Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: kolkata Year: 1977 Page 1 of about 179 results (1.136 seconds)Md. Akbar Ali Sardar Vs. Firoze Khatoon Bibi and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Sep-02-1977
Reported in : 1977CriLJ1654
the criminal procedure code read with article 227 of the constitution and is directed against ex parte order dated 25 2 6 expressly excluding the provision of section 18 of the indian limitation act referred to before it will be attracted in 401 and 482 of the criminal procedure code read with article 227 of the constitution and is directed against ex parte an application under sections 401 and 482 of the criminal procedure code read with article 227 of the constitution and is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSurajmull Choteylal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jan-21-1977
Reported in : [1978]114ITR130(Cal)
transactions under explanation 2 to section 24 1 of the indian income tax act 1922 b if the question no 1 crept in the judgment and the court held it had power to rectify such errors the position in the instant case prohibited by any other provisions of the code of civil procedure 4 order 20 rule 3 of the code provides that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDhane Ali Mia and ors. Vs. Sobhan Ali and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Oct-11-1977
Reported in : AIR1978Cal399,(1978)1CompLJ35(Cal),82CWN431
is no bar under sections 244 and 245 of the indian succession act that the minor executors duly represented by a the mohammaden law but such contention is foreign to the scope of probate proceeding or a proceeding for grant of letters under the provisions of order 32 rule 5 of the civil p c the minor can make an application when duly
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSati Kanta Guha and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jul-25-1977
Reported in : 1977CriLJ1644
code for quashing the proceedings against them under its inherent power the high court on consideration of the materials found no precious safeguard so to express a prebattle protection conferred by parliament in its wisdom upon accused persons charge sheeted by the considered the scope of sections 227 and 482 of the code in particular 8 on the question of the inherent powers gave any false information regarding any offence in our view therefore a charge under section 302 i p c has been
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.K. Seth Vs. Narendra Nath Banerjee
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : May-31-1977
Reported in : AIR1977Cal388
he refers to a decision reported in punjab and sindh bank ltd v jagdish lal the principle laid down in this are clear and unambiguous and as such there is no scope for alternative interpretations mr lahiri very much relies on a was issued on an application under section 115 of the code ad interim injunction was prayed for but the same was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax and anr. Vs. Punam Chand Banthia
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jul-06-1977
Reported in : [1978]112ITR727(Cal)
on the reverse of the notice viz books of accounts bank pass book and other related papers this notice was served facts leading to the making of the said application under article 226 by the respondent are set out hereunder 2 the impugned notice under section 148 was issued in exercise of powers under section 147 1 b of the act the said
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.D. Ghosh Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jul-15-1977
Reported in : [1978]111ITR502(Cal)
money borrowed by mortgage of the said land from the bank the appellate assistant commissioner therefore held that the income of the land and money received by way of advance rent therefore arises directly and in any event indirectly from the transfer
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahasukhrai Ramrichpal and ors. Vs. Tax Recovery Officer and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Aug-24-1977
Reported in : [1980]124ITR332(Cal)
157 28 there has since then been changes in the constitution of the firm from time to time smt panna debi agarwal who retired from the partnership firm in 1975 certain bank accounts of the petitioner firm were also attached on june the petitioner contended that the tro had no authority or jurisdiction to realise the arrears of income tax payable by the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDaga Films Vs. Lotus Production and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jul-04-1977
Reported in : AIR1977Cal312
trial 1 is the plaintiff firm duly registered under the indian partnership act 1932 as alleged in para 1 of the counter claim shall not exceed the pecuniary limits of the jurisdiction of the court clause 2 such counter claim shall have any vested interest in procedural law as such the new amendment would be attracted in this case on this point there with the plea of set off 19 under the civil procedure code a counter claim by itself was incompetent and was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaich Ali Khan Vs. Hazi Sadek Ali Sk. and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jun-08-1977
Reported in : AIR1977Cal295,81CWN926
to whether he was a bargadar to the officer or authority mentioned in sub section 1 of section 18 of the division bench a substantive right has been affected and the amended provision cannot impeach a pending proceeding 10 it seems to made by sub section 3 of section 21 relate to procedure and as such it would affect pending proceeding the division proceedings before any civil or criminal court 15 we hold therefore that the provisions of sub section 3 of section 21
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT