Misstatement - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: misstatement Year: 1990 Page 1 of about 38 results (0.116 seconds)Committee of Management Sri. V.D. Misra Higher Secondary School Vs. Ad ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-25-1990
Reported in: 1990CriLJ1906
orderpalok basu j 1 this petition under section 482 cr p c has been filed by committee of management of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTil Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-09-1990
Reported in: (1992)LC234Tri(Delhi)
1 m s spundish engineers ltd thane have filed an appeal being aggrieved from the order passed by the collector...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPdi Chemicals Private Ltd. and anr. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Gr. B ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-27-1990
Reported in: 1990(3)BomCR767
s m daud j 1 is polyvinyl alcohol pva liable to octroi within the intendment of article 42 to schedule...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaja Silk House (P) Ltd. Vs. P.S. Narayanaswamy
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-29-1990
Reported in: 1990(27)ECC94; ILR1990KAR872
..... is so done offence prosecution complaint against d c c i amp e of deliberate misstatement with intention of misleading court no prima fade case made out for offence petition not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTApplied Industrial Products Private Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-30-1990
Reported in: 1991(32)ECC104; 1992(61)ELT364(Kar)
..... the facts of the petitioners case since no fraud suppression or misstatement is alleged in the show cause notice 10 the petitioners ..... notice viz absence of allegations of suppression fraud or collusion misstatement etc in the show cause notice the learned counsel has ..... invoke the extended period of limitation viz suppression fraud or wilful misstatement of facts 35 i am not convinced on facts that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPunjab Recorders Ltd. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-21-1990
Reported in: (1991)(37)LC642Tri(Delhi)
..... he argued that there being no wilful suppression of facts or misstatement on the part of the appellants the extended period of limitation ..... there was no finding in regard to any wilful suppression or misstatement of the facts by the appellants 5 we have gone ..... collector of central excise the appellants cannot be accused of wilful misstatement or suppression of facts with the intent to evade duty the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBengal Chemicals and Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-1990
Reported in: (1990)(27)ECC115
..... 19 elt 307 the tribunal held that the special period of limitation is inapplicable if misstatement suppression of facts is neither alleged in the show cause notice or proceedings nor spelt ..... metal products ltd 1988 38 elt 573 that there was no fraud collusion or wilful misstatement or suppression on the part of manufacturer when the classification list was finalised and the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJayant Vitamins Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-1990
Reported in: 1992(38)ECC199; 1991(53)ELT278(MP)
..... the part of the petitioners the supreme court has repeatedly held that unless the aforementioned misstatement or suppression of fact etc are not on the record provisions of section 11a of ..... excise authority it cannot be said that the appellant was guilty of any suppression or misstatement of facts fraud collusion or contravention of provisions of excise act in view of this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of C. Ex. Vs. Aromatic Intermediates and
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-1990
Reported in: (1991)LC95Tri(Delhi)
..... of the product and there was no element of fraud suppression of facts or wilful misstatement on their part the show cause notices having been issued in april 1984 to all ..... vide paragraph 6 of the said order held that there was no fraud collusion wilful misstatement or suppression of facts on the part of the respondents and hence the longer time .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMckoy Vs. North Carolina
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-05-1990
..... at 494 u s 445 but they do violate the due process clause if they misstate the law to the defendant s detriment and it is not essential to that violation ..... that the law as misstated be an unconstitutional law thus to take the most extreme example if state law as .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial