Application - Judgment Search Results
…applicants. Vs. Bhagwati Developers Private Limited
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-19-2014
Mr.Ravi Kapoor, Mr.R.K.Jhunjhunwala, Ms.Alpona Chowdhury, Mr.S.Rudra. Judgment on: June 19, 2014. Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, J.: These are two applications for review of the judgment and order dated June 10, 2013 passed by a Division Bench of this
Applicable to the Facts of the Present Case. Respondent No.1 Vs. Kirpa ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-01-2013
20.12.2011 passed by a Single Bench of this Court, dismissing CWP No.23536 of 2011. The petitioner filed an application for correction of khaSr.girdawari qua land measuring 24 kanals and 12 marlas, stating that he be shown in
Navjeet Kaur ....Applicant- Appellant Vs. Navjeet Kaur ....Applicant- ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-04-2014
relatives, therefore, the appellant does not wish the puruse the appeal. She wants to withdraw the same. The application is supported by an affidavit of the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has no
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Virender ....Applicant- Appellant Vs. Virender ....Applicant- Appellan ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
....Non-applicant - Respondent Coram:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE S.S.SARON HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE NAVITA SINGH Present: Mr.Bharat Bhushan Azad, Advocate for the applicant- appellant. ***** S.S.Saron, J. The marriage between the parties was solemnised as per Hindu rites and ceremonies at
Smt. Joginder Kaur ......... Applicant/Petitioner Vs. Smt. Joginder Ka ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-25-2014
or not?. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Rekha Mittal, J. Prayer in this application is for modification/recalling of order dated 31.01.2014, passed by the Court to the extent of deposit of Rs.5,00,000/-
R (on the Application of Quila and Another) (Fc) (Respondents) Vs. Sec ...
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
rules currently in force by which the appellant, the Secretary of State for the Home Department, determines an application for a visa to enter or remain in the United Kingdommade by the spouse of a person who
R (on the Application of Cart) (Appellant) Vs. the Upper Tribunal (Res ...
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-22-2011
to the Immigration and Asylum Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal was dismissed less than two weeks later. His application to the First-tier Tribunal for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal was refused in May and his
R (on the application of Davies and another) (Appellants) Vs. the Comm ...
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-19-2011
circumstances in which an individual becomes non-resident and not ordinarily resident in the UK. The issues arise within applications for judicial review. Mr Davies and Mr James ("the first appellants") issued their application in February 2007. They
Haryana Space Application Centre (harsac) Vs. M/s Pan India Consultant ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-20-2021
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.131 OF2021(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (Civil) No.13503 of 2020) HARYANA SPACE APPLICATION CENTRE (HARSAC) & ANR. … APELLANTS Versus M/S PAN INDIA CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. … RESPONDENT ORDER INDU MALHOTRA,
Application for Directions and Office Report
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-21-1993
Reported in: (1994)1SCC680
M.N. Venkatachaliah, C.J.,; A.M. Ahmadi,; J.S. Verma,; G.N. Ray and; S.P. Bhar, JJ.1. By these applications the applicants seek certain directions from the Court to the Government of India and the authorised persons to
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free