Skip to content


Misstatement - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: misstatement Year: 1983 Page 1 of about 26 results (0.007 seconds)
Mar 30 1983 (FN)

Tuten Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-30-1983

tuten v united states 460 u s 660 1983 u s supreme court tuten v united states 460 u s...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 30 1983 (TRI)

income-tax Officer Vs. Maddi Satyanarayana and Co. (P.)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on: Dec-30-1983

Reported in: (1984)8ITD249(Hyd.)

1 these appeals are by the revenue and they arise out of a common order of the commissioner appeals the...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 14 1983 (TRI)

Sriram Pistons and Rings Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-14-1983

Reported in: (1983)LC1227DTri(Delhi)

..... fact suppresio veri suggestio falsi it would be observed that wilful misstatement or suppression of facts occurring in the proviso to rule ..... in which the appellant did not believe in i e no misstatement no suppressio veri suggestio falsi and no promise made without ..... vital details and further proceeds to hold that there was wilful misstatement and suppression of facts the observation as well as the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 24 1983 (FN)

Herman and Maclean and Huddleston

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-24-1983

..... a registration statement may maintain an action under 10 b notwithstanding the express remedy for misstatements and omissions in registration statements provided by 11 of the securities act of 1933 1933 ..... purchased a security issued pursuant to a registration statement he need only show a material misstatement or omission to establish his prima facie case liability against the issuer of a security .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 16 1983 (HC)

Jayanti Rani Panda Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-16-1983

Reported in: 1984CriLJ1535

..... down may have some relevance this decision lays down that a misstatement of the intention of the defendant in doing a particular act may ..... be a misstatement of fact and if the plaintiff was misled by it an action ..... fact therefore in order to amount to a misstatement of fact the existing state of things and a misstatement as to that becomes relevant in the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 1983 (FN)

Block Vs. Neal

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-07-1983

..... barred by that provision because respondent did not seek to recover on the basis of misstatements made by fmha officials united states v neustadt 366 u s 696 distinguished although ..... liability for pecuniary injuries which are wholly attributable to reliance on the government s negligent misstatements as a result the statutory exception undoubtedly preserves sovereign immunity with respect to a broad .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 1983 (TRI)

Pyrites Phosphates and Chemicals Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-1983

Reported in: (1983)LC880DTri(Delhi)

..... normal 6 months if there had been any fraud collusion or wilful misstatement or suppression of facts on their part this provision cannot be ..... process of manufacture and further that there was no suppression or misstatement by them and as such provision of rule 9 2 would ..... nor that of rule 10 inasmuch as there was no fraud misstatement misconstruction on their part and further that rule 10a had been .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 15 1983 (HC)

Jadu Nath Paul Vs. Collector of Central Excise and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-15-1983

Reported in: 1983LC793D(Calcutta)

..... been erroneously refunded by reason of collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts by the importer or the exporter ..... did not mention whether there was any collusion or wilful misstatement or suppression of facts by the petitioner in terms of ..... was not levied by reason of any collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts by the petitioner therefore according to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 07 1983 (FN)

Maggio Vs. Williams

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-07-1983

..... my opinion the argument was prejudicial to the accused both because it appears to have misstated the law and because it may have led the jury to discount its grave responsibility ..... that argument unduly prejudiced williams because by overstating the role of appellate review it both misstated louisiana law and allowed the jury to discount its grave responsibilities when imposing the death .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 08 1983 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise and Vs. Fertilisers and Chemicals

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Apr-08-1983

Reported in: (1983)LC969DTri(Chennai)

..... a non levy or short levy is by reason of fraud collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts or contravention of any of the provisions of this act or ..... the earlier part of the proviso we would read that section as referring to wilful misstatement of facts or suppression of facts when another factory of the respondent at cochin was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //