Misstatement - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: misstatement Year: 1979 Page 1 of about 6 results (0.007 seconds)Touche Ross and Co. Vs. Redington
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-18-1979
..... 17 a against accountants who audit such reports based on misstatements contained in the reports footnote 2 page 442 u s ..... action on behalf of brokerage firm customers for losses arising from misstatements contained in 17 a reports but if congress intends those ..... purchasers or sellers of securities whose price was affected by the misstatement in light of this limitation the majority reasons we should .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTeamsters Vs. Daniel
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-16-1979
..... the value of a covered employee s interest in the pension plan and that such misstatements and omissions constituted a fraud in connection with the sale of a security in violation ..... employee s interest in the pension plan count i of the complaint charged that these misstatements and omissions constituted a fraud in connection with the sale of a security in violation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParklane Hosiery Co., Inc. Vs. Shore
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-09-1979
..... are still entitled to have a jury determine whether respondent was injured by the alleged misstatements and the amount of damages if any sustained by respondent ante at 439 u s .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMrs. Tarabai Lalji Vs. Collector and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-07-1979
Reported in: (1980)21GLR15
..... setting out the material particulars which the plaintiff claimed were not only inaccurate but intentionally misstated for purposes of confusing the real issue in dispute between the parties 6 on july .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBabbitt Vs. United Farm Workers Nat'l Union
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-05-1979
..... of truth or falsity as that is the qualification that appellees insist the prohibition of misstatements must include a construction to that effect would substantially affect the constitutional question presented it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEllora Industries Vs. Banarsi Das Goela and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-1979
Reported in: AIR1980Delhi254
..... principal question revolves round the twin notions 1 that the defendants misstatement must be one that would be taken as a reference to ..... suffer in consequence as to the first of these conditions the misstatement does not have to make out more than that the plaintiff ..... suffer in consequence as to the first of these conditions the misstatement does not have to make out more than that the plaintiff .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial