Misstatement - Judgment Search Results

Jogl Sada Vs. State of Bihar

Court: Patna

narinder s rao j 1 jogi sada the appellant stands convicted under section 307 of the indian penal code to...

United Felts and Carpets Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1996)(81)ELT609TriDel

1 this appeal arises out of and is directed against the order in original dated 8 11 1991 passed by...

Kusum Alloys (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1995)(77)ELT602Tri(Chennai)

1 stay the above application has been filed for waiver of pre deposit of duty of rs 3 17 782...

Limenaph Chemicals Vs. Union of India

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1993(44)ECC79; 1993(68)ELT77(Mad)

..... or erroneously refunded by reason of fraud collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts or contravention of any of the ..... in those circumstances the only question will be whether there was misstatement of facts by the petitioner there is no doubt about ..... which go to prove that there was a deliberate misdeclaration and misstatement of facts paragraphs 12 and 13 of the impugned order .....

Birla Jute and Industries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and a ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1994(69)ELT14(MP); 1993(0)MPLJ924

..... s birla vikas cement satna had knowingly and deliberately by reason of collusion and wilful misstatement and suppression of facts in regards to manufacture of cement clinker removed the aforesaid ..... extended period of limitation as the petitioners have not exercised fraud collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of the facts to the excise authorities neither have contravened any of .....

Godrej Food Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1993(44)ECC220; 1993LC426(MP); 1993(68)ELT28(MP); 1994(0)MPLJ148

..... act alleging that there was suppression of facts and wilful misstatement on the part of the petitioners while getting the goods ..... refunded by reasons of either fraud or collusion or wilful misstatement of suppression of facts or contravention of any provision of ..... and circumstances there was any fraud or collusion or wilful misstatement or suppression or contravention of any provision of any act .....

Collector of Central Excise Vs. thermax (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1994)(70)ELT247TriDel

..... no allegation in the show cause notices regarding any wilful misstatement suppression of fact fraud etc the normal time limit of ..... show cause notice it was accordingly alleged that they have wilfully misstated suppressed the relevant facts with the sole intention to evade ..... central excise 1992 43 ecr 629 tribunal in case of misstatement of the value extended period of limitation is invokable tata .....

Navalsinh Chandansinh Rajput Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1994)2GLR1642

..... has observed as under 29 it is quite apparent that the so called factual misstatements are not misstatements at all the high court rightly held that the alleged mistakes or infirmities pointed ..... have acted in that case the supreme court has held that the alleged factual misstatements were not misstatements at all it is further held the alleged mistakes or infirmities pointed cut were .....

Nathan Jewellers and ors. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1994)(52)LC21Tri(Chennai)

..... has been erroneously refunded by reason of collusion or any wilful misstate ment or suppression of facts by the importer or the exporter ..... that the appellants had by reason of collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of fact had tried to defraud the revenue the ..... after the clearance of the goods the appellants had suppressed or misstated any facts in regard to the goods cleared by them it .....

Smith Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... false statement material to the lawfulness of a gun s transfer because making a material misstatement in order to acquire or sell a gun is not use of the gun even ..... expanded the statutory language as a result a gun with respect to which a material misstatement is made is subject to forfeiture because even though the gun is not used in .....