Application - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: application Year: 1999 Page 1 of about 323 results (0.603 seconds)Review Applicant: Mrs. Farida Shaukath Vs. Unit Trust of India, Madras ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-26-1999
Reported in : 1999(2)CTC736
..... decision of the 1st respondent though it defeats the substantive legitimate expectation of the review applicant is well justified on wednesbury principle of reasonableness and the same cannot be said ..... decision of the 1st respondent though it defeats the substantive legitimate expectation of the review applicant is well justified on wednesbury principle of reasonableness and the same cannot be said .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Central Excise Vs. Noel Pharmaceuticals
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on : Jun-24-1999
Reported in : (1999)(113)ELT66Tri(Mum.)bai
..... collector allowing the credit deal with the end use certificate and so it is not applicable to this case 3 perused the trade notice no 12 91 dated 8 2 1991 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKone Elevator India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on : Jul-02-1999
Reported in : (1999)(66)ECC362
1 this is a stay application praying for waiver and stay from pre depositing an amount of rs 3 37 503 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBpl Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on : Jul-02-1999
Reported in : (1999)(66)ECC379
1 this stay application alongwith appeal was heard together by granting waiver of pre deposit in the matter as .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of C. Ex. Vs. Ashok Plastic Industries
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on : Jul-02-1999
Reported in : (1999)(113)ELT319TriDel
..... the rate of duty on the product was changed by amending notification and the rate applicable was rs 100 per kg the demand has correctly been raised and therefore should have .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Central Excise Vs. Kiran Electricals
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on : Jun-30-1999
Reported in : (1999)(112)ELT1046TriDel
..... heading 8544 00 of the central excise tariff as wire and cables and filed an application with the collector of central excise appeals the collector of central excise observed as under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBritish Health Products India Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on : Jun-25-1999
Reported in : (1999)(65)ECC806
..... direct or indirect in the business of the assessee it is essential to attract the applicability of the first part of the definition that the assessee and the person alleged to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Dynomac Pumps
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on : Jun-25-1999
Reported in : (1999)(113)ELT513TriDel
..... in appeal dated 24 5 1996 issue involved is whether principle of unjust enrichment is applicable where the products in respect of which refund of duty is claimed has been captively .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Indian Oil Corpn. Vs. Cce, Patna
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on : Jun-24-1999
1 the miscellaneous application is for restoration of the appeal dismissed earlier for non productioni of clearance certificate from the high powered committee now the high powered committee has allowed the appellant to pursue the appeal before the tribunal accordingly we restore the stay petition and appeal to its original number
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGrauer and Weil (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on : Jul-06-1999
Reported in : (2000)LC52Tri(Delhi)
..... the case of d bhoormull and kanungo amp co are not at all appropriate or applicable to the present case as they were made with reference to smuggling of goods in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT