Misstatement - Judgment Search Results

Dr. Ambika Prasad Sinha S/O Dr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

1 by this oa applicant has challenged respondents order dated 10 2 2006 which is promotion list of selection grade...

T.G. Venkatesh Vs. Registrar of Companies

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [2008]145CompCas662(AP); [2007]78SCL1(AP)

..... the premise of the false statement issued by the company the misstatement as alleged relates to the inflation of the profits of ..... discharges or acquits the promoters of any allegation that the alleged misstatements in the prospectus were made with any dishonest intention of practicing ..... scope of section 633 of the act vis a vis the misstatements in the prospectus held that the company was not included .....

R.K.K.R. Steels Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2006)(112)ECC415

..... be given it appears from the records that the required particulars of the allegation of misstatement suppression of facts were not furnished to the party in the circumstances there is substance ..... shall be able to file a detailed reply to the aforesaid notice misstatement suppression of facts kindly specify the misstatement or suppression with respect to shipping bills so that suitable reply can .....

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Precot Mills Limited

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2007)(212)ELT483Tri(Chennai)

..... been levied or paid by reason of fraud collusion or wilfull misstatement or suppression of facts on the part of the assessee or ..... only there is no mention in it of any collusion willful misstatement or suppression of fact by the appellants for the purposes of ..... aware that the allegation against him is of collusion or willful misstatement or suppression of fact this is a requirement of natural justice .....

Kothari and Company Vs. Cit

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: (2006)204CTR(MP)298

..... of the filing of the return which contains the concealment or misstatement as the case may be that is relevant and not the ..... of the filing of the retuin which contains the concealment or misstatement as the case may be that is relevant and not the ..... return whether original and or revised which contained the alleged concealment or misstatement 16 to same effect the madhya pradesh high court in the .....

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Filtronic

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

..... said firm had actually suppressed any material facts or made any willful misstatement with intent to evade payment of duty even in the show ..... cause notices the clause of fraud collusion or any misstatement etc has not been invoked in order to make the demand ..... find that there is a case of suppression of facts or willful misstatement with intent to evade payment of duty 8 the department in .....

Commr. of C. Ex. Vs. Illpea Paramount Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 2006(204)ELT22(P& H); 2006[4]STR416

..... erroneously refunded by reasons of fraud collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts or contravention of any of the ..... erroneously refunded by reasons of fraud collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts or contravention of any of the ..... erroneously refunded by reason of fraud collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts or contravention of any of the .....

Commr. of C. Ex. Vs. Amdalavalasa Co-op. Sugars Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2006)(107)ECC16

..... beyond the due date or that the appellant failed to submit any returns admittedly a misstatement on the quantum of production of molasses furnished in the returns is being referenced but ..... appellant assumes greater responsibility having come under self assessment procedure nevertheless a charge of willful misstatement in the returns with intent to evade payment of duty is not sustained since the .....

Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Vs. Cce, Aurangabad

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

..... paid short levied or short paid or erroneously refunded because of either fraud collusion wilful misstatement suppression of fact or contravention of any provision or rules this court has held that ..... duty and or take out a licence which is not due to fraud or wilful misstatement or suppression of facts or contravention of any provision is not sufficient to attract the .....

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Satguru Engineering and

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

..... confirmed as the demands are barred by time he has noted that the assessee neither misstated nor suppressed any material information at the time of clearing the impugned goods the allegation ..... had also noted that there is no allegation of suppression of any material information or misstatement or fraud he has applied the ratio of the tribunal s ruling in the case .....