Skip to content


Application - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: application Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 375 results (0.126 seconds)
Oct 30 2003 (HC)

Vanavil Dyes and Chemicals Ltd., Rep. by the Manager Commercial Operat ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-30-2003

Reported in: 2003LC299(Madras)

..... forth his objection on the question of maintainability of the application under section 35ee 4 cannot be countenanced that the ..... fresh consideration on the question of maintainability of the revision application and also on merits the first respondent shall return ..... therefore the first respondent lacked jurisdiction even to entertain the application for condonation of delay it was then contended that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 30 2003 (HC)

Vanavil Dyes and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Joint Secretary (Revision Applicat ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-30-2003

Reported in: 2003(158)ELT432(Mad)

..... forth his objection on the question of maintainability of the application under section 35ff 4 cannot be countenanced that the ..... fresh consideration on the question of maintainability of the revision application and also on merits the first respondent shall return ..... therefore the first respondent lacked jurisdiction even to entertain the application for condonation of delay it was then contended that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 08 2003 (TRI)

Bpl Ltd. and Bstl Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: May-08-2003

Reported in: (2003)(90)ECC167

..... duty demandable under section 11ac of the act iv to levy interest at the rate applicable in terms of section 11ab of the act v to impose penalty on the appellant .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 2003 (TRI)

Quilon Metal Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: May-14-2003

Reported in: (2003)(89)ECC97

..... treated differently therefore the clarification given in the context of the agarbaties could not be applicable to dhoop sticks etc and the tribunal came to the conclusion that inasmuch as the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 13 2003 (TRI)

Ahmedabad Advance Mills Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-13-2003

..... provision of clause for extended period under section 11a i of the central excise act applicable in this case c he also found that since wholesale price of the yarn for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 13 2003 (TRI)

Eupharma Labortories Ltd., R.V. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-13-2003

Reported in: (2003)(160)ELT979Tri(Mum.)bai

..... barred and even though the provisions of section 11ac and rule 57i 5 were not applicable in this case penalty under rule 173q was called for therefore he upheld penalty imposed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 13 2003 (TRI)

Jass Kann International Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-13-2003

Reported in: (2003)(162)ELT445TriDel

..... appeals require to be finally disposed of at this stage accordingly we allow the present applications and proceed to deal with the appeals 2 in the order impugned in these appeals .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 12 2003 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Diamond Plywood Industries

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-12-2003

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT854TriDel

..... the confiscation of the goods on the ground that only provisions of rule 226 were applicable he has also reduced the penalty as indicated above 3 i have heard both sides .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 09 2003 (TRI)

Indian Aluminium Company Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: May-09-2003

Reported in: (2003)(161)ELT184Tri(Bang.)

..... the appellants and similar other manufacturers purchase the same to recover vanadium pentoxide which finds application in the manufacture of ferro alloys as an alloying agent this sludge in the market .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 09 2003 (TRI)

Hewlett Packard India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: May-09-2003

Reported in: (2003)LC232Tri(Bang.)alore

..... paragraphs of the apex court s judgments in mrf approved in para 6 is squarely applicable in this case a specious reinterpretation of the judgment is being made by the appellant .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //