Application - Judgment Search Results

Ramnarayan Mills Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in : (1991)LC239Tri(Chennai)

..... authorities to work out the count of the yarn after allowing for tolerance limit as applicable in such cases as a matter of practice either by the departmental authorities or is .....

indopco, Inc. Vs. Commissioner

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 293 294 ca4 1982 bank expenditures for expansion related planning reports feasibility studies and regulatory applications did not create or enhance separate and identifiable assets and therefore were ordinary and necessary .....

Mu'MIn Vs. Virginia

Court : US Supreme Court

..... united states 283 u s at 283 u s 314 315 this reasoning is fully applicable here in any case the majority s solicitude for administrative convenience is wholly gratuitous numerous .....

Farrey Vs. Sanderfoot

Court : US Supreme Court

..... to avoid the fixing of the lien on that interest iii we turn to the application of 522 f 1 to this case whether sanderfoot ever possessed an interest to which .....

MartIn Vs. OSH Rev. Comm'n

Court : US Supreme Court

..... rules and for seeing that they are workable and effective in their day to day application and would allow congress to hold a single administrative actor politically accountable for the overall .....

Wilson Vs. Seiter

Court : US Supreme Court

..... eighth amendment scrutiny the eighth amendment s ban on inflicting cruel and unusual punishments made applicable to the states by the fourteenth amendment proscribe s more than physically barbarous punishments estelle .....

Ylst Vs. Nunnemaker

Court : US Supreme Court

..... presumption assists as we have said not only administrability but accuracy as well unlike the application of harris to unexplained orders which achieves the former at the expense of the latter .....

Collins Vs. Harker Heights

Court : US Supreme Court

..... a similar manner as the claim by this petitioner on the other hand a logical application of the holding might also bar potentially meritorious claims by employees if for example the .....

Department of State Vs. Ray

Court : US Supreme Court

..... requisite invasion of privacy to support an exemption 6 claim is heavier than the standard applicable to exemption 7 c see department of justice v reporters comm for freedom of press .....

Mcneil Vs. Wisconsin

Court : US Supreme Court

..... likelihood that a suspect would wish counsel to be present is not the test for applicability of edwards the rule of that case applies only when the suspect ha s expressed .....