Misstatement - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: misstatement Year: 1980 Page 1 of about 17 results (0.009 seconds)Arvind Gupta Vs. University of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-13-1980
Reported in: ILR1981Delhi28
sachar j 1 this petition challenges theaction of the respondent university in not having permilted the petitioner to take sixth...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBaldasar Vs. Illinois
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-22-1980
baldasar v illinois 446 u s 222 1980 u s supreme court baldasar v illinois 446 u s 222 1980...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPurushottamlal Kaushik Vs. Vidyacharan Shukla
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-05-1980
Reported in: AIR1980MP188; 1980MPLJ644
orderj s verma j 1 the petitioner purshottamlal kaushik and the respondent vidya charan shukla were two of the contesting...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAaron Vs. Sec
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-02-1980
..... strongly defended the theory that it would be preferable to place liability for negligent misstatements on the shoulders of those responsible for their dissemination rather than to require innocent ..... the importance to the investing public of the commission s authority to prevent negligent misstatements the proposed federal securities code drafted by the american law institute provides the commission .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States. R. Retirement Bd. Vs. Fritz
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-09-1980
..... committee without any amendment relevant to this case footnote 3 9 of course a misstatement or several misstatements by witnesses before congress would not ordinarily lead us to conclude that congress misapprehended ..... was drafted by outside parties and congress relied on them to explain it where the misstatements are frequent and unrebutted and where no member of congress can be found to have .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrown Vs. Glines
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-21-1980
..... the constitutional rights of servicemen both were censored the former because it contain ed gross misstatements and implications of law and fact and impugn ed by innuendo the motives and ..... under the authority of similar regulations prohibited the circulation of petitions because they contained gross misstatements and implications of law and fact as well as impugning by innuendo the motives and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGopal Paper and Board Mills Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-1980
Reported in: 1981(8)ELT97(Del)
..... through inadvertence error collusion or mis construction on the part of an officer or through misstatement as to the quantity description or value of such goods on the part of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSudesh Kumar Vs. Atam Parkash and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-1980
Reported in: 20(1981)DLT9; ILR1980Delhi409
..... question there may also be cases where material irregularity is the result of deliberate fraud misstatement or mis representation the further proviso added by the punjab high court to rule 90 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Tamil Nadu-iv Vs. C.S. Ayyaswamy Iyer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-10-1980
Reported in: (1980)19CTR(Mad)236; [1981]132ITR97(Mad)
..... any reference to the hindu law of succession itself or to change the law of misstate share inheritance in fact if the argument of the learned counsel for the revenue is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Muniya Debi Kanoria, Proprietor Sree Mahabir Oil and Flour Mills ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-25-1980
Reported in: 1981(8)ELT363(Cal)
..... levied through inadvertence error collusion or misconstruction on the part of an officer or through misstatement as to the quantity etc the period of limitation is three months from the date .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial