Skip to content


Misstatement - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: misstatement Year: 1990 Page 1 of about 38 results (0.116 seconds)
Apr 25 1990 (HC)

Committee of Management Sri. V.D. Misra Higher Secondary School Vs. Ad ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Apr-25-1990

Reported in: 1990CriLJ1906

orderpalok basu j 1 this petition under section 482 cr p c has been filed by committee of management of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 09 1990 (TRI)

Til Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-09-1990

Reported in: (1992)LC234Tri(Delhi)

1 m s spundish engineers ltd thane have filed an appeal being aggrieved from the order passed by the collector...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 27 1990 (HC)

Pdi Chemicals Private Ltd. and anr. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Gr. B ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-27-1990

Reported in: 1990(3)BomCR767

s m daud j 1 is polyvinyl alcohol pva liable to octroi within the intendment of article 42 to schedule...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 29 1990 (HC)

Raja Silk House (P) Ltd. Vs. P.S. Narayanaswamy

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-29-1990

Reported in: 1990(27)ECC94; ILR1990KAR872

..... is so done offence prosecution complaint against d c c i amp e of deliberate misstatement with intention of misleading court no prima fade case made out for offence petition not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 30 1990 (HC)

Applied Industrial Products Private Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Nov-30-1990

Reported in: 1991(32)ECC104; 1992(61)ELT364(Kar)

..... the facts of the petitioners case since no fraud suppression or misstatement is alleged in the show cause notice 10 the petitioners ..... notice viz absence of allegations of suppression fraud or collusion misstatement etc in the show cause notice the learned counsel has ..... invoke the extended period of limitation viz suppression fraud or wilful misstatement of facts 35 i am not convinced on facts that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 21 1990 (TRI)

Punjab Recorders Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-21-1990

Reported in: (1991)(37)LC642Tri(Delhi)

..... he argued that there being no wilful suppression of facts or misstatement on the part of the appellants the extended period of limitation ..... there was no finding in regard to any wilful suppression or misstatement of the facts by the appellants 5 we have gone ..... collector of central excise the appellants cannot be accused of wilful misstatement or suppression of facts with the intent to evade duty the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 06 1990 (TRI)

Bengal Chemicals and Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Feb-06-1990

Reported in: (1990)(27)ECC115

..... 19 elt 307 the tribunal held that the special period of limitation is inapplicable if misstatement suppression of facts is neither alleged in the show cause notice or proceedings nor spelt ..... metal products ltd 1988 38 elt 573 that there was no fraud collusion or wilful misstatement or suppression on the part of manufacturer when the classification list was finalised and the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 13 1990 (HC)

Jayant Vitamins Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-13-1990

Reported in: 1992(38)ECC199; 1991(53)ELT278(MP)

..... the part of the petitioners the supreme court has repeatedly held that unless the aforementioned misstatement or suppression of fact etc are not on the record provisions of section 11a of ..... excise authority it cannot be said that the appellant was guilty of any suppression or misstatement of facts fraud collusion or contravention of provisions of excise act in view of this .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 1990 (TRI)

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Aromatic Intermediates and

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-1990

Reported in: (1991)LC95Tri(Delhi)

..... of the product and there was no element of fraud suppression of facts or wilful misstatement on their part the show cause notices having been issued in april 1984 to all ..... vide paragraph 6 of the said order held that there was no fraud collusion wilful misstatement or suppression of facts on the part of the respondents and hence the longer time .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 05 1990 (FN)

Mckoy Vs. North Carolina

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-05-1990

..... at 494 u s 445 but they do violate the due process clause if they misstate the law to the defendant s detriment and it is not essential to that violation ..... that the law as misstated be an unconstitutional law thus to take the most extreme example if state law as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //