Skip to content


Application - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: application Year: 1997 Page 1 of about 347 results (0.3 seconds)
Jan 01 1997 (TRI)

Rupali Prints Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-01-1997

Reported in: (1997)(90)ELT481TriDel

..... boiler by the appellants without obtaining licence from the inspector of boilers as regards the applicability of notification no 79 82 the ld dr submitted that notification no 79 82 in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 12 1997 (TRI)

Collector of Customs Vs. Elcaps Capacitors Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-12-1997

Reported in: (1997)(96)ELT88TriDel

..... were not eligible for the benefit of notification no 315 83 cus and that the applicable exemption notification no was 132 85 cus dated 19 4 1985 the asstt collector of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 14 1997 (TRI)

Mahavir Spinning Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-14-1997

Reported in: (1998)(98)ELT708TriDel

..... the revenue before us there is therefore no need for us to go into the applicability of cited judgments in the present case we have also seen the tribunal s judgment .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 14 1997 (TRI)

Gunwant Lal Godawat Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-14-1997

Reported in: (1998)(99)ELT332TriDel

..... their case silver was not notified goods during the material period and therefore the rigours applicable in respect of notified goods cannot be followed in respect of the goods which are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 12 1997 (TRI)

Kerala Co-op. Milk Marketing Vs. C.C.E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Aug-12-1997

Reported in: (1999)(112)ELT191Tri(Chennai)

..... concerned the lower authority will demand the duty after taking into consideration this notification if applicable to the appellants

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 13 1997 (TRI)

Pentax Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-13-1997

Reported in: (1998)(99)ELT368TriDel

..... 9027 90 the notification no 172 89 cus dated 29 5 1989 was also not applicable 6 the departmental representative had referred to the explanatory notes under the harmonized note description .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 11 1997 (TRI)

Wonder Wear Private Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Aug-11-1997

Reported in: (1998)(74)LC71Tri(Bang.)alore

1 the prayer in the application is for dispensation of pre deposit of duty amount of rs 38 29 012 35 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 11 1997 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Brindavan Beverages (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Aug-11-1997

Reported in: (1999)(106)ELT403Tri(Chennai)

..... lower authority and in the grounds of appeal the following has been urged therefore this application is accordingly made on the following grounds in his statement dated 8 2 1994 shri .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 12 1997 (TRI)

Samrat International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-12-1997

Reported in: (1997)LC566Tri(Delhi)

..... 1977 as it existed at the relevant time provided that for the purpose of considering applications for import replenishment under the import policy for registered exporters the relevant date of export .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 14 1997 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Basant Tubes Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-14-1997

Reported in: (1997)(95)ELT311TriDel

..... rule 56a 2a pertains to utilising the credit on the assessee seeking permission on an application and pending the grant of such permission the rule itself says that if the permission .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //