligibility and selection phases he fails to distinguish the differing constitutional treatment we have accorded those two ..... discretion to consider mitigating evidence petitioner s argument that the jury at the selection phase must both have discretion to make an individualized determination and have that discretion .....

Aloke Kumar Ghosh and ors. Vs. Calcutta Municipal Corporation and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1997)2CALLT249(HC)

..... security the existing stall holders would be relocated temporarily in phases to facilitate the construction and the cost of relocation ..... other stall holders would be temporarily shifted so that each phase of the construction is completed without actually disturbing the ..... being earmarked for accommodating the stall holders during the various phases of the construction to the same effect are the .....

Raj Kumar and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1998)119PLR292

..... setting up urban estates the acquisition for 2nd and 3rd phases were made in march 1974 and january 1975 respective ..... the revenue estate of bhatinda was acquired for establishing three phase residential urban estate bhatinda town the collector assessed the compensation ..... limits fencing of the cantonment or from the boundary iii phase of urban estate bhatinda town the compensation was determined atrs .....

Pardeep Rattan Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1998)118PLR646

..... 3rd respondent stated that he originally started living in scf no 34 phase v and thereafter he started living in the house of his wife ..... s cousin bearing no 709 phase vi mohali alongwith the uncle of his wife he further stated ..... from abroad and therefore he shifted his residence to house no 690 phase vi mohali he further averred that his parental village is in patiala .....

Siddhartha Kumar and Others Vs. Upper Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gh ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1998(1)AWC593; (1998)1UPLBEC587

..... other civil proceedings including execution applications etc expeditiously or and within the time to be phased by this court as exemplars the following four writ petitions have been culled out to ..... it is essential that there should be intermittent training courses for the judicial officers in phases there is a well established judicial training and research institute in the state fortunately it .....

Grindlays Bank P.L.C. Vs. Centre for Development of Instructional Tech ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1997IIAD(Delhi)200; AIR1997Delhi164; II(1997)BC232; [1997]88CompCas782(Delhi); 65(1997)DLT936; 1997(40)DRJ817

..... 31st december 1983 and interim report was to be submitted 15 days after completion of phase ii and the final report was to be submitted 30 days after completion of ..... phase iv as already noticed the remuneration of 15000 us dollars was payable by defendant no .....

Lambrix Vs. Singletary

Court: US Supreme Court

..... aggravating circumstances to be weighed against any mitigating circumstances at a capital trial s sentencing phase is required to give deference to a jury s advisory sentencing recommendation then neither ..... that requires specified aggravating circumstances to be weighed against any mitigating circumstances at the sentencing phase of a capital trial is required to give deference to a jury s advisory .....

Joginder Pal Vohra and ors. Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 1998CriLJ2592

..... vij being partners of m s navax pharmaceuticals 30 industrial area phase i panchkula shri o p verma manufacturing chemist of m ..... no gn 20 b manufactured by navax pharmaceuticals30 ind area phase i panchkula intact identical with the specimen seal 6 condition ..... 20 manufactured by m s navax pharmaceuticals 30 industrial area phase i panchkula method b p description colourless liquid with suspended .....

Mukesh Kumar Ajmera Vs. State of Rajasthan and 11 ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1997(2)WLC672; 1997(1)WLN682

..... of implementing its policy implementation of a policy in a phased manner is not prohibited by article 14 of the constitution ..... doubt that when nationalisation has to be done in a phased manner all the institutions cannot be taken over at a ..... over therefore in implementing the nationalisation of private institutions in a phased manner the legislature has started with the institute therefore the .....