Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: gujarat Year: 1977 Page 1 of about 113 results (0.933 seconds)Rameshchandra Bhikhabhai Patel Vs. Maneklal Maganlal Patel and anr.
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jul-26-1977
Reported in : AIR1978Guj62; (1978)GLR329
the learned trial judge rightly discountenanced all this story we therefore do hold that till year 1946 or thereabout when southern
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhikhalal Bhovan Vs. Sunni Vora Noormamad Abdul Karim and ors.
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Dec-07-1977
Reported in : AIR1978Guj149; (1978)GLR248
when he happens to pay the same to the local authority if such an implied assertion of the landlord arising out plaintiffs as a part of their pleadings liable to be amended or elaborated the other side cannot be allowed to be the words of the learned single judge who decided the civil revn appln no 712 of 1972 on 3 2 1976 equivalent or synonym of the term near the term next therefore means nearest closest most contiguous when a month is to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-i Vs. Industrial Machinery Manufac ...
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Oct-03-1977
Reported in : [1985]151ITR533(Guj)
1960 61 and 1961 62 under s 15c of the indian i t act 1922 and in respect of the assessment be challenged when the appeal was filed it has wide powers to allow the party to add to or alter the due by the assessee were required to be deducted and therefore the aspect whether such deduction in steel cast corporation s
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA'bad Cotton Mfg. Co. Ltd. etc. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Apr-13-1977
Reported in : (1977)1GLR714
the speech of the union law minister while moving the constitution forty fourth amendment bill 1976 for consideration in the rajya itself bhagwati j as he then was in union of india v narendra 1968 9glr261 took the same view that those b and c but a further fetter is added under article 226 3 that no such petition for redress of injury collector because only the collector in gujarat had such a power 32 in orient paper mills v union of india 1973ecr1 put that interpretation which would advance the object of the parliament and would not frustrate the same we would however have has resulted in substantial failure of justice original article 226 amended art 226 2 the power conferred by clause 1 to the act and the rules under the relevant self assessment procedure this trade notice is challenged as totally null and void additional excise duty is sought to be recovered from them therefore on both the grounds urged by mr sorabji the petitioners
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR.M. Gajjar Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : May-04-1977
Reported in : AIR1978Guj102; (1977)GLR738
235 clearly includes in this wide control after the present constitution even persons in the judicial service as defined in art the high court shall have superintendence over an courts in india for the time being subject to its appellate jurisdiction and be included on no statutory principle of construction therefore this article should be rewritten by recasting the opening part as if read down consistently with this art 235 by vesting this power only in the high court therefore the authority to whom the said article is truncated in the present 42nd constitutional amendment package because of the words generality in art 227 2 of the government servant and in such appeals in the procedure which is prescribed in the subsequent rules r 21 provides civil judicial posts inferior to the post of district judge therefore the wide inclusion of judicial officers had initially a limited
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShardaben Jayantilal Shah and ors. Vs. R.S. Belsare, Tax Recovery Offi ...
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jun-30-1977
Reported in : (1978)0GLR636; [1978]112ITR156(Guj)
schedule to income tax act 1961 and article 226 of constitution of india petition filed challenging order of attachment passed in income tax act 1961 and article 226 of constitution of india petition filed challenging order of attachment passed in respect of in the relevant rules in schedule ii the fetter in article 226 3 could not be invoked in the present case the property in question thereafter the tax recovery officer has power under rule 11 4 and 5 to deal with these 113 where the scope of the relevant fetter on the amended article 226 3 had been examined in that decision article defaulter s movable property 3 rule 11 provides for the procedure of investigation by the tax recovery officer as under 1 up in supersession of the ordinary civil courts of law therefore this is not a case where any disputed questions of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBai Ramilaben, D/O Ambalal Jinabhai Vs. K. Antilal Shankerlal
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Aug-29-1977
Reported in : (1978)19GLR29
had left his house without any fault on his p article he also stated that his monthly income was rs 263 to get a order for maintenance in her favour this amended provision contained in section 125 of the new code is consent 13 2 section 126 the code provides for the procedure to be followed for obtaining an order for maintenance 13
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Gujarat Vs. Kantilal Pratapji and ors.
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Nov-18-1977
Reported in : (1978)19GLR417
section 6 iv j and not ad valorem as per article 7 of the first schedule of the act now the on the basis of an alleged infirmity in following the procedure for making demand on one hand and a challenge to of a conveyance in future the learned trial judge was therefore in error in taking the view that the decision in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahagujarat Hawkers Vepari Mahajan Vs. the Municipal Corporation
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Aug-03-1977
Reported in : (1978)19GLR274
represent a fluctuating and unascertainable body of persons is given power to file a suit against the allegedly habitual illegal acts and permission under order 1 rule 8 of the civil procedure code was sought the said permission was given by the could not dispute this particular statement of mr shah and therefore i take it as true now it so happened that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDirector of Stores Vs. P.S. Dube
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jul-28-1977
Reported in : (1978)19GLR253
now assailed in this petition under article 226 of the constitution 3 the case of the respondent as may be seen work is contrary to tie settlement arrived at between the union and the corporation on may 10 1974 it is also this order that is now assailed in this petition under article 226 of the constitution 3 the case of the respondent employee included in appendix a and declared by the competent authority as eligible for overtime payment is called for work beyond judgment of a single judge of this court in special civil application no 672 of 1963 decided on february 6 1968 was sent out of station on tour on duty and therefore his absence from the headquarters so long as he was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT