Misstatement - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: misstatement Year: 1983 Page 1 of about 26 results (0.007 seconds)Tuten Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-30-1983
tuten v united states 460 u s 660 1983 u s supreme court tuten v united states 460 u s...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome-tax Officer Vs. Maddi Satyanarayana and Co. (P.)
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-30-1983
Reported in: (1984)8ITD249(Hyd.)
1 these appeals are by the revenue and they arise out of a common order of the commissioner appeals the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSriram Pistons and Rings Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-14-1983
Reported in: (1983)LC1227DTri(Delhi)
..... fact suppresio veri suggestio falsi it would be observed that wilful misstatement or suppression of facts occurring in the proviso to rule ..... in which the appellant did not believe in i e no misstatement no suppressio veri suggestio falsi and no promise made without ..... vital details and further proceeds to hold that there was wilful misstatement and suppression of facts the observation as well as the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHerman and Maclean and Huddleston
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-24-1983
..... a registration statement may maintain an action under 10 b notwithstanding the express remedy for misstatements and omissions in registration statements provided by 11 of the securities act of 1933 1933 ..... purchased a security issued pursuant to a registration statement he need only show a material misstatement or omission to establish his prima facie case liability against the issuer of a security .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJayanti Rani Panda Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-16-1983
Reported in: 1984CriLJ1535
..... down may have some relevance this decision lays down that a misstatement of the intention of the defendant in doing a particular act may ..... be a misstatement of fact and if the plaintiff was misled by it an action ..... fact therefore in order to amount to a misstatement of fact the existing state of things and a misstatement as to that becomes relevant in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBlock Vs. Neal
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-07-1983
..... barred by that provision because respondent did not seek to recover on the basis of misstatements made by fmha officials united states v neustadt 366 u s 696 distinguished although ..... liability for pecuniary injuries which are wholly attributable to reliance on the government s negligent misstatements as a result the statutory exception undoubtedly preserves sovereign immunity with respect to a broad .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPyrites Phosphates and Chemicals Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-1983
Reported in: (1983)LC880DTri(Delhi)
..... normal 6 months if there had been any fraud collusion or wilful misstatement or suppression of facts on their part this provision cannot be ..... process of manufacture and further that there was no suppression or misstatement by them and as such provision of rule 9 2 would ..... nor that of rule 10 inasmuch as there was no fraud misstatement misconstruction on their part and further that rule 10a had been .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJadu Nath Paul Vs. Collector of Central Excise and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-15-1983
Reported in: 1983LC793D(Calcutta)
..... been erroneously refunded by reason of collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts by the importer or the exporter ..... did not mention whether there was any collusion or wilful misstatement or suppression of facts by the petitioner in terms of ..... was not levied by reason of any collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts by the petitioner therefore according to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaggio Vs. Williams
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-07-1983
..... my opinion the argument was prejudicial to the accused both because it appears to have misstated the law and because it may have led the jury to discount its grave responsibility ..... that argument unduly prejudiced williams because by overstating the role of appellate review it both misstated louisiana law and allowed the jury to discount its grave responsibilities when imposing the death .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Central Excise and Vs. Fertilisers and Chemicals
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Apr-08-1983
Reported in: (1983)LC969DTri(Chennai)
..... a non levy or short levy is by reason of fraud collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts or contravention of any of the provisions of this act or ..... the earlier part of the proviso we would read that section as referring to wilful misstatement of facts or suppression of facts when another factory of the respondent at cochin was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial