Skip to content


Application - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: application Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 342 results (0.174 seconds)
Jan 01 2000 (TRI)

Tata Ssl Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-01-2000

Reported in: (2002)(146)ELT603Tri(Mum.)bai

1 after hearing both sides on the early hearing application we have decided to take up the appeal itself for disposal 2 the order of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 17 2000 (TRI)

Kamla Castings Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-17-2000

Reported in: (2000)(71)ECC130

..... 1993 under notification no 54 93 it was noticed that the said notification was not applicable to the product in question proceedings were drawn and the duty was confirmed as above .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 25 2000 (TRI)

Universal Containers Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-25-2000

Reported in: (2000)(72)ECC123

..... 3 the learned counsel for the appellant submits that clause ii under column 4 is applicable to their case and not clause i as held in the impugned order he explained .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 25 2000 (TRI)

Shri Jawan Mai Soni Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-25-2000

Reported in: (2000)(72)ECC142

..... therefore i pass the following order 7 the impugned order therefore is non speaking without application of mind and in violation of the principles of natural justice the findings of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 24 2000 (TRI)

Parag Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-24-2000

Reported in: (2000)(121)ELT540Tri(Mum.)bai

..... in sub rule 1 in effect this is the price that is held to be applicable by the supreme court in ujagar prints the cost of manufacture would ordinarily not change .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 19 2000 (TRI)

Asiatic Engg. P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-19-2000

Reported in: (2001)(130)ELT161TriDel

..... they had described the product differently the decision relied upon by them are also not applicable to the facts of the present matters for example in the case of bharat surgical .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 18 2000 (TRI)

Overseas International Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jul-18-2000

Reported in: (2001)(127)ELT599Tri(Chennai)

..... same as in the other documents applied in the circumstances case laws quoted are not applicable to this case 4 learned consultant shri ms kumaraswamy for the appellants submits that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 18 2000 (TRI)

O.K. Play India Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-18-2000

Reported in: (2000)(70)ECC752

..... payment of duty and the dcm decision of the supreme court of india was not applicable to moulding powder due to chapter note 6 b of chapter 39 he confirmed the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 17 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Terry Tex

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jul-17-2000

Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT201Tri(Chennai)

..... respect of terry towelling fabrics he therefore submits that the ratio thereof would be clearly applicable to the facts of this case and the revenue appeal is required to be rejected .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 27 2000 (TRI)

Cyanides and Chemicals Co. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-27-2000

Reported in: (2000)(121)ELT699Tri(Mum.)bai

..... not dispute that on merits credit could not have been taken he however questions the applicability of the extended period for two reasons the first is that the department was fully .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //