Misstatement - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: misstatement Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 25 results (0.008 seconds)Toshiba Anand Batteries Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-1986
Reported in: (1986)(10)ECC256
1 the dispute is whether a single dry cell manufactured by m s toshiba anand betteries is a dry battery...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBengal Electric Lamps Works Ltd. and anr. Vs. Collector of Central Exc ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-03-1986
Reported in: 1986(9)ECC216; 1986(25)ELT38(Kar)
..... under the rules to show that there was no misrepresentation or misstatement of facts 8 sri sundaraswamy has relied upon the decision ..... contended that it is a case of wilful suppression or misstatement which was implicit and covered by rule 10a before the ..... and rule 10a deals with culpable actions such as misconduct deliberate misstatement suppression etc rule 10 applies only to honest mistakes and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRattan Chand and Sons Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-1986
Reported in: (1987)(11)ECC68
..... collusion or misconstruction on the part of an officer or through misstatement as to quantity description or value of such goods on the ..... attracted 12 the contention of shri sachar is that the word misstatement as to description would not cover cases of suppression of fact ..... that charge it appears to us would be a charge of misstatement as to the description of the goods and would therefore if .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of C. Ex. Vs. Indian Card Board Industries Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-1986
Reported in: (1989)(43)ELT75TriDel
..... be no automatic inference that the appellants had made wilful misstatement or suppression of facts with the intent to evade ..... proviso 11a there was neither allegation of fraud collusion wilful misstatement or suppression of facts nor any allegation of intent to ..... these circumstances to impute allegation of deliberate suppression or wilful misstatement with intent to evade duty which it is necessary to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDarden Vs. Wainwright
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-23-1986
..... petitioner of a fair trial the comments did not manipulate or misstate the evidence or implicate other specific rights of the accused and ..... prosecutors argument page 477 u s 182 did not manipulate or misstate the evidence nor did it implicate other specific rights of ..... first the court says that the summations did not manipulate or misstate the evidence or implicate other specific rights of the accused .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMoran Vs. Burbine
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-10-1986
..... the court appears to draw ante at 475 u s 423 424 between a deceptive misstatement and the concealment by the police of the critical fact that an attorney retained by ..... no reason why the police should not be permitted to make the same kind of misstatements to the suspect that they are apparently allowed to make to his lawyer miranda however .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRandall Vs. Loftsgaarden
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-02-1986
..... revised offering memorandum and that petitioners had reasonably relied on these material misstatements which caused their damages among other misstatements respondents had mischaracterized the financing available the terms of the land lease .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of C. Ex., New Delhi Vs. Fedders Lloyd Corporation Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-1986
Reported in: (1986)(8)ECC57
..... levied or short paid or erroneously refunded by reason of fraud collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts or contravention of any of the provisions of this act or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLyng Vs. Castillo
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-27-1986
..... relatives are undoubtedly as honest as other food stamp recipients the potential for mistaken or misstated claims of separate dining would be greater in the case of close relatives than would .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLife Insurance Corporation Vs. Vasappa
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-19-1986
Reported in: AIR1987Kant216; ILR1987KAR1
..... does not establish it by independent evidence the fraudulent intention and the deliberate suppression of misstatement material sic to the acceptance of the proposal then the insurer cannot succeed on the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial