Misstatement - Judgment Search Results

State of Kerala Vs. Ammini and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1988Ker1

thomas j 1 a woman by name merly and her two little children were found lying dead in their bed...

Town of Newton Vs. Rumery

Court: US Supreme Court

town of newton v rumery 480 u s 386 1987 u s supreme court town of newton v rumery 480...

Shahzad Hasan Khan Vs. Ishtiaq Hasan Khan and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC1613; 1987CriLJ1872; 1987(2)Crimes438(SC); JT1987(2)SC323; 1987(1)SCALE1249; (1987)2SCC684; [1987]3SCR34

1 this appeal is directed against the order of the high court of allahabad lucknow bench dated 7th june 1986...

Dr. Krishna Prasad Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: II(1988)ACC423; ILR1988KAR923

orderkulkarni j 1 the accused by this petition requests for quashing theproceedings in c c no 832 of 1987 pending...

i.T.C. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1989Cal294,92CWN1035,1988(16)ECC68,1988(34)ELT473(Cal)

..... duty was leviable and collected but it appeared that the petitioner had committed fraud wilful misstatement and suppression of fact by deliberating a printing price at a lower figure than really ..... if it could be established thatthere had been short payment of excise dutybecause of wilful misstatement and or mis representation it was submitted that on trueinterpretation of the notification it was .....

Mahfooz Hasan Vs. Harish Chandra Sahai

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1988All69

..... recorded by learned lower court stand vitiated being based on misstatement of fact apparent on the face of the record learned ..... plaintiffs witnesses has been rejected is based on altogether a misstatement of fact referring to the pleadings in the plaint learned ..... record in rejecting the evidence of the plaintiffs witnesses by misstating the fact that it is inconsistent with the pleadings contained .....

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Central India Board Products

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1987)(11)LC734Tri(Delhi)

..... unveneered particle boards 8 the learned counsel said that there was no misstatement and he then read the order of the assistant collector which ..... this is so he said there cannot be any charge of misstatement he also referred to paragraph 10 and paragraph 11 of their ..... collector however was wrong to say that there had been a misstatement he himself says that there had been a misunderstanding in the .....

Asian Paints (India) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1988)(15)ECC189

..... or mis construction on the part of the officer or through misstatement as to the quantity description or value of such goods on ..... collusion or misconstruction on the part of an officer or through misstatement as to the quantity description or value of such goods on ..... collusion or misconstruction on the part of an officer or through misstatement as to the quantity description or value of such goods on .....

Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1989)(44)ELT471TriDel

..... s order and vehemently denied that there had been any wilful misstatement for the purposes of evading duty the collector relied solely on ..... as a matter of fact the story of suppression and wilful misstatement is a hollow one because the appellate collector of central excise ..... entitled to the exemption so there can be no misdeclaration or misstatement after that but this is not the real point 16 the .....

Mahabir Jute Mills Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1988)LC554Tri(Delhi)

..... first noted that the show cause notice contains no allegation as to fraud collusion wilful misstatement or suppression of fact on the part of the appellants nor to contravention of any ..... circumstances it is apparent that there could have been no case of fraud collusion wilful misstatement or suppression of fact alleged against the appellants with reference to the manufacture of such .....