Skip to content


Misstatement - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: misstatement Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 93 results (0.009 seconds)
May 05 2004 (SC)

Associated Cement Co. Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-05-2004

Reported in: 2004(94)ECC185; 2004(168)ELT151(SC); 2004(5)SCALE718; (2004)9SCC727; [2006]144STC95(SC)

g p mathur j 1 leave granted in slp c no 1186 of 2000 municipal corporation katni v m s...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 17 2004 (HC)

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt. Sanju Devi and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Sep-17-2004

Reported in: II(2005)ACC531; 2004(3)BLJR1903; [2004(4)JCR312(Jhr)]

m y eqbal j 1 these two appeals at the instance of the appellant oriental insurance company are directed against...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 28 2004 (HC)

Ashok Pratap Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: May-28-2004

Reported in: (2004)2UPLBEC1909

b s chauhan j 1 this writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 5 4 2004 annexure...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 16 2004 (TRI)

K. Narendra Babu Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Dec-16-2004

Reported in: (2005)(98)ECC782

1 this appeal is against the following order of the commissioner of customs 1 i order confiscation of 96 numbers...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 09 2004 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Charminar Non-wovens Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Nov-09-2004

Reported in: (2005)(180)ELT348Tri(Bang.)

1 the issue for determination in this appeal of the revenue against the order of the commissioner of central excise...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 16 2004 (HC)

Jay Chemical Industries Proprietory Concern Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Jun-16-2004

Reported in: (2005)1GLR86

..... only of 1 percent of total claim petitioner cannot be held to have made deliberate misstatement withholding of entire claim not maintainable respondent directed to consider petitioner s claim hence the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 03 2004 (SC)

Deelip Singh @ Dilip Kumar Vs. State of Bihar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-03-2004

Reported in: AIR2005SC203; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)65; 2004(3)BLJR2373; 2005(2)MhLj147; 2005(I)OLR(SC)181; RLW2005(2)SC165; 2004(9)SCALE278; (2005)1SCC88; 2005(1)LC179(SC)

..... the vintage decision of the chancery court which laid down that a misstatement of the intention of the defendant in doing a particular act would ..... d 459 and observed thus this decision lays down that a misstatement of the intention of the defendant in doing a particular act ..... tantamount to a misstatement of fact and an action of deceit can be founded on it .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2004 (HC)

Floating Services Ltd. Vs. MV 'San Fransceco Dipalola'

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Mar-09-2004

Reported in: [2004]52SCL762(Guj)

..... the supreme court revoked the order granting special leave and held that there was a misstatement of material fact and that amounted to serious misrepresentation the principles applicable are same whether ..... it is a case of misstatement of a material fact or suppression of material fact p 201 35 the supreme court .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 23 2004 (TRI)

Aeon'S Construction Products Vs. Commissioner Of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Sep-23-2004

Reported in: (2005)(99)ECC125

..... was held by the apex court that if fraud collusion misstatement of fact etc were alleged in the show cause notice ..... misdeclaration wrong declaration of a tariff entry cannot be equated with misstatement of a fact with fraudulent intent the former viz misdeclaration ..... revenue would safeguard the revenue s interests on the other hand misstatement of material facts with intent to evade payment of duty .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 30 2004 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Brilliant Industries Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Jul-30-2004

Reported in: (2005)(184)ELT205Tri(Bang.)

..... to 24 7 1997 cannot be attributed to reasons such as suppression of facts wilful misstatement fraud or contravention of rules with intent to evade payment of duty i am therefore ..... matter and has accepted the plea that there was no suppression of facts or wilful misstatement or fraud or contravention of rules with an intention to evade payment of duty there .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //